billHCONRES89Event Thursday, April 23, 2026Analyzed

Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

Neutral
Impact4/10

Summary

H. Con. Res. 89, an early-stage bill, directs the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, unless explicitly authorized. This resolution, if passed, would impact the operational scope for defense contractors involved in military activities in the region. The bill is currently in the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

See which stocks are affected

Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.

Already have an account? Log in

Key Takeaways

  • 1.H. Con. Res. 89 directs the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, unless explicitly authorized by Congress.
  • 2.The bill is in the early stages of the legislative process, having been referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
  • 3.No direct funding is authorized or appropriated by this resolution; its impact is on military policy and potential operational scope for defense contractors.
  • 4.Related bills indicate a broader legislative focus on U.S. military engagement with Iran.

Market Implications

This concurrent resolution, if enacted, would primarily affect the operational environment for defense contractors involved in U.S. military activities in the Middle East. While it does not directly impact revenue or create new contracts, a shift in military posture could influence future defense spending priorities and the types of services and equipment required. Companies such as Lockheed Martin ($LMT), Boeing ($BA), General Dynamics ($GD), RTX Corporation ($RTX), and Northrop Grumman ($NOC) could experience indirect effects on their long-term planning and contract bidding strategies. The recent Presidential Determination concerning Air Force jet fighter training operations offers a localized positive for defense contractors by reducing regulatory burdens, which could partially offset any perceived uncertainty from the proposed resolution regarding Iran.

Full Analysis

H. Con. Res. 89, introduced on April 23, 2026, by Rep. Jayapal (D-WA), is a concurrent resolution directing the President to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities against Iran. The bill explicitly states that this removal is pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution and would occur unless a declaration of war or specific authorization for the use of military force against Iran is enacted. The resolution includes provisions to allow for self-defense, maintaining a defensive troop presence, and intelligence sharing. This bill does not authorize or appropriate any funding. Its primary mechanism is to set policy regarding military engagement, which could indirectly affect the operational tempo and contract requirements for defense companies. The bill is in its earliest stages, having been referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs on the same day it was introduced. Its passage would require approval from both the House and the Senate, and concurrent resolutions do not require the President's signature to take effect, but they also do not have the force of law. Structural winners and losers are not directly created by this bill, as it does not involve procurement or specific programs. However, a reduction in U.S. military engagement in hostilities could potentially alter the demand for certain defense services and equipment. Companies like Lockheed Martin ($LMT), Boeing ($BA), General Dynamics ($GD), RTX Corporation ($RTX), and Northrop Grumman ($NOC), which are major defense contractors, could see shifts in their operational focus or contract pipelines if the U.S. military posture in the region changes significantly. The recent Presidential Determination on Air Force jet fighter training operations in Idaho, Oregon, and Nevada, issued on April 20, 2026, reduces regulatory burdens for defense contractors in those specific regions, potentially improving efficiency and profitability for a one-year period for companies like those listed. This executive action provides a counter-balancing positive for defense contractors, unrelated to the Iran resolution. As an early-stage bill, H. Con. Res. 89 faces a long legislative path. It must first be considered and potentially marked up by the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, then pass a vote in the full House, and subsequently pass the Senate. The existence of related bills (HCONRES87, HCONRES88) indicates a broader legislative interest in this issue, suggesting a coalition is forming around the topic of military engagement with Iran.

Market Impact Score

4/10
Minimal ImpactModerateMajor Market Event

Connected Signals

Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight

BillStrong LinkNeutral

Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

Shared: Foreign Affairs · Defense Contractors · Committee Foreign· Both mention $LMT, $BA, $GD54% match
4/10
BillStrong LinkNeutral

Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Shared: Con Res · Military · Resolution· Both mention $LMT, $BA, $GD50% match
4/10
BillStrong LinkNeutral

Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

Shared: Military Engagement · Iran · Military47% match
3/10
BillStrong LinkNeutral

A concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2026 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2027 through 2035.

Shared: Con Res · Defense Contractors · Resolution· Both mention $LMT, $BA, $GD34% match
5/10
BillStrong LinkNeutral

A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.

Shared: Committee Foreign · Military Engagement · Military34% match
2/10
BillStrong LinkBearish

A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.

Shared: Military Engagement · Committee Foreign · Military· Both mention $LMT, $RTX, $BA34% match
4/10
BillStrong LinkNeutral

A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.

Shared: Military · Iran · Hostilities· Both mention $LMT, $RTX, $BA33% match
4/10
BillStrong LinkNeutral

A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.

Shared: Committee Foreign · Defense Contractors · Military· Both mention $LMT, $RTX, $BA31% match
4/10

Related Presidential Actions

Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies

presidential_memorandumApr 20, 2026

Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Domestic Petroleum Production, Refining, and Logistics Capacity

The President, under the authority of Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, has determined that domestic petroleum production, refining, and logistics capacity are essential for national defense. This action authorizes the Secretary of Energy to make purchases, commitments, and provide financial support to expand these capabilities, waiving certain DPA requirements to expedite the process.

presidential_memorandumApr 20, 2026

Presidential Determination Concerning the Air Force’s Jet Fighter Training Operations in Idaho, Oregon, and Nevada

President Trump, using authority under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1323), has exempted the Air Force's jet fighter training operations in Idaho, Oregon, and Nevada from federal, state, interstate, and local water pollution control requirements for a one-year period, effective April 20, 2026. This exemption does not apply to requirements under 33 U.S.C. 1316 and 1317, and the Secretary of the Air Force is directed to publish this determination.