A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
Summary
S.J. Res. 117 is an early-stage, low-probability bill directing withdrawal from unauthorized hostilities in Iran. Three prior identical resolutions failed discharge votes with 46-51 or 47-53 margins. The bill remains in committee with narrow Democratic sponsorship. Given near-zero passage odds, the bill has no material market impact currently. The real driver for defense stocks is the existing Iran conflict operational tempo, which this bill does not affect at this stage.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.S.J. Res. 117 has no realistic path to enactment — three identical bills already failed discharge votes by 5-7 vote margins.
- 2.Zero funding authorized. This is a policy directive, not a spending bill.
- 3.Defense stocks (LMT, NOC, RTX) have already declined 9-16% over the past 30 days, but this is unrelated to the bill's negligible passage odds.
- 4.Real market risk to defense sustainment revenue exists only if Iran hostilities de-escalate, not from this legislation.
Market Implications
No market implication. This bill is procedural and faces near-zero odds of passage. Defense prime contractors (LMT $509.35, NOC $576.06, RTX $174.77) have been declining over the past 30 days, but this reflects the trajectory of the Iran conflict and broader market dynamics, not legislative risk. Investors should ignore this bill for portfolio decisions. The real catalyst for defense stocks remains the actual operational tempo in the Middle East, which this legislation cannot alter at this legislative stage.
Full Analysis
S.J. Res. 117 was introduced March 5, 2026 by Sen. Schiff (D-CA) with 4 cosponsors, all Democrats. It was read twice and referred to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, where it remains. The bill directs the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Iran unless Congress has authorized war. Three prior identical resolutions — S.J. Res. 104, 114, and 116 — all failed discharge votes with margins of 46-51 to 47-53, indicating insufficient support to even force a floor vote. The current bill faces the same structural obstacle: 60 votes would be needed to overcome a filibuster, and even the discharge motions could not reach a simple majority.
The money trail is nonexistent — the bill authorizes zero funding. It is a policy directive, not a spending bill. If enacted, it would reduce defense sustainment revenue currently flowing from high-tempo CENTCOM operations, but the legislative path to enactment is effectively blocked.
Real market data shows defense stocks have already priced in the Iran conflict's impact: LMT has declined 15.72% over 30 days, NOC down 15.56%, RTX down 9.4%. These declines likely reflect broader market factors or profit-taking after earlier conflict-driven gains, not anticipation of this bill's passage. The bill's legislative status — stuck in committee with 5 Democratic sponsors — provides no basis for altering investment theses.
Timeline: The bill will likely remain in committee indefinitely. A discharge petition would require majority support that has failed three times already. No path to enactment exists in the current Congress unless Middle East conditions dramatically shift support, which is outside the range of analysis based on available legislative data.
Intelligence Surface
Cross-referenced against federal contracts, SEC insider filings & congressional trade disclosures
No confirming evidence found yet from contracts, insider trades, or congressional activity
What the bill does
Directive to remove U.S. Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities in Iran would reduce operational tempo and sustainment demand for airframes, missiles, and C4ISR systems deployed in the CENTCOM theater.
Who must act
U.S. Department of Defense — Central Command (CENTCOM) and logistics commands sustaining combat operations against Iran.
What happens
Reduced flight hours, weapons expenditure, and repair/replacement cycles for aircraft, munitions, and support equipment used in the Iran theater would lower near-term sustainment revenue flowing to prime contractors.
Stock impact
Lockheed Martin's Missiles and Fire Control division (HIMARS, ATACMS, GMLRS) and Aeronautics division (F-35, F-16 sustainment) are primary beneficiaries of the current high-tempo operations; a cease-fire or drawdown would reduce spares, upgrades, and munitions replenishment orders. Sustainment revenue from CENTCOM operations is estimated at 5–8% of LMT's annual defense segment revenue.
What the bill does
Same directive reduces sustainment demand for strategic systems, specifically B-2/B-21 bombers and missile defense interceptors deployed or in production for Iran contingency.
Who must act
U.S. Department of Defense — Air Force Global Strike Command and Missile Defense Agency operating in the CENTCOM area.
What happens
Reduced operational sorties for bombers and lower interceptor testing/fielding tempo in the Iran theater, decreasing near-term maintenance and upgrade contract volumes.
Stock impact
Northrop Grumman's Aeronautics Systems (B-21, B-2 sustainment) and Defense Systems (interceptors, battle management) segments benefit from current high alert status; a de-escalation removes urgency for accelerated production. B-21 production is under fixed-price development contract and is less sensitive to operational tempo, but sustainment and munitions orders would decrease.
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
Secure America Act
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
Stop Secret Spending Act of 2025
NASA Transition Authorization Act of 2025
Making appropriations for national security, Department of State, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2027, and for other purposes.
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide for balanced budgets for the Government.
To provide for a limitation on the transfer of defense articles and defense services to Israel.
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 101 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Recoverable Critical Minerals and Materials
This memorandum invokes the Defense Production Act (DPA) Section 101 to declare that recoverable critical minerals and materials (such as black mass, end-of-life rare-earth magnets, and scrap) are essential to national defense and that the U.S. cannot meet defense needs without disrupting civilian markets. It directs the Secretary of Commerce to issue regulations and take actions—including priority contracts and supply-chain interventions—to rapidly expand domestic recovery and processing of these materials, while explicitly excluding copper scrap already covered by a separate proclamation.
Further Strengthening Actions Taken to Adjust Imports of Aluminum into the United States
This proclamation modifies the Section 232 tariff regime on aluminum imports by authorizing the Secretary of Commerce to establish a program that incentivizes new U.S. investment in primary aluminum production. Companies with approved onshoring plans can import primary aluminum at half the standard Section 232 duty rate, up to the anticipated annual output of their new or expanded facilities, with construction required to start by January 20, 2029. The action aims to boost domestic primary aluminum supply for national security and defense industrial base needs.
Securing America’s Defense Supply Chains and Ensuring Domestic Acquisition of Critical Materials
This executive order restricts waivers for foreign-sourced critical materials in defense contracts, effective January 1, 2027, and mandates that defense contractors map their supply chains from raw materials to end products, vet subcontractors for risks, and prohibit covered materials from unreliable foreign suppliers. It directs the Secretary of War to enforce strict compliance, including requiring mitigation plans for any non-compliant materials and establishing penalties for fraud or willful noncompliance.
Free — no credit card
Get the next market-moving signal before the news does
HillSignal scores every Congressional bill, federal contract, and insider filing for market impact and emails you the high-conviction ones — free, no credit card.
Weekly digest — the congressional activity that actually moved markets that week, in plain English. Free, one email.
Free forever plan · No credit card · Unsubscribe in one click
Want the live terminal too? Create a free account →