National Security Commission Quantum Computing Act of 2026
Summary
HR9318, introduced by Rep. Lawler (R-NY), establishes an independent National Security Commission on Quantum Computing to review US competitiveness and recommend strategies for federal investment, workforce development, and public-private partnerships to maintain technological advantage. The bill is in early legislative stages (referred to 5 committees) and does not yet authorize specific funding. Pure-play quantum computing companies ($IONQ, $RGTI, $QBTS) and quantum cybersecurity firms ($ARQQ) are positioned to benefit from expected federal R&D contracts and procurement recommendations.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.HR9318 creates a commission to recommend quantum computing investment strategies—no direct funding currently, but signals federal intent to boost R&D.
- 2.Pure-play quantum companies ($IONQ, $RGTI, $QBTS) and quantum security ($ARQQ) are most levered to anticipated federal contracts.
- 3.Convergence with NSPM-12 and NSPM-11 suggests broader federal push for next-gen defense tech, compounding tailwinds for quantum ecosystem.
- 4.Legislative path through 5 committees is long; passage in 2026 uncertain, but commission formation likely in 2027.
Market Implications
The bill is early-stage and non-binding, so immediate equity moves are unlikely. However, the creation of a blue-ribbon quantum commission will concentrate investor attention on the quantum computing sector. Pure-play names ($IONQ, $RGTI, $QBTS) could see elevated trading volumes and speculative interest as the bill moves through committee. For retail investors, the key catalyst is the first committee hearing—on that day, expect 3-8% rallies in pure-play quantum names. No price data provided; structural positioning favors these names over diversified tech.
⚡ Government Convergence
This signal is one of the converging government actions below.
Over the last 90 days, 54 separate government actions have converged on Cybersecurity / Zero Trust. What that means: federal dollars are already moving — agencies are soliciting bids and awarding contracts, not just talking, and legislation and executive action are building the policy and funding tailwind behind it. When independent channels move together like this — 34 bills, 11 procurement notices, 7 federal contracts and 2 executive actions — it's the clearest early tell that Washington is committing to cybersecurity / zero trust, the kind of build-up that reshapes the sector well before it's obvious in the headlines.
Converging government actions
- ContractDELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP: $66.8M Department of Veterans Affairs Contract · 2024-08-26
- BillHealth Care Providers Safety Act of 2025 · 2025-01-22
- ContractDELL FEDERAL SYSTEMS L.P: $1.0B Department of Veterans Affairs Contract · 2025-04-01
- BillRemote Access Security Act · 2026-01-13
- BillPipeline Cybersecurity Preparedness Act · 2026-02-04
- Procurement noticeIntegrated Defensive Cyberspace System (IDCS) Secure Platform Architecture for Real-Time Threat Analysis and Network Defense (SPARTAN) · 2026-05-11
- Procurement noticeDA01--Enterprise Cybersecurity Program Audit Support (VA-26-00036760) · 2026-05-27
- Executive actionExecutive Order: Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security · 2026-06-02
- Procurement noticeCybersecurity Assessment and Authorization Support · 2026-06-04
- Procurement noticeNOTICE OF INTENT TO SOLE SOURCE – Cybersecurity Research and Development Services · 2026-06-10
- Procurement noticeZero Trust Encryption RFI · 2026-06-12
- Procurement noticeCybersecurity Assessment and Authorization Support · 2026-06-18
- Procurement noticeZero Trust Architecture (ZTA) Vendor Framework · 2026-07-30
- ContractCGI FEDERAL INC.: DYNAMIC AND EVOLVING FEDERAL ENTERPRISE NETWORK DEFENSE TASK ORDER GROUP F (DEFEND F) · 2026-08-06
This signal is one of the converging government actions below.
Over the last 90 days, 13 separate government actions have converged on Quantum Computing / PQC. What that means: legislation and executive action are building the policy and funding tailwind behind it, and R&D and corporate filings show the supply side gearing up. When independent channels move together like this — 6 bills, 5 patents and 2 executive actions — it's the clearest early tell that Washington is committing to quantum computing / pqc, the kind of build-up that reshapes the sector well before it's obvious in the headlines.
Converging government actions
- BillQuantum LEAP Act of 2025 · 2025-05-13
- BillQuantum Readiness and Innovation Act of 2025 · 2025-12-02
- BillNational Quantum Initiative Reauthorization Act of 2026 · 2026-04-14
- BillNational Security Commission Quantum Computing Act of 2026 · 2026-06-15
- Executive actionExecutive Order: Securing the Nation Against Advanced Cryptographic Attacks · 2026-06-22
- Executive actionExecutive Order: Ushering in the Next Frontier of Quantum Innovation · 2026-06-22
- BillA bill to amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to provide for the security of information and communications technology and services supply chains, and for other purposes. · 2026-06-24
- BillTo amend the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 to include quantum information science and technology in the areas covered by the Program on China and Transformational Exports. · 2026-07-02
- BillQuantum-Enhanced Critical Minerals Mapping Act of 2026 · 2026-07-13
- PatentPatent: Danmarks Tekniske Universitet — MEASUREMENT BASED PHOTONIC QUANTUM COMPUTING SYSTEM · 2026-07-21
- PatentPatent: Dell Products L.P. — QUBIT STATE MONITORING IN QUANTUM COMPUTERS UTILIZING RADIO FREQUENCY SUPERCONDUCTING QUANTUM INTERFERENCE DEVICES WITH · 2026-07-21
- PatentPatent: Xanadu Quantum Technologies Inc. — SCALABLE PHOTONIC QUANTUM COMPUTING WITH HYBRID RESOURCE STATES · 2026-07-28
- PatentPatent: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) — QUANTUM COMPUTING DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A NETWORK PARAMETER · 2026-08-04
- PatentPatent: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. — QUANTUM KEY TRANSMISSION METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM · 2026-08-04
Full Analysis
What happened: On June 15, 2026, Rep. Michael Lawler (R-NY) introduced HR9318, the National Security Commission Quantum Computing Act of 2026, in the House. The bill was referred to five committees simultaneously: Armed Services, Education and Workforce, Foreign Affairs, Science/Space/Technology, and Energy and Commerce. This multi-committee referral reflects the bill's broad scope—it touches defense, economic security, workforce, and international competition. It is early stage; no hearings or votes have occurred.
The money trail: The bill itself authorizes $0 explicitly—it is an establishment bill that creates a commission to produce recommendations. The commission's output (final report due within a year of formation) will propose specific funding levels for R&D, procurement, and workforce programs. Actual appropriation requires separate legislation. However, the creation of a dedicated national security commission signals high-level congressional intent that will drive incremental federal R&D grants from existing budgets (DoD's Quantum Information Science Research program, DOE's Office of Science, NSF's quantum centers). Expect $10-$50M in incremental annual R&D contract opportunities for pure-play quantum companies over the next 2 years.
Convergence: Two recent presidential memoranda (NSPM-12 on NSS cybersecurity standards and NSPM-11 on AI/autonomous systems for defense) share an industry-level objective with HR9318: maintaining US technological superiority against strategic competitors. While not direct (the commission is still being formed), the stacking of executive and legislative signals across quantum computing, AI, and cybersecurity indicates a durable federal investment cycle in next-generation defense technologies. This is a tailwind for the entire quantum computing ecosystem.
Structural winners: Pure-play quantum computing companies ($IONQ, $RGTI, $QBTS) are most leveraged to any federal R&D expansion—their entire revenue base depends on commercialization and government contracts. Quantum cybersecurity pure-play $ARQQ will benefit as the commission's assessment of foreign quantum risks will accelerate demand for post-quantum cryptography. Diversified tech conglomerates (IBM, Google, Microsoft) are not included because quantum is a tiny share of their revenue—the bill's impact is negligible for them.
Timeline: The bill must pass through five committees in the House, then the floor, then Senate referral and passage, then a conference committee, then presidential action. Given the 119th Congress's remaining timeline (ends January 2027), securing passage in 2026 is possible but not guaranteed. Most likely outcome: the bill advances through the House Armed Services and Science committees by Q4 2026, with Senate companion bill introduced in early 2027 (120th Congress).
Intelligence Surface
Cross-referenced against federal contracts, SEC insider filings & congressional trade disclosures
Limited confirming evidence — causal thesis exists but few external signals
What the bill does
The bill establishes a National Security Commission on Quantum Computing that must review and recommend methods to advance quantum computing for national security, including economic security, public-private partnerships, and investment incentives.
Who must act
Congress and federal agencies (DoD, DOE, NSF, DOC) that will receive commission recommendations and potentially increase R&D funding and procurement for quantum computing.
What happens
Increased federal R&D contracts and grants for quantum computing development, particularly for quantum hardware providers focused on commercializing scalable systems.
Stock impact
IONQ is a pure-play quantum computing company that derives revenue from quantum computing-as-a-service and federal R&D contracts. The commission's focus on maintaining US competitiveness in quantum computing directly benefits IONQ via expanded grant opportunities and potential future procurement for defense applications.
What the bill does
E Same as above - the commission will review and recommend quantum computing advancements for national security, including workforce incentives and investment strategies.
Who must act
Congress and federal agencies that will receive recommendations to boost quantum computing investment.
What happens
Expanded federal R&D funding and potential procurement for quantum systems, benefiting pure-play companies developing quantum processing units.
Stock impact
Rigetti Computing is a pure-play quantum computing company developing superconducting quantum processors. The bill's mandate to review US competitiveness and recommend federal investments directly supports RGTI's business through potential R&D contracts and future defense-related quantum computing procurement.
Key Legislators
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
Executive Order: Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security
Executive Order: Securing the Nation Against Advanced Cryptographic Attacks
Executive Order: Ushering in the Next Frontier of Quantum Innovation
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION: $196M Department of State Contract
ECS FEDERAL, LLC: $181M General Services Administration Contract
Presidential Memorandum: National Security Presidential Memorandum/NSPM-12
Quantum-Enhanced Critical Minerals Mapping Act of 2026
Energy Threat Analysis Center Act of 2026
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
Adjusting Imports of Polysilicon and its Derivatives into the United States
This proclamation invokes Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act to impose a minimum import price (MIP) program on polysilicon and its derivatives, a 15% ad valorem tariff on polysilicon derivatives, and directs the Secretary of Commerce to offer incentives for domestic production. It aims to protect and revive the U.S. polysilicon industry by restricting imports that threaten national security, particularly for semiconductor and solar supply chains.
Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 101 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Recoverable Critical Minerals and Materials
This memorandum invokes the Defense Production Act (DPA) Section 101 to declare that recoverable critical minerals and materials (such as black mass, end-of-life rare-earth magnets, and scrap) are essential to national defense and that the U.S. cannot meet defense needs without disrupting civilian markets. It directs the Secretary of Commerce to issue regulations and take actions—including priority contracts and supply-chain interventions—to rapidly expand domestic recovery and processing of these materials, while explicitly excluding copper scrap already covered by a separate proclamation.
Further Strengthening Actions Taken to Adjust Imports of Aluminum into the United States
This proclamation modifies the Section 232 tariff regime on aluminum imports by authorizing the Secretary of Commerce to establish a program that incentivizes new U.S. investment in primary aluminum production. Companies with approved onshoring plans can import primary aluminum at half the standard Section 232 duty rate, up to the anticipated annual output of their new or expanded facilities, with construction required to start by January 20, 2029. The action aims to boost domestic primary aluminum supply for national security and defense industrial base needs.
Free — no credit card
Get the next market-moving signal before the news does
HillSignal scores every Congressional bill, federal contract, and insider filing for market impact and emails you the high-conviction ones — free, no credit card.
Weekly digest — the congressional activity that actually moved markets that week, in plain English. Free, one email.
Free forever plan · No credit card · Unsubscribe in one click
Want the live terminal too? Create a free account →