SolicitationPosted May 21, 2026·Responses due Jun 3, 2026

Study on the Economic Impact of the International Maritime Organization Net Zero Framework

Transportation (all) · 693JF7 DOT MARITIME ADMINISTRATION

Stage
Open solicitation
NAICS
541720
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
693JF726R000015
Set-aside
No Set aside used
PSC
R405
Place
Washington, DC, USA
Contact
Christian Onwudiegwu (christian.onwudiegwu@dot.gov)
Loading your pipeline and notes…
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation 693JF726R000015 in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
None posted
Solicitation
  • May 4, 2026
    Solicitation
    Open
  • May 8, 2026
    Solicitation
    Open
  • May 21, 2026 · this notice
    Solicitation
  • May 29, 2026
    Solicitation
    Open
  • Sep 3, 2026
    Solicitation
    Open
Award
Not yet. Typical award: May 29, 2026 to Jun 27, 2026, middle of the range Jun 3, 2026.
Measured from 15 past solicitations at Maritime Administration that later posted an award (middle half of cases, counted from May 4, 2026).
Responses are due Jun 3, 2026, so an award before then is unlikely; past cases include short solicitations.

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Decide bid or no bid before the response deadline.
  • Look at the past winners for likely competitors and teaming partners.
  • Follow the opportunity to hear about amendments and the award.

What the notice says

The purpose of this amendment no. 0002 is to provide Q&As to this RFP. *****CAREFULLY REVIEW ENTIRE ATTACHED RFP***** The U.S. Maritime Administration is commissioning a targeted cost analysis of the International Maritime Organization�s (IMO) �Net Zero Framework� (NZF), adopted in April 2025, that centers on the NZF�s specific policy mechanisms and their economic consequences for the United States. The study should examine, at minimum, the NZF�s: (a) global GHG pricing/levy proposals (including scope, price trajectory, and pass-through mechanisms). (b) emissions trading and crediting systems.… (show all)

(c) use and role of carbon offsets and related crediting rules. (d) fuel/energy standard or fuel blending mandates. (e) technology mandates, exemptions, and phase in schedules. (f) monitoring, reporting, and verification, auditing and compliance regimes. (g) Fund governance, revenue collection, and allocation rules (including conditionality and funding flows to ports, projects, or countries); and (h) enforcement, penalties, and potential border or trade adjustment measures. MARAD is particularly interested in how each mechanism could: (1) alter operating and capital costs for U.S. flagged and U.S. dependent shipping and logistics; (2) affect import/export unit costs (TEU/ton) and trade competitiveness. (3) change demand for U.S. energy, technology, and maritime services. (4) create administrative and compliance burdens; and (5) risk leakage, double counting, or ineffective mitigation (for example, reliance on offsets that do not deliver measurable reductions). The study should quantify impacts where feasible, identify key assumptions and uncertainties for each mechanism, and analyze distributional effects across U.S. industries, ports, and regions. The contractor should compare outcomes under: (A) the NZF as proposed (mechanism by mechanism); (B) alternative designs that limit or reshape levy/offset components; and (C) delayed or phased implementation scenarios. For each mechanism, the study must recommend practical safeguards, alternative policy instruments, or design changes that would reduce unnecessary economic burdens on U.S. interests while maintaining emissions outcomes rooted in reality, and provide clear metrics and analytical methods that MARAD and U.S. negotiators can use to evaluate NZF proposals moving forward. For each mechanism, the study shall compare the proposed mechanism relative to a �No Action� approach to fully distinguish the costs and benefits to U.S. maritime, trade, and economic interests. *****CAREFULLY REVIEW ENTIRE ATTACHED RFP***** Submission Dates and Times. The deadline for proposal submission is 12:00 PM EDT on Wednesday, June 3, 2026. Please submit proposals in PDF format via email to: Christian Onwudiegwu at Christian.onwudiegwu@dot.gov and Kelly Mitchell-Caroll at K.mitchell-carroll@dot.gov. Do not send paper copies, or other media of the proposal via post office or delivery service. Proposals received by MARAD after the deadline will not be considered for award. An email will be deemed �received� by MARAD on the date and time the email was �sent� to the email address in Section E.7, below, as determined by MARAD�s servers. *****CAREFULLY REVIEW ENTIRE ATTACHED RFP*****

Who won similar work

11 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Transportation (all)), same industry group (NAICS 5417).

Single-winner award sizes (11): middle half $2.1M to $6.0M, median $5.7M; range $280K to $60.0M.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
THE MITRE CORPORATION2$4.4MMar 23, 2026
Various Washington KY USA1$60.0MAug 4, 2026
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY Fairfax VA 22030 USA1$18.0MMay 7, 2026
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.1$6.2MJul 1, 2026
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Ann Arbor MI 48109 USA1$5.7MOct 7, 2026
University Of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles CA 90024 USA1$5.7MOct 7, 2026
DERQ USA INC1$5.7MOct 7, 2026
Dunlap and Associates, Inc.1$2.2MNov 7, 2024
TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE College Station TX 77843 USA1$663KJan 15, 2025
The Center for American Interests and Policy Incorporated1$280KSep 14, 2026

Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.

Latest awards

Competitive landscape

For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 0 of these past winners lobbied Transportation, Dept of (DOT) since 2024 (0 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Transportation, Dept of (DOT) job
  • No corporate PAC money from them to the overseeing committees since 2024
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 1219 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.

  • 0 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.