Study on the Economic Impact of the International Maritime Organization Net Zero Framework
Transportation (all) · 693JF7 DOT MARITIME ADMINISTRATION
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation 693JF726R000015 in this department, oldest first.
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Decide bid or no bid before the response deadline.
- Look at the past winners for likely competitors and teaming partners.
- Follow the opportunity to hear about amendments and the award.
What the notice says
The purpose of this amendment no. 0003 is to provide Q&As to this RFP. The purpose of this amendment no. 0002 is to provide Q&As to this RFP. *****CAREFULLY REVIEW ENTIRE ATTACHED RFP***** The U.S. Maritime Administration is commissioning a targeted cost analysis of the International Maritime Organization�s (IMO) �Net Zero Framework� (NZF), adopted in April 2025, that centers on the NZF�s specific policy mechanisms and their economic consequences for the United States. The study should examine, at minimum, the NZF�s: (a) global GHG pricing/levy proposals (including scope, price trajectory, and… (show all)
pass-through mechanisms). (b) emissions trading and crediting systems. (c) use and role of carbon offsets and related crediting rules. (d) fuel/energy standard or fuel blending mandates. (e) technology mandates, exemptions, and phase in schedules. (f) monitoring, reporting, and verification, auditing and compliance regimes. (g) Fund governance, revenue collection, and allocation rules (including conditionality and funding flows to ports, projects, or countries); and (h) enforcement, penalties, and potential border or trade adjustment measures. MARAD is particularly interested in how each mechanism could: (1) alter operating and capital costs for U.S. flagged and U.S. dependent shipping and logistics; (2) affect import/export unit costs (TEU/ton) and trade competitiveness. (3) change demand for U.S. energy, technology, and maritime services. (4) create administrative and compliance burdens; and (5) risk leakage, double counting, or ineffective mitigation (for example, reliance on offsets that do not deliver measurable reductions). The study should quantify impacts where feasible, identify key assumptions and uncertainties for each mechanism, and analyze distributional effects across U.S. industries, ports, and regions. The contractor should compare outcomes under: (A) the NZF as proposed (mechanism by mechanism); (B) alternative designs that limit or reshape levy/offset components; and (C) delayed or phased implementation scenarios. For each mechanism, the study must recommend practical safeguards, alternative policy instruments, or design changes that would reduce unnecessary economic burdens on U.S. interests while maintaining emissions outcomes rooted in reality, and provide clear metrics and analytical methods that MARAD and U.S. negotiators can use to evaluate NZF proposals moving forward. For each mechanism, the study shall compare the proposed mechanism relative to a �No Action� approach to fully distinguish the costs and benefits to U.S. maritime, trade, and economic interests. *****CAREFULLY REVIEW ENTIRE ATTACHED RFP***** Submission Dates and Times. The deadline for proposal submission is 12:00 PM EDT on Wednesday, June 3, 2026. Please submit proposals in PDF format via email to: Christian Onwudiegwu at Christian.onwudiegwu@dot.gov and Kelly Mitchell-Caroll at K.mitchell-carroll@dot.gov. Do not send paper copies, or other media of the proposal via post office or delivery service. Proposals received by MARAD after the deadline will not be considered for award. An email will be deemed �received� by MARAD on the date and time the email was �sent� to the email address in Section E.7, below, as determined by MARAD�s servers. *****CAREFULLY REVIEW ENTIRE ATTACHED RFP*****
Who won similar work
11 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Transportation (all)), same industry group (NAICS 5417).
Single-winner award sizes (11): middle half $2.1M to $6.0M, median $5.7M; range $280K to $60.0M.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| THE MITRE CORPORATION | 2 | $4.4M | Mar 23, 2026 |
| Various Washington KY USA | 1 | $60.0M | Aug 4, 2026 |
| GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY Fairfax VA 22030 USA | 1 | $18.0M | May 7, 2026 |
| AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. | 1 | $6.2M | Jul 1, 2026 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Ann Arbor MI 48109 USA | 1 | $5.7M | Oct 7, 2026 |
| University Of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles CA 90024 USA | 1 | $5.7M | Oct 7, 2026 |
| DERQ USA INC | 1 | $5.7M | Oct 7, 2026 |
| Dunlap and Associates, Inc. | 1 | $2.2M | Nov 7, 2024 |
| TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE College Station TX 77843 USA | 1 | $663K | Jan 15, 2025 |
| The Center for American Interests and Policy Incorporated | 1 | $280K | Sep 14, 2026 |
Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.
- Oct 7, 2026University Of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles CA 90024 USA$5.7MIntersection Safety Systems (ISS) PrototypingNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Oct 7, 2026REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Ann Arbor MI 48109 USA$5.7MIntersection Safety Systems (ISS) PrototypingNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Oct 7, 2026DERQ USA INC$5.7MIntersection Safety Systems (ISS) PrototypingNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Sep 14, 2026The Center for American Interests and Policy Incorporated$280KStudy on the Economic Impact of the International Maritime Organization Net Zero FrameworkNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Aug 4, 2026Various Washington KY USA$60.0MRESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY TO PROMOTE SAFETY OF COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLES, DRIVERS, AND CARRIERSNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Jul 1, 2026AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.$6.2MDevelopment of an Automated Driving System (ADS) National Strategy for the National Park Service (NPS) Through the Use of Pilots in an Operational SettingNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- May 7, 2026GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY Fairfax VA 22030 USA$18.0MRoadside Safety Research and Federal Outdoor Impact Laboratory (FOIL) Advanced Crash Analysis Technical Support ServicesNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Mar 23, 2026THE MITRE CORPORATION$2.4MPartnership for Analytics Research in Traffic Safety (PARTS) Continued ResearchNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Jan 15, 2025TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE College Station TX 77843 USA$663KAnalysis of Truck Telematics Data to Identify Accident Hazard Roadway SegmentNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Jan 8, 2025THE MITRE CORPORATION$2.0MPartnership for Analytics Research in Traffic Safety (PARTS)No listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
Competitive landscape
For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 0 of these past winners lobbied Transportation, Dept of (DOT) since 2024 (0 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Transportation, Dept of (DOT) job
- No corporate PAC money from them to the overseeing committees since 2024
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 1219 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
- 0 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.