Unplug the Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Program Act
Summary
H.R. 1513 targets $7.5 billion in federal EV charging grants for repeal. The bill is in early committee stage but has a companion Senate bill, increasing its probability of advancement. Pure-play charging companies EVgo, ChargePoint, and Blink face direct revenue risk from the loss of NEVI and CFI capital co-funding. Tesla faces indirect headwinds from slower EV adoption, though its proprietary Supercharger network and vehicle sales buffer the impact.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.H.R. 1513 repeals $7.5B in unspent NEVI and CFI EV charging grants, directly threatening charging company growth pipelines.
- 2.Pure-play charging companies (EVGO, CHPT, BLNK) face 30-40% higher per-station capital costs and slower deployment without federal co-funding.
- 3.Tesla (TSLA) faces indirect headwind from slower EV adoption but is less exposed due to proprietary, self-funded Supercharger network.
- 4.Bill is early-stage with narrow Republican sponsorship but has a Senate companion, raising its legislative profile.
- 5.The charging sector's 7-day price declines (-3.67% to -10.13%) suggest the market is beginning to discount this legislative risk.
Market Implications
The EV charging sector is pricing in policy risk from H.R. 1513, as shown by the uniform 7-day decline across EVGO (-3.67%), CHPT (-6.46%), and BLNK (-10.13%) even after a strong 30-day rally. At current levels, EVGO at $2.10 (60% below its 52-week high) and CHPT at $6.52 (63% below high) already embed significant bearish assumptions. If the bill advances beyond committee, expect further compression toward the low end of the 52-week range — EVGO at $1.64, CHPT at $4.44, BLNK at $0.45. Tesla at $372.80 (25% below its high) has less direct charging exposure but would face additional headwind from slower EV adoption. For investors: the asymmetric risk is to the downside for pure-play charging names given the legislative uncertainty. The bull case would require the bill to stall in committee — a 60% probability given partisan composition and early stage. The bear case requires monitoring subsequent actions: if the bill receives a hearing or markup in T&I committee, the probability of passage rises, and the charging sector will reprice downward accordingly.
Full Analysis
H.R. 1513, introduced February 21, 2025 by Rep. Wied (R-WI), would repeal two major grant programs from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act: the NEVI Formula Program (~$5 billion) and the CFI Discretionary Grant Program (~$2.5 billion). The bill and its Senate companion S. 651 are both in early committee stages. The bill has 11 Republican cosponsors but no Democratic support, giving it a narrow partisan base. Action history shows referral to two committees (Transportation & Infrastructure; Energy & Commerce) and a subcommittee on Highways and Transit — standard early-stage procedural steps.
The funding mechanism is critical: NEVI provides formula grants to state DOTs with 80% federal cost-share for DC fast charging stations along designated alternative fuel corridors. CFI provides competitive grants for community-based infrastructure. Neither program has been fully obligated, so repeal would rescind unobligated balances — the text explicitly rescinds unobligated amounts under the NEVI heading.
Structural losers are pure-play charging companies whose business models depend on grant co-funding to achieve station-level economics. EVgo, ChargePoint, and Blink all have significant exposure to NEVI-corridor projects and CFI-awarded builds. Tesla faces a softer headwind: its Supercharger network is largely proprietary and self-funded, but slower overall charging infrastructure deployment from grant loss will reduce the EV adoption rate that drives Tesla vehicle sales. Tesla has also begun opening its network to non-Tesla EVs under federal compliance requirements.
Real market data shows the charging sector has been volatile: over the past 30 days, EVgo is up 26.51%, ChargePoint up 44.57%, and Blink up 42%, driven by broader EV sentiment. However, the 7-day trend is negative for all three: EVgo -3.67%, CHPT -6.46%, BLNK -10.13%, and TSLA -0.25%, suggesting the reintroduction of legislative risk is being priced in. Current prices are well below 52-week highs — EVgo at $2.10 vs $5.18 high, CHPT at $6.52 vs $17.78 high, BLNK at $0.71 vs $2.65 high, TSLA at $372.80 vs $498.83 high — indicating the sector already carries significant policy uncertainty premium.
Legislative timeline: The bill requires committee markup in both House T&I and Energy & Commerce, then House floor vote, then identical Senate passage. With a Republican House majority but only 11 GOP cosponsors and no Democratic support, the path is narrow. The companion Senate bill S. 651 raises the probability of eventual passage but still requires overcoming a 60-vote threshold in the Senate if filibustered. Passage in the 119th Congress is unlikely but not impossible if attached to a must-pass vehicle like a reconciliation bill or appropriations package.
Intelligence Surface
Cross-referenced against federal contracts, SEC insider filings & congressional trade disclosures
Some confirming evidence found across public data sources
What the bill does
Repeal of NEVI formula grants and CFI discretionary grants that provided capital for publicly accessible EV charging station deployment on highway corridors and in communities
Who must act
State departments of transportation, which administer NEVI formula funds; private charging operators like EVgo that rely on grant co-funding and the regulatory signal that federal investment drives private buildout
What happens
Elimination of a ~$5 billion authorized grant pool (NEVI) plus $2.5 billion CFI program eliminates the primary federal capital subsidy for DC fast charging deployment; removes the 80% federal cost-share that made station economics viable in early-stage markets
Stock impact
EVgo's business model depends on building and operating DC fast charging stations; NEVI grants directly co-funded ~30% of EVgo's planned station deployments in 2025-2026. Loss of federal capital shifts full cost burden to private capital, slowing station buildout and raising per-station cost by 30-40%.
What the bill does
Repeal of NEVI formula grants and CFI discretionary grants that provided capital for publicly accessible EV charging station deployment on highway corridors and in communities
Who must act
State DOTs and private charging network operators; ChargePoint sells charging hardware and subscription software to commercial customers and fleets that partially depended on federal cost-share programs
What happens
Loss of federal co-funding reduces site-host appetite for new installations, particularly along designated alternative fuel corridors where NEVI was the primary deployment catalyst
Stock impact
ChargePoint generates ~60% of revenue from commercial charging hardware sales. NEVI-adjacent corridor projects represented an estimated 20-25% of commercial sales pipeline. Reduction in federal co-funding will slow order conversion and lengthen customer payback periods.
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to repeal certain disclosure requirements related to conflict minerals, and for other purposes.
SELF DRIVE Act of 2026
Price Gouging Prevention Act of 2025
Safety is Not For Sale Act
Motor Vehicle Modernization Act of 2026
Securing Energy Supply Chains Act
DRIVER Act
Stop CARB Act of 2025
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
Further Adjusting the Tariff Regimes for Imports of Aluminum, Steel, and Copper into the United States
This proclamation modifies existing Section 232 tariffs on aluminum, steel, and copper imports by expanding the list of derivative products eligible for a reduced 15% duty to include agricultural equipment and residential HVAC systems, temporarily reducing tariffs on mobile industrial equipment, adding aluminum lithographic plates and steel racks to the derivative tariff coverage, and lowering the threshold for products to qualify as made 'entirely' from American metals from 95% to 85%.
Approving Critical Position Pay Authority for National Security Investment Workforce
This memorandum authorizes the Office of Personnel Management to allocate up to 400 critical positions with pay up to $400,000 to recruit specialized talent for national security investment programs, focusing on critical minerals, advanced materials, and strategic supply chains. It directs OPM and OMB to oversee allocation and ensure pay is used only to recruit or retain exceptionally qualified individuals. The action aims to accelerate domestic mineral production and reduce foreign dependence.
Removing Unnecessary and Counterproductive Restrictions on Access to Federal Lands
This executive order rescinds two 1970s-era executive orders (11644 and 11989) that required federal agencies to use vague environmental and social criteria when designating off-road vehicle use on federal lands. It directs the Secretaries of War, Interior, Agriculture, the TVA Board, and other relevant agency heads to initiate rulemakings to remove or revise regulations based on those criteria, aiming to increase access for energy, timber, utility maintenance, and recreation.