Loading the records…
Loading the records…
The Kids Off Social Media Act (HR7399) is an early-stage bill that would ban under-13 access to social media, mandate account deletion for that cohort, and prohibit personalized recommendation systems for users under 17. For ad-reliant platforms, this restricts a valuable youth demographic. The bill has a Senate companion (S278) already on the legislative calendar, increasing its probability of advancement, but it remains early in the process with no funding authorizations.
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Near-term market reaction to this bill has been muted as it's an early-stage referral. However, if the Senate companion bill (S278) advances to a floor vote, the probability of eventual passage rises materially. For retail investors, the key signal is not the bill itself but the Senate floor vote. A Senate passage would trigger reassessment of compliance costs and revenue impact for SNAP (12-15% of teens as users historically) and PINS (similar share). META's stock has broad-based institutional support and diversified growth pillars (Reels, messaging, ads infrastructure) that buffer the impact; a bearish trade on META solely on this bill would be overreaching. No real market data (price changes) is available in the enrichment data to cite, so investors should rely on structural exposure analysis.
1. What Happened and Current Status: On February 5, 2026, Rep. Luna introduced HR7399, the Kids Off Social Media Act. It has been referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, which is the first step in the legislative process. A companion bill, S278, is identical and has progressed further — it has been placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar, meaning it has cleared committee and is ready for floor consideration. This bicameral parallel structure signals coordinated effort, raising the bill's chance of eventual passage above a typical introduced bill, though passage is far from certain in the current divided Congress.
2. The Money Trail — No Authorization to Appropriate: This bill authorizes zero spending. It imposes regulatory mandates on private companies. The compliance burden includes developing age-verification systems, modifying recommendation algorithms to exclude personal data for under-17s, and purging existing under-13 data. Companies will incur one-time implementation costs and potential ongoing revenue loss from the restricted demographic. The Federal Trade Commission is directed to enforce the provisions, but no additional appropriation to the FTC is mandated.
3. Structural Winners and Losers: The primary losers are social media platforms where a meaningful portion of user engagement and advertising revenue comes from users under 17. Pure-play social media companies with younger-skewing demographics — Snapchat ($SNAP) and Pinterest ($PINS) — face the largest relative revenue exposure given their concentrated ad business. Meta has a more diversified platform portfolio and significant regulatory compliance infrastructure, but its Instagram and Facebook platforms will also be affected, particularly Instagram's exploration of a teen-focused product. Alphabet faces impact primarily through YouTube, though the diversified revenue stream blunts the effect. Potential beneficiaries include age-verification technology providers (e.g., $ID verification software companies, but no publicly traded pure-play is large enough to materially move a stock). Traditional children's entertainment companies ($DIS, $NFLX, $NIL) may see a competitive edge if platforms lose youth engagement, but this is indirect and low-confidence. The bill does not restrict children's access to platforms that are not defined as 'social media' (e.g., streaming, gaming).
4. Competitive Landscape: The bill defines 'social media platform' narrowly: a public-facing website/application that collects personal data, primarily derives revenue from advertising or data sales, and has content sharing as a primary function. This likely excludes major competitors for children's digital time: YouTube Kids (separate app, but might be covered if it fits criteria), TikTok (also covered, but not a US-public company), streaming services (Netflix, Disney+), and gaming platforms (Roblox, Fortnite). The uneven playing field could push teen users toward unregulated platforms, potentially reducing the competitive moat of regulated social media giants. However, the bill allows for state-level enforcement, leading to possible fragmentation.
5. Timeline: The bill in the House is at the earliest stage — referred to committee. The Senate companion bill is further along, awaiting floor time. Floor vote in the Senate is possible but not guaranteed this session. For market impact to be realized, the bill must pass both chambers and be signed into law. Given its early stage, near-term earnings impact is unlikely. If signed, the effective date is typically 18 months post-enactment (common for such bills), giving platforms a transition period.
Cross-referenced against federal contracts, SEC insider filings & congressional trade disclosures
No confirming evidence found yet from contracts, insider trades, or congressional activity
What the bill does
Same prohibition on under-13 accounts; deletion of data; prohibition on personalized recommendation systems for under-17 users based on personal data.
Who must act
Snap Inc. as operator of Snapchat, a platform heavily used by teens.
What happens
Snapchat's core demographic skews younger; a disproportionate share of its DAUs are under 18. The personalized recommendation ban directly impacts Snapchat's content discovery (e.g., Spotlight, Stories ranking). The age verification requirement creates friction in user acquisition. Ad revenue from teen-targeted campaigns may decline.
Stock impact
Snap generates ~99% of revenue from advertising. Teen engagement is a key driver of its user metrics. Constraints on personalization for under-17 users will likely reduce time spent and ad inventory quality for that segment. With Snap's smaller revenue base (~$5B FY2025 implied), the relative impact could be larger than for Meta.
What the bill does
Same prohibition on under-13 accounts; deletion of data; prohibition on personalized recommendation for under-17 users based on personal data.
Who must act
Pinterest as operator of a visual discovery platform used by teens.
What happens
Pinterest's recommendation system (personalized pins, home feed) must be disabled for under-17 users. The platform's utility for teen users is heavily dependent on algorithmic discovery. Age verification creates sign-up friction.
Stock impact
Pinterest's ad revenue (~$3.5B FY2025 implied) relies on user engagement and targeting. Teen usage, while not majority, contributes to total engagement. The personalized ban for under-17s will reduce that segment's time on platform, lowering ad inventory.
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
No Fentanyl on Social Media Act
A bill to require social media platform providers to obtain parental consent with respect to children creating or maintaining accounts or profiles on their platforms, and for other purposes.
To amend the Foreign Agents Registration Act to require social media influencers to submit registration statements, and for other purposes.
Sammy’s Law
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
The President invokes Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act to declare that imports of robotics, industrial machinery, and their components threaten national security, and directs the Secretary of Commerce and USTR to negotiate agreements with trading partners to adjust these imports, potentially leading to tariffs or quotas within 180 days.
This proclamation initiates negotiations to adjust imports of wind turbines and their components under Section 232, citing national security concerns including cybersecurity vulnerabilities, radar interference, and grid reliability. It does not immediately impose tariffs but sets the stage for potential trade restrictions, and notes that certain wind turbine components made of aluminum, steel, or copper are already subject to existing tariffs.
This executive order establishes a Women's Health Division within the NIH to coordinate and accelerate research on understudied women's health conditions, and creates a White House Women's Health Task Force to drive policy reforms and translation of research into clinical practice across federal agencies. It directs specific agencies to prioritize research, data collection, and translation into prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, with a focus on all life stages from infancy through aging.
Free — no credit card
HillSignal scores every Congressional bill, federal contract, and insider filing for market impact and emails you the high-conviction ones — free, no credit card.
Weekly digest — the congressional activity that actually moved markets that week, in plain English. Free, one email.
Free forever plan · No credit card · Unsubscribe in one click
Want the live terminal too? Create a free account →