A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
Summary
The Senate's 47-53 rejection of SJRES104 on March 4, 2026, was a procedural outcome that maintains the military status quo with Iran. The resolution, which would have directed removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities, failed to advance. This event has no material impact on defense contractor financials. The 30-day sell-off in defense primes ($LMT -15.72%, $NOC -15.61%, $RTX -9.41% as of April 30) is unrelated to this procedural vote and likely driven by separate budget dynamics.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.SJRES104 is dead — the 47-53 vote to discharge is a procedural rejection; no path to passage
- 2.Zero dollar impact — this resolution authorized no funding and directed no spending
- 3.Defense prime sell-off ($LMT -15.72%, $NOC -15.61%, $RTX -9.41% over 30 days) is unrelated to this procedural vote
- 4.All three major defense primes operate under the same contract structure as before March 4
- 5.No catalyst for defense stock movement from this event — look to FY2027 budget or broader market factors
Market Implications
The rejection of SJRES104 produces zero marginal market impact for defense contractors. The 30-day sell-off in $LMT ($509.36), $NOC ($575.76), and $RTX ($174.75) as of April 30, 2026, should not be attributed to this failed procedural vote. The sell-off magnitude (-15.72%, -15.61%, -9.41%) exceeds any conceivable effect from a resolution that never reached the floor. Investors should look to FY2027 defense appropriations, U.S.-Iran geopolitical developments, and broader market rotation for explanations of the defense sector price action. No tradeable signal for any ticker emerges from this event.
Full Analysis
SJRES104 was a joint resolution introduced by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) on January 29, 2026, with 27 cosponsors. The bill directed the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Iran unless Congress explicitly authorized such actions via a declaration of war or specific AUMF. The resolution exempted self-defense operations. On March 4, 2026, a motion to discharge the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations failed 47-53 (Record Vote 46). The bill never reached the floor for a direct vote on its merits. This is a procedural death — the resolution is stalled in committee with no viable path forward. No funding was authorized or appropriated by this resolution. It was purely a restriction on executive branch military action. Because the resolution failed, there is precisely zero dollar impact on any defense program or contractor. The money trail does not exist — no funds changed hands, no contracts were signed or cancelled.
The real market data shows a significant 30-day sell-off across defense primes: Lockheed Martin ($LMT) dropped from $592.19 on April 17 to $509.36 on April 30 (-15.72%); Northrop Grumman ($NOC) fell from $665.26 to $575.76 (-15.61%); RTX Corporation ($RTX) declined from $196.42 to $174.74 (-9.41%). These moves should not be interpreted as a market reaction to SJRES104. The resolution failed three weeks before this sell-off began and had no funding mechanism. The sell-off coincides with late-April 2026 and is likely driven by separate factors — possibly FY2027 defense budget negotiations, broader market rotation, or sector-specific news not provided in this dataset. There are no structural winners or losers from this bill. The three major defense primes — Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and RTX — operate under the same contract portfolio and operational environment they had before the vote. No company gained competitive advantage or lost market position. No new procurement cycle was triggered. No program was canceled. The bill's failure simply means the Executive Branch retains its existing Iran-related military posture under existing AUMF authorities.
Intelligence Surface
Cross-referenced against federal contracts, SEC insider filings & congressional trade disclosures
No confirming evidence found yet from contracts, insider trades, or congressional activity
What the bill does
legislative status quo maintained via procedural rejection of force withdrawal resolution
Who must act
U.S. Department of Defense under existing AUMF authority
What happens
no change to current Iran-related military operations or procurement contracts for Lockheed Martin's missile defense, F-35, or Aegis programs
Stock impact
Lockheed's missile defense and F-35 production run continue under existing contracts; no new constraints or accelerants from this vote
What the bill does
legislative status quo maintained via procedural rejection of force withdrawal resolution
Who must act
U.S. Department of Defense under existing AUMF authority
What happens
no disruption to Northrop Grumman's B-21, GBSD Sentinel, or Iran-related ISR and electronic warfare programs
Stock impact
Northrop's long-cycle development programs (B-21, Sentinel) face no new funding or authorization risk from this vote; the status quo is neutral for these programs
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
Restoring Reciprocity in Government Procurement
This Presidential Memorandum directs the Office of Management and Budget, the U.S. Trade Representative, and other federal agencies to identify and remove Canadian-origin items from federal civil procurement where possible, citing Canada's 'Buy Canadian' policies as discriminatory. It also requires agencies to be notified of domestic alternatives and mandates ongoing monitoring of Canada's procurement practices, with provisions for restoring access if Canada changes its policies.
Accelerating Access To Veterans' Benefits And Employment Opportunities
This proclamation orders the Secretaries of War and Veterans Affairs to mandate rapid, ongoing digital sharing of military personnel and medical records, deploy AI-powered tools for benefits applications, and update existing IT contracts for interoperability. It also requires the Transition Assistance Program to connect separating service members to specific jobs or training programs before discharge.
Adjusting Certain Delegations Under the Defense Production Act
This proclamation amends Executive Order 13603 to share authority under the Defense Production Act for energy matters between the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Energy, allowing each to act independently, and directs inter-agency dispute resolution via the National Energy Dominance Council and National Security Council, with coordination from the Department of War when national defense is implicated.
Free — no credit card
Get the next market-moving signal before the news does
HillSignal scores every Congressional bill, federal contract, and insider filing for market impact and emails you the high-conviction ones — free, no credit card.
Weekly digest — the congressional activity that actually moved markets that week, in plain English. Free, one email.
Free forever plan · No credit card · Unsubscribe in one click
Want the live terminal too? Create a free account →