James T. Woods Act
Summary
The James T. Woods Act (HR6719) creates new federal criminal offenses for threatening to distribute child sexual abuse material to coerce minors. The bill is currently on the Senate Legislative Calendar after passing the House by voice vote. It authorizes no direct spending and imposes compliance obligations on online platforms, but the impact on major tech companies is neutral given existing moderation investments.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.HR6719 creates new criminal penalties for CSAM-related threats but authorizes no spending.
- 2.Major tech platforms already have compliance infrastructure; incremental costs are minimal.
- 3.Bill is on Senate calendar after House voice vote; passage probability is moderate but not transformative for markets.
Market Implications
The bill's impact on markets is negligible. No direct spending, no tax changes, no regulatory relief. The only potential effect is a slight increase in legal risk for online platforms, but this is already priced into the regulatory environment. Investors should focus on other catalysts for tech stocks.
Full Analysis
The James T. Woods Act, introduced as HR6719 in the 119th Congress, passed the House on January 12, 2026, by voice vote under suspension of the rules. It was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar on March 2, 2026 (Calendar No. 346). The bill amends 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252 and 2252A to criminalize knowingly distributing, offering, sending, or providing a threat to distribute CSAM with the intent that the minor create or transmit new CSAM. This is a criminal law expansion, not an authorization of new spending. The bill does not appropriate or authorize any funds—it creates new penalties. The primary obligated parties are online platforms that host user-generated content, as they face increased legal risk if such threats are not detected and removed. However, major platforms like Meta (META), Google (GOOGL), and Microsoft (MSFT) already have substantial content moderation systems and legal compliance teams. The incremental cost of monitoring for this specific type of threat is marginal relative to their existing investments. Smaller platforms or those with less robust moderation may face higher relative costs, but no pure-play public companies in that category are identifiable from the bill text. The legislative path forward: the bill is on the Senate calendar, meaning it can be brought to the floor for a vote. Given the bipartisan nature (voice vote in House) and the presence of related Senate bills (S3704, S3397, S3398, S3394), passage is plausible but not guaranteed. No market-moving impact is expected from this legislation.
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
Restoring Reciprocity in Government Procurement
This Presidential Memorandum directs the Office of Management and Budget, the U.S. Trade Representative, and other federal agencies to identify and remove Canadian-origin items from federal civil procurement where possible, citing Canada's 'Buy Canadian' policies as discriminatory. It also requires agencies to be notified of domestic alternatives and mandates ongoing monitoring of Canada's procurement practices, with provisions for restoring access if Canada changes its policies.
Providing Meaningful Water Quality Improvements Through Collaboration and Oversight of Federal Support
This executive order revokes Executive Order 13508, which had mandated Chesapeake Bay restoration efforts, and directs federal agencies to prioritize funding for direct, on-the-ground water quality projects. It also instructs the EPA to work with states to assess and encourage the repeal of stormwater management fees (rain taxes) that have burdened residents, aiming to reduce costs while maintaining environmental progress.
Adjusting Certain Delegations Under the Defense Production Act
This proclamation amends Executive Order 13603 to share authority under the Defense Production Act for energy matters between the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Energy, allowing each to act independently, and directs inter-agency dispute resolution via the National Energy Dominance Council and National Security Council, with coordination from the Department of War when national defense is implicated.
Free — no credit card
Get the next market-moving signal before the news does
HillSignal scores every Congressional bill, federal contract, and insider filing for market impact and emails you the high-conviction ones — free, no credit card.
Weekly digest — the congressional activity that actually moved markets that week, in plain English. Free, one email.
Free forever plan · No credit card · Unsubscribe in one click
Want the live terminal too? Create a free account →