Homeland Security Climate Change Coordination Act

1) What happened and its current status: HR3002 was introduced in the House on April 24, 2025, by Rep. Goldman (D-NY) with 4 cosponsors. It was referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security, then to the Subcommittee on Emergency Management and Technology on the same day. There have been no further actions since April 24, 2025 — over one year of legislative dormancy. The bill remains an early-stage, low-priority authorization with no Senate companion. 2) The money trail: The bill authorizes exactly $0 in funding. It creates an internal coordinating council of at least 20 senior DHS officials from existing components (CBP, FEMA, TSA, Coast Guard, etc.) but mandates no new contracts, no new grants, no new procurement programs, and no tax incentives. It is a purely administrative reorganization of existing personnel within existing budgets. Without an appropriations component or any dollar amount, there is no revenue opportunity for any company. 3) Structural winners and losers: There are none. The bill does not direct any spending, does not create any regulatory mandate on private industry, and does not authorize any new technology adoption. The climate council is an internal DHS body whose purpose is to 'coordinate departmental efforts' — not to purchase goods or services. No ticker belongs in this analysis because no causal chain exists from this bill to any company's revenue. 4) Real market data analysis: The provided market data for $LDOS, $CACI, and $LMT shows these defense contractors are already under pressure independent of HR3002. $LMT has lost 15.6% in 30 days, $LDOS is down 5.61%, and $CACI is down 6.1%. These movements reflect broader defense sector headwinds (likely budget uncertainty), not any impact from this dormant climate coordination bill. 5) Timeline: HR3002 faces an uphill path. It must pass the Homeland Security Committee, receive a House floor vote, pass the Senate (with no companion bill introduced), and be signed by the President. Given zero action for over 12 months since referral, the bill is effectively stalled. Even if revived, its lack of any funding mechanism means it would remain a procedural bill with zero market impact.