Gun Owner Registration Information Protection Act
Summary
S.3916 (Gun Owner Registration Information Protection Act) is an early-stage bill prohibiting federal funding for state firearm ownership databases. With no appropriated funding, no mandates on private companies, and a long legislative path ahead, the direct market impact is negligible. No material revenue effects for any publicly traded company.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.S.3916 is a narrow, early-stage prohibition bill with zero funding and no private sector mandates.
- 2.No publicly traded company has material revenue exposure to federal grants for state firearm ownership databases.
- 3.Market impact is effectively zero until the bill advances significantly—currently a non-event for investors.
Market Implications
No near-term market implications. This bill does not create or destroy revenue for any publicly traded company. Investors should ignore S.3916 until substantive legislative progress (committee passage or floor vote) occurs, which is unlikely in the current Congress.
Full Analysis
-
What happened: On February 25, 2026, Senator Hyde-Smith (R-MS) introduced S.3916. The bill was read twice and referred to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. It is at the earliest legislative stage. A companion House bill (H.R. 7678) exists, creating a parallel track, but no hearings or markups have occurred.
-
The money trail: This bill does not authorize or appropriate any funding. Its entire mechanism is a prohibition—federal agencies cannot fund or support state firearm ownership databases. There is zero dollars allocated. The economic effect is purely the elimination of potential future federal grants to states for a narrow category of IT projects. No private sector revenue streams are established, redirected, or eliminated.
-
Structural winners and losers: The bill's effect on the private sector is indirect and marginal. IT vendors selling to state governments ($ANET, $SSTK, $SMCI) could see a microscopic reduction in potential demand from a small subset of state database projects. However, these projects represent an inconsequential fraction of their state & local revenue. No company has significant revenue exposure specifically tied to federal grants for state firearm databases. The bill's exemption for lost/stolen firearm databases means some state database work is still eligible for federal support.
-
Market data: No real market data provided. The bill's passage probability is low given the 119th Congress's divided control and the bill's partisan sponsorship (all Republican cosponsors). Even if passed, the economic impact would be measured in single-digit millions of federal grant dollars eliminated—not enough to move any publicly traded company's financials.
-
Timeline: The bill must clear committee markup, pass the Senate (requires 60 votes to overcome filibuster), pass the House, and be signed by the President. Given the early stage and partisan sponsorship, 2026 passage is unlikely. No catalyst imminent.
Intelligence Surface
Cross-referenced against federal contracts, SEC insider filings & congressional trade disclosures
No confirming evidence found yet from contracts, insider trades, or congressional activity
What the bill does
Prohibition on federal funding or support for state firearm ownership databases
Who must act
State governments and their IT procurement agencies
What happens
States may reduce or reallocate IT spending that would have been used to build or maintain firearm registration databases, shifting demand toward other state IT projects or reducing total state IT procurement.
Stock impact
Arista Networks sells networking equipment and software to state/local government. If database projects are defunded, it removes a potential incremental demand source. However, this bill only prohibits federal dollars for these specific databases—state self-funded projects could continue, and the immediate impact on Arista's state & local revenue is negligible.
What the bill does
Prohibition on federal funding or support for state firearm ownership databases
Who must act
State governments and their IT procurement agencies
What happens
State technology projects reliant on federal grants for database systems under this specific category lose federal backing; states must use own funds or cancel projects, shifting IT spending patterns at the margin.
Stock impact
SHI International is a major reseller of IT hardware, software, and services to state/local government. Defunding specific database projects modestly reduces a potential procurement pipeline, but SHI's broad state contract portfolio (unrelated to firearms databases) dwarfs any impact. The effect is negligible on SHI's overall revenue.
Key Legislators
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
Stop Stealing our Chips Act
FERMI FORWARD DISCOVERY GROUP, LLC: $2.4B Department of Energy Contract
SPENCER CONSTRUCTION LLC: $1.1B Department of Homeland Security Contract
FISHER SAND & GRAVEL CO: $1.6B Department of Homeland Security Contract
FISHER SAND & GRAVEL CO: $2.6B Department of Homeland Security Contract
COCHRANE USA INC: $641M Department of Homeland Security Contract
Presidential Memorandum: Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Coal Supply Chains and Baseload Power Generation Capacity
BARNARD SPENCER JOINT VENTURE: $634M Department of Homeland Security Contract
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
National Security Presidential Memorandum/NSPM-11
This memorandum directs the national security enterprise (including the Department of War, intelligence agencies, and others) to accelerate the adoption, adaptation, and assurance of AI technologies for military and intelligence missions. It mandates updates to DOD Directive 3000.09 on autonomous weapons within 90 days, requires termination of contracts with companies that repeatedly violate policy (e.g., by enabling adversary control or embedding bias), and emphasizes supply chain resilience and multi-vendor sourcing to avoid single-vendor dependencies.
Strengthening Customs Enforcement
This executive order directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to revise customs enforcement regulations within 180 days, requiring importers of record (IORs) to maintain minimum tangible domestic assets or bonding, disclose ownership and business affiliations, and maintain good standing with CBP. It prohibits foreign IORs from filing informal entries for low-value articles and imposes additional bonding and CTPAT validation requirements for foreign IORs on formal entries, aiming to enhance compliance and revenue collection.
Implementing Schedule Policy/Career in the Excepted Service
This executive order expands the Schedule Policy/Career excepted service category, transferring certain federal positions from competitive service to at-will employment to facilitate removal for poor performance or misconduct. It directs agency heads to petition for reclassification of policy-influencing roles, mandates performance bonus pools for these employees, and amends civil service rules to exempt them from standard adverse action procedures.