Alyssa’s Act of 2025
Summary
Alyssa's Act of 2025 is an early-stage bill that expands the federal school safety clearinghouse and mandates a panic alarm technology program. It authorizes no specific funding and has been referred to multiple committees. Market impact is negligible until appropriations are passed.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.Alyssa's Act is an early-stage bill with no funding authorization, limiting near-term market impact.
- 2.The bill expands the school safety clearinghouse and mandates a panic alarm technology program, but all activities depend on future appropriations.
- 3.No specific companies or vendors are named, making direct investment implications speculative.
Market Implications
The bill has no immediate market implications. It is a policy directive without funding, and its provisions are too broad to create identifiable winners or losers. Investors should monitor whether a companion bill emerges in the Senate or if appropriations language is added in future DHS funding bills. Until then, this is a non-event for public markets.
Full Analysis
-
What happened: On December 17, 2025, Rep. Owens (R-UT) introduced H.R. 6809, titled 'Alyssa's Act of 2025', which amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to expand the Federal Clearinghouse on School Safety Evidence-Based Practices. The bill was referred to four committees: Education and Workforce, Judiciary, Homeland Security, and Oversight and Government Reform. On December 18, it was further referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence. The bill is in early legislative stages with no further action since December 2025.
-
The money trail: The bill authorizes NO specific funding. It directs the DHS Secretary to expand the clearinghouse, provide training and technical assistance, hire subject matter experts, and develop a panic alarm technology program. However, all of these activities require separate appropriations from Congress. Without an authorization of appropriations, the bill is a policy directive only. Actual spending would need to be included in future DHS appropriations bills.
-
Structural winners and losers: The bill's provisions are too vague and unfunded to create clear winners or losers. Technology companies with education and government cloud offerings (Microsoft, Google, Amazon) could potentially benefit if future appropriations fund the clearinghouse or panic alarm program, but no contracts are specified. School safety hardware vendors (e.g., alarm systems, access control) could also be affected, but no specific companies are named. The bill does not mandate any particular technology or vendor.
-
Competitive landscape: The school safety technology market includes many players, from large tech firms to specialized security companies. Without funding, the bill does not shift competitive dynamics. The panic alarm technology program could eventually create a market for mobile panic buttons, silent alarms, and integrated communication systems, but this is years away and contingent on appropriations.
-
Timeline: The bill has not moved since December 2025. It must pass through four committees and then the full House and Senate before reaching the President. Given the early stage and lack of funding authorization, passage in the 119th Congress is uncertain. Even if passed, appropriations would be needed in a subsequent bill.
Key Legislators
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
Secure America Act
FERMI FORWARD DISCOVERY GROUP, LLC: $2.4B Department of Energy Contract
SPENCER CONSTRUCTION LLC: $1.1B Department of Homeland Security Contract
FISHER SAND & GRAVEL CO: $1.6B Department of Homeland Security Contract
FISHER SAND & GRAVEL CO: $2.6B Department of Homeland Security Contract
COCHRANE USA INC: $641M Department of Homeland Security Contract
Presidential Memorandum: Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Coal Supply Chains and Baseload Power Generation Capacity
BARNARD SPENCER JOINT VENTURE: $634M Department of Homeland Security Contract
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
National Security Presidential Memorandum/NSPM-11
This memorandum directs the national security enterprise (including the Department of War, intelligence agencies, and others) to accelerate the adoption, adaptation, and assurance of AI technologies for military and intelligence missions. It mandates updates to DOD Directive 3000.09 on autonomous weapons within 90 days, requires termination of contracts with companies that repeatedly violate policy (e.g., by enabling adversary control or embedding bias), and emphasizes supply chain resilience and multi-vendor sourcing to avoid single-vendor dependencies.
Strengthening Customs Enforcement
This executive order directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to revise customs enforcement regulations within 180 days, requiring importers of record (IORs) to maintain minimum tangible domestic assets or bonding, disclose ownership and business affiliations, and maintain good standing with CBP. It prohibits foreign IORs from filing informal entries for low-value articles and imposes additional bonding and CTPAT validation requirements for foreign IORs on formal entries, aiming to enhance compliance and revenue collection.
Implementing Schedule Policy/Career in the Excepted Service
This executive order expands the Schedule Policy/Career excepted service category, transferring certain federal positions from competitive service to at-will employment to facilitate removal for poor performance or misconduct. It directs agency heads to petition for reclassification of policy-influencing roles, mandates performance bonus pools for these employees, and amends civil service rules to exempt them from standard adverse action procedures.