A bill to direct the Secretary of the Interior to carry out a feasibility study on a selective water withdrawal system at Glen Canyon Dam, and for other purposes.
Summary
S3743 is a procedural bill requiring a feasibility study for a selective water withdrawal system at Glen Canyon Dam, with no authorized construction funding and no direct impact on any publicly traded company. The bill remains in early committee stage and has no market-moving provisions.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.S3743 is a study-only bill with zero authorized construction dollars
- 2.Identifies no funding source for the study—only directs the Secretary to find already-appropriated funds
- 3.No publicly traded company is directly impacted at any stage of this legislation
Market Implications
No market implications. This bill is purely procedural and does not affect any publicly traded company's revenue, costs, or competitive positioning. Retail investors should not make any portfolio adjustments based on this legislation.
Full Analysis
-
What happened and its current status: Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) introduced S3743 on January 29, 2026. It was referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, and a subcommittee hearing was held on March 17, 2026. The bill orders a feasibility study for a selective water withdrawal system at Glen Canyon Dam to optimize hydropower generation and prevent invasive species entrainment. It remains in committee with no floor votes scheduled. An identical companion bill, HR8113, exists in the House.
-
The money trail: The bill explicitly authorizes no construction and no appropriated funds for any project. It directs the Secretary of the Interior to identify funding sources within 90 days for the feasibility study, with costs paid by the Secretary using already-appropriated funds. The bill explicitly states funds shall be 'nonreimbursable and nonreturnable' to the US government. There is no new spending authorized or appropriated.
-
Structural winners and losers: Because this is a study-only bill with no authorization for construction, no procurement, and no new funding, there are no direct winners or losers among publicly traded companies. Any potential impact from a future selective water withdrawal system would require: (a) a finding of feasibility, (b) concurrence from Colorado River Storage Project power contractors, and (c) separate authorization and appropriation for construction. All of those steps are years away, if they occur at all.
-
Competitive landscape: The Colorado River Storage Project power contractors include the Western Area Power Administration (a federal power marketing agency) and municipal/cooperative utilities such as Salt River Project (not publicly traded), Tri-State G&T (cooperative), and others. These entities are not publicly traded companies.
-
Timeline: The bill must pass the full Senate, then the House (or the identical HR8113), then be signed by the President. Even if passed, the feasibility study has 18 months from enactment to completion. Construction would require additional legislation and appropriations, likely years later.
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
FISHER SAND & GRAVEL CO: $2.6B Department of Homeland Security Contract
Presidential Memorandum: Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Natural Gas Transmission, Processing, Storage, and Liquefied Natural Gas Capacity
Presidential Memorandum: Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Development, Manufacturing, and Deployment of Large-Scale Energy and Energy‑Related Infrastructure
Presidential Memorandum: Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Domestic Petroleum Production, Refining, and Logistics Capacity
COCHRANE USA INC: $641M Department of Homeland Security Contract
Presidential Memorandum: Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Coal Supply Chains and Baseload Power Generation Capacity
Applied Aerospace & Defense ($AADX) Prices $650M IPO on NYSE at $3.5B Valuation
Executive Order: Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
Implementing Schedule Policy/Career in the Excepted Service
This executive order expands the Schedule Policy/Career excepted service category, transferring certain federal positions from competitive service to at-will employment to facilitate removal for poor performance or misconduct. It directs agency heads to petition for reclassification of policy-influencing roles, mandates performance bonus pools for these employees, and amends civil service rules to exempt them from standard adverse action procedures.
Further Adjusting the Tariff Regimes for Imports of Aluminum, Steel, and Copper into the United States
This proclamation modifies existing Section 232 tariffs on aluminum, steel, and copper imports by expanding the list of derivative products eligible for a reduced 15% duty to include agricultural equipment and residential HVAC systems, temporarily reducing tariffs on mobile industrial equipment, adding aluminum lithographic plates and steel racks to the derivative tariff coverage, and lowering the threshold for products to qualify as made 'entirely' from American metals from 95% to 85%.
Removing Unnecessary and Counterproductive Restrictions on Access to Federal Lands
This executive order rescinds two 1970s-era executive orders (11644 and 11989) that required federal agencies to use vague environmental and social criteria when designating off-road vehicle use on federal lands. It directs the Secretaries of War, Interior, Agriculture, the TVA Board, and other relevant agency heads to initiate rulemakings to remove or revise regulations based on those criteria, aiming to increase access for energy, timber, utility maintenance, and recreation.