SolicitationPosted Feb 23, 2026·Original deadline passed (Feb 25). See latest amendment for current deadline.

56--NV-STILLWATER NWRC-HUNTER RD GRAVEL PROJ

Interior (all) · FWS, OVER SAT G/S

Stage
Open solicitation
NAICS
212319
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
140F0S26Q0004
Set-aside
Small Business Set Aside - Total
PSC
5610
Place
Not stated
Contact
Sung, Robert (robert_sung@fws.gov)
Loading your pipeline and notes…
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation 140F0S26Q0004 in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
  • Dec 16, 2025
    Sources Sought
    Open
Solicitation
  • Feb 13, 2026
    Solicitation
    Open
  • Feb 17, 2026
    Solicitation
    Open
  • Feb 23, 2026 · this notice
    Solicitation
Award
  • Mar 2, 2026
    Award Notice
    GIVING TREE CAPITAL, LLC · $560K
    Open

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Decide bid or no bid before the response deadline.
  • Look at the past winners for likely competitors and teaming partners.
  • Follow the opportunity to hear about amendments and the award.

What the notice says

NV-STILLWATER NWRC-HUNTER RD GRAVEL PROJ Type 2 Class B base course with Tailgate spread for Fallon NV. See SOW in solicitation packet for specifications. Provide a statement that you understand the standard for Type 2 Class B base course as defined in the SOW and include your CAGE code in your submission. **AMENDMENT 2, Update** The Government has $560,042.96. The vendor is requested to update their quotes to provide the quantity of stone that can be provided for this amount. ********** Email Robert_Sung@fws.gov for questions and your quotes. RFI Q&A response Q1: After reviewing this requirem… (show all)

ent with our subcontractor, we received the following clarification from them: "If the trucks ran consecutively, they could all dump in sequence, allowing the refuge staff time to work the material before the trucks returned for their second and third trips. The total daily tonnage can be adjusted to suit your needs by increasing or decreasing the number of trucks. We anticipate approximately 800-1,000 tons per shift. The material would be delivered using belly dump trains, leaving a window for the refuge staff to spread. We would revise the proposal to include minimum truck spacing. However, doing so would limit roughly half the trucks to only two loads per day, increasing the cost per ton. Based on this scenario and eight trucks per day, spacing would be approximately 15-30 minutes between loads, followed by about 1.25 hours of downtime between the last truck in the first rotation and the first truck returning for the second rotation. This would result in approximately 800 tons per shift." Based on this, strict adherence to the minimum 15-minute spacing requirement would materially affect operational efficiency and increase the cost per ton. We would respectfully like to inquire whether there is any flexibility in the delivery spacing requirement. Specifically: A. Would consecutive dumping be acceptable if coordinated safely and efficiently with the grading contractor? B. Is the 15-minute minimum interval mandatory throughout the entire shift, or could it be adjusted during certain delivery windows? C. Would alternative staging or sequencing methods be considered, provided safety and site control are maintained? A1: The refuge does have some flexibility on the spacing of the trucks and could be coordinated at that time with the project coordinator. During the work day - we will have a refuge staff member who is stationed to take the tickets from drivers and direct them when it is safe to unload. However, we have completed similar projects at least three times in the past 5 years with various contractors. A 15-minute interval between trucks was generally what they averaged between trucks just based on how long it took the for each load to be filled between the first and the next truck at the gravel pit. Across the projects, delivery has averaged between 800-1k tons per day. For the specific questions: A. Yes, consecutive dumping can be coordinated with the refuge staff who will be completing the gravel grading. B. The 15 minute interval would not be mandatory and could vary throughout the shift, but would need to be coordinated with staff on site. C. Alternative staging or sequencing methods could be considered, provided safety and site control are maintained. The contractor would be responsible for coordinating with the project manager on site and ultimately would be responsible for ensuring the gravel is delivered to its final location on the delivery route.

Who won similar work

9 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same office (FWS, OVER SAT G/S), same product/service code (PSC) 5610 and NAICS 212319.

Single-winner award sizes (9): middle half $343K to $970K, median $500K; range $214K to $1.0M.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
ROGERS BROTHERS LAND CLEARING LLC3$1.1MAug 28, 2026
GIVING TREE CAPITAL, LLC2$2.1MSep 25, 2025
GovLink LLC1$970KJul 13, 2026
KERNEN CONSTRUCTION 2350 GLENDALE DR McKinleyville CA 95519 USA1$585KAug 7, 2026
ECOLOGY MIR GROUP LLC1$343KAug 22, 2025
CROWLEY HOLDINGS LLC1$214KJun 13, 2025

Value counts new single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling (same contract, or the same office, day and amount); that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Contract modifications are not new awards and are not added in either. Notices whose amount is a placeholder such as $999,999,999 are not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings.

Latest awards

Competitive landscape

For the 6 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 0 of these past winners lobbied Interior, Dept of (DOI) since 2024 (0 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Interior, Dept of (DOI) job
  • No corporate PAC money from them to the overseeing committees since 2024
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 150 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.

  • 0 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name, including the subsidiaries a company lists in its SEC filings. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.