To increase the supply of, and lower rents for, affordable housing and to assess calculations of area median income for purposes of Federal low-income housing assistance, and for other purposes.

On May 22, 2026, Representative Yvette Clarke (D-NY-9) introduced HR9014, a bill titled 'To increase the supply of, and lower rents for, affordable housing and to assess calculations of area median income for purposes of Federal low-income housing assistance, and for other purposes.' The bill was referred to the House Committee on Financial Services, the first step in the legislative process. It has 14 cosponsors, all Democrats, and no companion bill in the Senate. The bill is in an early stage with no committee markup or hearings scheduled.

The bill does not authorize or appropriate any specific funding amount. It directs HUD to study and potentially revise the methodology for calculating area median income (AMI), which is used to determine eligibility for federal housing assistance programs such as Section 8 vouchers and Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC). A change in AMI calculations could expand or contract the pool of households eligible for subsidies, which would indirectly affect demand for affordable housing development and the associated financing. However, the bill does not mandate any specific change, only a study and potential revision, so the near-term financial impact is negligible.

The structural winners from a potential AMI recalculation would be multifamily lenders and developers focused on affordable housing. The largest multifamily lenders among publicly traded banks are JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America ($BAC), Wells Fargo ($WFC), and Citigroup ($C). These banks originate construction and permanent loans for affordable housing projects, often in partnership with LIHTC syndicators. However, the impact on their total revenue is minimal — for example, JPM's $158.1B revenue dwarfs any potential change in affordable housing loan volume. The bill does not directly benefit any specific company or sector.

No real market data is provided for stock prices. The competitive landscape for multifamily lending is dominated by large banks and government-sponsored enterprises (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac), which are not publicly traded. The bill's impact on the finance sector is structural but distant and uncertain.

The legislative timeline is long and uncertain. The bill must pass the House Financial Services Committee, then the full House, then the Senate, and be signed by the President. With a Democratic sponsor in a Republican-controlled House (119th Congress, 2025-2027), the bill faces significant headwinds. No hearings or markups have been scheduled. The earliest possible action would be late 2026, but the bill is more likely to stall in committee.