To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to limit the application of the Endangered Species Act with respect to certain actions under the national flood insurance program, and for other purposes.

HR7862, the "National Flood Insurance Program Clarification Act of 2026," eliminates the application of Section 7(a) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to several key NFIP actions, including flood insurance rate map updates, flood plain management criteria, and certain flood mitigation activities. This directly removes a significant regulatory hurdle for construction and infrastructure projects in flood-prone regions. Furthermore, it mandates the withdrawal of existing biological opinions related to NFIP under the ESA, preventing future reissuance. This action immediately reduces project timelines and costs for developers and property owners seeking to build or rebuild in these areas. The money trail for this bill is primarily through reduced regulatory compliance costs and accelerated project timelines. Property developers will experience lower carrying costs for land and faster revenue recognition from completed projects. Insurers will benefit from a clearer regulatory landscape, potentially expanding the pool of insurable properties and reducing uncertainty in underwriting. There are no direct appropriations or grants associated with this bill; the financial impact is entirely through regulatory relief and efficiency gains. The bill's sponsor, Rep. Bentz, Cliff [R-OR-2], is a Republican, indicating a focus on deregulation and economic development. Historically, similar efforts to streamline environmental reviews for infrastructure and development projects have led to increased activity in the affected sectors. For example, the FAST Act of 2015 included provisions to accelerate environmental reviews for transportation projects. Following its passage, major infrastructure and construction companies saw increased project pipelines. While not directly comparable in scope, the principle of regulatory relief leading to increased development holds. The removal of ESA reviews specifically for NFIP actions is a targeted deregulation that will immediately impact development in flood zones. Specific winners include major homebuilders operating in coastal and flood-prone regions, such as Lennar Corporation ($LEN), D.R. Horton ($DHI), KB Home ($KBH), Toll Brothers ($TOL), and M/I Homes ($MHO). These companies will face fewer delays and lower costs for new developments or redevelopments. Property and casualty insurers, particularly those with significant exposure to flood insurance, also benefit. This includes Berkshire Hathaway ($BRK-A), which owns GEICO and other insurance entities, Allstate Corporation ($ALL), The Travelers Companies ($TRV), and CNA Financial Corporation ($CNA). These insurers will see reduced regulatory risk and potentially expanded market opportunities. There are no clear losers from this bill, as it primarily removes a regulatory burden. This bill has been introduced in the House and referred to the Committee on Financial Services. The next step is committee consideration, followed by a potential vote in the House and then the Senate. Given the direct regulatory relief, the bill is likely to move forward, especially with a sponsor focused on economic development. The impact will be felt immediately upon enactment, as developers and insurers will no longer be subject to the ESA review requirements for the specified NFIP actions.