To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide special rules with respect to the net operating losses of certain financial institutions.
Summary
HR9383, a bill to provide special NOL rules for financial institutions, was introduced on June 22, 2026, and referred to the House Ways and Means Committee. At the early referral stage, the bill has no direct market impact; potential benefits for large banks depend on legislative progression and each bank's NOL position.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.HR9383 is a minor, early-stage tax bill with limited near-term market impact.
- 2.Only banks with significant past NOLs (e.g., Citigroup) could see modest benefit; profitable banks see negligible effect.
- 3.Legislative odds are low; investors should not overweight this bill in portfolio decisions.
Market Implications
This bill has negligible implications for the equity prices of major banks. Market participants will pay little attention until committee action. If the bill gains traction, banks with NOL positions such as Citigroup could see a small positive catalyst. However, for the mega-cap banks represented in the data, the impact is too small to move share prices. Investors should focus on broader macro factors driving bank stocks (interest rates, loan growth, credit quality) rather than this niche tax provision.
Full Analysis
-
On June 22, 2026, Rep. Mike Carey (R-OH-15) introduced HR9383, which would amend the Internal Revenue Code to provide special net operating loss (NOL) rules for certain financial institutions. The bill has 9 cosponsors and was referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means, marking the earliest legislative stage. No further action or markup has occurred.
-
This is a tax authorization bill that would change how financial institutions compute and apply NOLs, likely allowing carrybacks to prior tax years for refunds. As an authorization, it sets policy but does not directly appropriate funds; any fiscal impact would result from reduced tax revenue, estimated to be minimal given current bank profitability. Actual budget effects would be scored by the JCT if the bill advances.
-
The bill directly affects the finance sector, specifically large commercial banks and investment banks that may have incurred NOLs from past credit losses or restructuring. Based on FY2025 data, most major banks are highly profitable: JPM ($49.6B net income), BAC ($26.3B), WFC ($19.1B), C ($9.2B), GS ($8.5B), MS ($9.1B). Only Citi and possibly Goldman have significant historical losses that could generate NOLs. The bill's benefit is limited to banks with NOL positions; for most, the impact is negligible. Pure-play banks with recent losses (e.g., regional banks like $KEY, $HBAN, not listed in data) could benefit more, but given the data provided, we focus on the megabanks.
-
No real market data is provided for stock prices. Structurally, if the bill passes, banks with NOLs could see a one-time cash flow boost, improving capital ratios modestly. However, the legislative path is uncertain: the bill must clear Ways and Means, pass the House, then Senate, and be signed. Given the Republican sponsor and early stage, passage odds are low in the current session without broader tax reform.
-
Timeline: The bill is in committee; the next step is a markup or hearing, which could occur in late 2026 or early 2027. With the 119th Congress ending January 2027, this bill has limited time to advance. Retail investors should monitor for any committee action but not trade on this speculative legislation.
Key Legislators
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
Presidential Memorandum: Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Development, Manufacturing, and Deployment of Large-Scale Energy and Energy‑Related Infrastructure
Executive Order: Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks
Community Bank Regulatory Tailoring Act
Executive Order: Securing the Nation Against Advanced Cryptographic Attacks
Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025
Executive Order: Imposing Sanctions on Those Responsible for Repression in Cuba and for Threats to United States National Security and Foreign Policy
Executive Order: Promoting Retirement-Savings Access for American Workers by Establishing TrumpIRA.gov
Executive Order: Restoring Integrity to America’s Financial System
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
Securing the Nation Against Advanced Cryptographic Attacks
This executive order mandates a nationwide transition of federal information systems and critical infrastructure to post-quantum cryptography (PQC) by specific deadlines (2030 for key establishment, 2031 for digital signatures), directs NIST to lead technical guidance and a pilot project, requires agencies to appoint PQC migration leads, and orders the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council to propose rules requiring contractors to comply with NIST PQC standards by 2030.
National Homeownership Month, 2026
This proclamation formalizes National Homeownership Month and details several ongoing or proposed policy actions: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are directed to purchase $200 billion in mortgage-backed securities to lower borrowing costs; an executive order bans large institutional investors from buying single-family homes; and the Administration calls on Congress to pass the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act to make these reforms permanent. The action also reaffirms efforts to restrict taxpayer-backed loans to only law-abiding citizens, targeting fraud and illegal immigration as a means to improve housing affordability.
Implementing Schedule Policy/Career in the Excepted Service
This executive order expands the Schedule Policy/Career excepted service category, transferring certain federal positions from competitive service to at-will employment to facilitate removal for poor performance or misconduct. It directs agency heads to petition for reclassification of policy-influencing roles, mandates performance bonus pools for these employees, and amends civil service rules to exempt them from standard adverse action procedures.
Free — no credit card
Get the next market-moving signal before the news does
HillSignal scores every Congressional bill, federal contract, and insider filing for market impact and emails you the high-conviction ones — free, no credit card.
Weekly digest — the congressional activity that actually moved markets that week, in plain English. Free, one email.
Free forever plan · No credit card · Unsubscribe in one click
Want the live terminal too? Create a free account →