billHR9331Event Thursday, June 18, 2026Analyzed

To amend the Expedited Funds Availability Act to provide exceptions in the case of fraudulent checks or wire transfers, and for other purposes.

Neutral

Summary

HR9331 is an early-stage bill referred to committee with no market impact. It proposes amendments to check fraud rules but has no funding, no binding effect, and no near-term legislative path.

See which stocks are affected

Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.

Already have an account? Log in

Key Takeaways

  • 1.No market impact at this stage
  • 2.No funding or spending authorized
  • 3.Procedural only — no binding effect

Market Implications

No market implications. This is a routine procedural referral with no funding, no mandate, and no direct effect on any publicly traded company's revenue.

Full Analysis

  1. What happened: On 2026-06-18, Rep. Young Kim (R-CA-40) introduced HR9331 in the 119th Congress, titled 'To amend the Expedited Funds Availability Act to provide exceptions in the case of fraudulent checks or wire transfers, and for other purposes.' The bill was referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. It is in the earliest legislative stage — introduced and referred to committee. 2) The money trail: This bill does not authorize or appropriate any funding. It proposes a change to the Expedited Funds Availability Act (EFAA), which governs how quickly banks must make deposited funds available. The bill would create exceptions for fraudulent checks or wire transfers, potentially allowing banks to delay availability when fraud is detected. There is no direct government spending or contract mechanism. 3) Structural winners and losers: No specific companies are directly named or affected by this bill. The EFAA applies broadly to all depository institutions. If enacted, it would affect all banks' check and wire processing procedures. However, at this early stage with no committee action, no hearings, and no companion bill, the probability of passage is extremely low. 4) No real market data is provided for this bill. 5) Timeline: The bill must pass the House Financial Services Committee, then the full House, then the Senate, and be signed by the President. No further actions have occurred since introduction.

Key Legislators

Rep. Kim, Young [R-CA-40]

Related Presidential Actions

Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies

proclamationJun 12, 2026

National Homeownership Month, 2026

This proclamation formalizes National Homeownership Month and details several ongoing or proposed policy actions: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are directed to purchase $200 billion in mortgage-backed securities to lower borrowing costs; an executive order bans large institutional investors from buying single-family homes; and the Administration calls on Congress to pass the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act to make these reforms permanent. The action also reaffirms efforts to restrict taxpayer-backed loans to only law-abiding citizens, targeting fraud and illegal immigration as a means to improve housing affordability.

Exec OrderJun 3, 2026

Implementing Schedule Policy/Career in the Excepted Service

This executive order expands the Schedule Policy/Career excepted service category, transferring certain federal positions from competitive service to at-will employment to facilitate removal for poor performance or misconduct. It directs agency heads to petition for reclassification of policy-influencing roles, mandates performance bonus pools for these employees, and amends civil service rules to exempt them from standard adverse action procedures.

Exec OrderMay 19, 2026

Restoring Integrity to America’s Financial System

This executive order directs the Treasury Department to issue an advisory to financial institutions on risks from non-work authorized populations and their employers, propose regulatory changes to strengthen Bank Secrecy Act customer due diligence and identification requirements, and consider risks from foreign consular IDs. It also directs the CFPB to clarify that deportation risk can affect ability-to-repay assessments for non-work authorized borrowers, and federal financial regulators to issue guidance on credit risks from this population.