Data Care Act of 2025
Summary
The Data Care Act of 2025 (S.3570) is an early-stage Senate bill that would impose duties of care, confidentiality, and loyalty on online service providers regarding consumer data. The bill is in committee with zero funding authorization and faces a long legislative path, making near-term market impact minimal. However, structurally it threatens the business models of ad-reliant platforms by restricting behavioral data usage.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.The Data Care Act is in very early legislative stages with zero committee action since introduction; near-zero probability of enactment in the 119th Congress.
- 2.If enacted, the bill would structurally threaten behavioral advertising business models at META, GOOGL, and SNAP by restricting data collection and usage.
- 3.No funding is authorized — this is a regulatory mandate on private companies, not a government spending bill.
Market Implications
No current market implications due to the bill's early stage and low enactment probability. Investors should monitor for committee hearings or markups as potential catalysts. If the bill gains momentum, expect bearish pressure on pure-play digital advertising stocks ($SNAP, ) relative to diversified tech (, $AMZN). Data broker and ad-tech companies would also face direct headwinds.
Full Analysis
Intelligence Surface
Cross-referenced against federal contracts, SEC insider filings & congressional trade disclosures
No confirming evidence found yet from contracts, insider trades, or congressional activity
What the bill does
Duty of loyalty and confidentiality imposed on online service providers regarding collection, use, and sharing of individual identifying data and sensitive data.
Who must act
Online service providers that collect individual identifying data in interstate commerce, including Snap Inc.
What happens
Snap's advertising business, which is almost entirely based on behavioral targeting of user data, would face compliance costs and restrictions on data usage that directly impair its ad-targeting capabilities.
Stock impact
Snap generates essentially all revenue from advertising. Unlike META or GOOGL, it has minimal revenue diversification. The company is also smaller and has less resources to navigate compliance. A duty-of-care requirement could force a fundamental pivot away from behavioral targeting, severely impacting revenue per user and potentially the viability of the current business model.
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
SCAM Act
PROTECT Act
Parents Over Platforms Act
No Fentanyl on Social Media Act
SMK Act of 2025
Stop the Scroll Act
Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act
Protecting Consumers from Deceptive AI Act
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
To Implement Certain Provisions in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026, and for Other Purposes
This proclamation implements provisions of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026, extending duty-free treatment under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) through December 31, 2026, including the regional apparel article program and third-country fabric program. It also redesignates Gabon as a beneficiary sub-Saharan African country effective January 1, 2026, and extends preferential tariff treatment for Haiti under the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act (CBERA) through December 31, 2026, with updated percentage limits for apparel imports. The proclamation directs modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) and authorizes agencies to implement these changes.
Restoring Integrity to America’s Financial System
This executive order directs the Treasury Department to issue an advisory to financial institutions on risks from non-work authorized populations and their employers, propose regulatory changes to strengthen Bank Secrecy Act customer due diligence and identification requirements, and consider risks from foreign consular IDs. It also directs the CFPB to clarify that deportation risk can affect ability-to-repay assessments for non-work authorized borrowers, and federal financial regulators to issue guidance on credit risks from this population.
Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks
This executive order directs federal financial regulators to review and streamline regulations that hinder fintech innovation, particularly for small and emerging firms, and requests the Federal Reserve to evaluate expanding access to its payment accounts and services for non-bank and digital asset firms. It aims to reduce barriers to entry and encourage partnerships between fintech firms and traditional financial institutions, with specific deadlines for reviews and reports.