PREDICT Act
Summary
The PREDICT Act (HR8076) is an early-stage bill that would prohibit covered individuals—including Members of Congress, senior executive branch officials, and judicial officers—from trading on prediction markets. It has been referred to three committees and has 25 cosponsors, but no further action since introduction on 2026-03-25. The bill authorizes no funding and imposes no direct financial impact on publicly traded companies.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.HR8076 is an early-stage bill with no funding and no direct corporate impact.
- 2.No publicly traded companies are affected by this legislation.
- 3.The bill has stalled since introduction, with no committee action in over two months.
Market Implications
No market implications. The PREDICT Act does not authorize spending, create contracts, or regulate any publicly traded company. Prediction market platforms are private. Investors should not allocate capital based on this bill.
Full Analysis
-
On March 25, 2026, Rep. Budzinski (D-IL) introduced HR8076, the PREDICT Act, which would amend federal ethics law to ban trading on prediction markets by Members of Congress, their families, senior executive branch officials (including the President and Vice President), political appointees, and judicial officers. The bill was referred to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, House Administration, and Judiciary. As of June 3, 2026, no further legislative action has occurred—no hearings, markups, or votes. The bill remains in early-stage committee referral.
-
The bill authorizes zero funding. It is a prohibitory statute, not a spending authorization or appropriation. It imposes a legal restriction on individuals, not a financial flow to companies or sectors. There is no money trail for investors to follow.
-
The bill does not directly affect any publicly traded company. Prediction market platforms (e.g., Kalshi, Polymarket) are not publicly traded in the US. The restriction targets individual traders, not the platforms themselves. Even if the bill advanced, its impact on corporate earnings would be negligible—prediction market volumes are small relative to traditional financial markets, and the banned individuals represent a tiny fraction of users.
-
No real market data is provided. The competitive landscape for prediction markets is dominated by private companies (Kalshi, Polymarket, PredictIt). No public equities are materially exposed.
-
The legislative path is long and uncertain. The bill must pass through three committees, then the House floor, then the Senate, and be signed by the President. With only 25 cosponsors and no Republican sponsors (the lead sponsor is a Democrat, with two Democratic cosponsors listed), bipartisan support is unclear. The 119th Congress is in its second session, and the bill has not moved in over two months. Passage in this Congress is unlikely.
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
Presidential Memorandum: Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Development, Manufacturing, and Deployment of Large-Scale Energy and Energy‑Related Infrastructure
Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025
Executive Order: Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks
Community Bank Regulatory Tailoring Act
Ensuring Better Interest Treatment and Deductibility Act (EBITDA)
Executive Order: Imposing Sanctions on Those Responsible for Repression in Cuba and for Threats to United States National Security and Foreign Policy
Executive Order: Promoting Retirement-Savings Access for American Workers by Establishing TrumpIRA.gov
Executive Order: Restoring Integrity to America’s Financial System
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
Restoring Integrity to America’s Financial System
This executive order directs the Treasury Department to issue an advisory to financial institutions on risks from non-work authorized populations and their employers, propose regulatory changes to strengthen Bank Secrecy Act customer due diligence and identification requirements, and consider risks from foreign consular IDs. It also directs the CFPB to clarify that deportation risk can affect ability-to-repay assessments for non-work authorized borrowers, and federal financial regulators to issue guidance on credit risks from this population.
Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks
This executive order directs federal financial regulators to review and streamline regulations that hinder fintech innovation, particularly for small and emerging firms, and requests the Federal Reserve to evaluate expanding access to its payment accounts and services for non-bank and digital asset firms. It aims to reduce barriers to entry and encourage partnerships between fintech firms and traditional financial institutions, with specific deadlines for reviews and reports.
Imposing Sanctions on Those Responsible for Repression in Cuba and for Threats to United States National Security and Foreign Policy
This Executive Order expands the existing national emergency against the Government of Cuba by imposing broad secondary sanctions and asset freezes on foreign persons operating in key sectors of the Cuban economy (energy, defense, metals/mining, financial services, security). It authorizes the Treasury and State Departments to block property and deny entry to individuals and entities involved in repression, corruption, or support for the Cuban government, and empowers Treasury to sanction foreign financial institutions that facilitate transactions for designated persons. The order effectively tightens the U.S. embargo by targeting third-country companies and banks that do business with Cuba.