MTS CYBER Act of 2026
Summary
HR 7625 (MTS CYBER Act) is an early-stage bill that orders a GAO review of Coast Guard cybersecurity resources. It authorizes zero funding and has no direct market impact. The bill is purely informational and has not moved past committee referral.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.HR 7625 authorizes zero funding – it is a study mandate, not a spending bill.
- 2.No direct impact on cybersecurity vendors or maritime operators in the near term.
- 3.The bill is in early stage with a long legislative path; passage probability is low.
Market Implications
No immediate market implications. The bill is too early-stage and too procedural to move any sector. Cybersecurity stocks ($CRWD, $PANW) are not affected. Maritime transportation stocks ($CSX, $UNP, $DAL) are not affected. Monitor for future appropriations bills that could fund Coast Guard cybersecurity procurement.
Full Analysis
-
What happened: On February 20, 2026, Rep. McDowell (R-NC) introduced HR 7625, the MTS CYBER Act. The bill was referred to two committees (Transportation & Infrastructure; Homeland Security) and then to subcommittees. As of June 3, 2026, it remains in early stage – no hearings, no markup, no floor vote. The bill text directs the Comptroller General (GAO) to review the Coast Guard's budget, resources, and capabilities as co-Sector Risk Management Agency for the marine transportation system. It does not authorize or appropriate any funding.
-
Money trail: Zero. The bill is a study mandate. It does not create a grant program, tax credit, or procurement authorization. Any future cybersecurity spending for the Coast Guard would require a separate appropriations bill. The bill's findings note that $20B was allocated for port infrastructure under the Investing in America Agenda but that cybersecurity-specific allocations were unspecified – this bill does not change that.
-
Structural winners/losers: No direct winners or losers. The bill is procedural. If it leads to future appropriations for Coast Guard cybersecurity, endpoint security vendors like CrowdStrike ($CRWD) and network security vendors like Palo Alto Networks ($PANW) could eventually benefit. However, that is a multi-step inference with low confidence. The bill does not mandate any private-sector compliance changes, so maritime operators (e.g., $CSX, $UNP, $DAL) are unaffected.
-
Real market data: No real market data was provided for price trends. Based on structural positioning, cybersecurity stocks have no near-term catalyst from this bill.
-
Timeline: The bill must pass both House committees, then the full House, then the Senate, then be signed. Given its early stage and lack of urgency, passage in the 119th Congress is uncertain. Even if passed, the GAO study would take 6-12 months, with any resulting procurement years away.
Intelligence Surface
Cross-referenced against federal contracts, SEC insider filings & congressional trade disclosures
No confirming evidence found yet from contracts, insider trades, or congressional activity
What the bill does
GAO review of Coast Guard cybersecurity budget and resources; no direct mandate or funding for private sector.
Who must act
Coast Guard (DHS) – must provide budget/resource data to GAO.
What happens
No immediate change in cybersecurity spending or regulatory requirements for maritime operators.
Stock impact
CrowdStrike's Falcon platform is used by federal agencies; a future Coast Guard procurement could increase revenue, but this bill only authorizes a study – no procurement trigger.
What the bill does
GAO review of Coast Guard cybersecurity budget and resources; no direct mandate or funding for private sector.
Who must act
Coast Guard (DHS) – must provide budget/resource data to GAO.
What happens
No immediate change in cybersecurity spending or regulatory requirements for maritime operators.
Stock impact
Palo Alto Networks' Prisma and firewalls are used by federal agencies; a future Coast Guard procurement could increase revenue, but this bill only authorizes a study – no procurement trigger.
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
Energy Threat Analysis Center Act of 2026
Pipeline Cybersecurity Preparedness Act
Health Care Cybersecurity and Resiliency Act of 2026
STEADFAST Act
Foreign Robocall Elimination Act
Small Business Cybersecurity Assistance Evaluation Act of 2026
Government Surveillance Reform Act of 2026
Block the Use of Transatlantic Technology in Iranian Made Drones Act
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
Strengthening Customs Enforcement
This executive order directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to revise customs enforcement regulations within 180 days, requiring importers of record (IORs) to maintain minimum tangible domestic assets or bonding, disclose ownership and business affiliations, and maintain good standing with CBP. It prohibits foreign IORs from filing informal entries for low-value articles and imposes additional bonding and CTPAT validation requirements for foreign IORs on formal entries, aiming to enhance compliance and revenue collection.
Presidential Permit: Authorizing Bridger Pipeline Expansion LLC to Construct, Connect, Operate, and Maintain Pipeline Facilities at the International Boundary at Phillips County, Montana, Between the United States and Canada
This Presidential Memorandum grants a permit to Bridger Pipeline Expansion LLC to construct and operate a new 36-inch diameter crude oil and petroleum products pipeline crossing the U.S.-Canada border in Montana. The permit authorizes bidirectional flow and variable throughput capacity without requiring further presidential approval, while maintaining existing regulatory oversight from agencies like PHMSA and reserving the government's right to seize the facilities for national security with compensation.
Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Coal Supply Chains and Baseload Power Generation Capacity
This presidential memorandum invokes Section 303 of the Defense Production Act (DPA) to bolster coal supply chains and baseload power generation capacity, declaring them essential for national defense. It authorizes the Secretary of Energy to make purchases, commitments, and provide financial support to expand these capabilities, waiving certain DPA requirements for expediency.