billHR3716Event Tuesday, December 2, 2025Analyzed

Systemic Risk Authority Transparency Act

Neutral
Impact4/10

Summary

HR3716, the Systemic Risk Authority Transparency Act, has been referred to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. This bill mandates increased reporting and review by banking regulators and the GAO following a systemic risk determination related to a failed insured depository institution. It does not authorize or appropriate new funding but increases oversight for the financial sector.

See which stocks are affected

Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.

Already have an account? Log in

Key Takeaways

  • 1.HR3716 mandates increased transparency and reporting from banking regulators and the GAO after a systemic risk determination related to a failed bank.
  • 2.The bill does not authorize or appropriate any funding; its impact is regulatory and oversight-focused.
  • 3.Major financial institutions ($JPM, $BAC, $WFC, $C, $GS, $MS) could face increased scrutiny and potential compliance adjustments if the bill becomes law.

Market Implications

The Systemic Risk Authority Transparency Act, if enacted, would primarily affect the Finance sector by increasing post-failure oversight and reporting requirements for banking regulators and the GAO. This could lead to more stringent regulatory expectations for large financial institutions like JPMorgan Chase ($JPM), Bank of America ($BAC), Wells Fargo ($WFC), Citigroup ($C), Goldman Sachs ($GS), and Morgan Stanley ($MS). While the bill does not directly impact their balance sheets or revenue streams, the enhanced transparency could influence risk management practices and potentially lead to higher compliance costs in the long term. There are no direct market implications for other sectors.

Full Analysis

HR3716, the Systemic Risk Authority Transparency Act, was introduced in the House on June 4, 2025, and passed the House on December 1, 2025. It was subsequently received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on December 2, 2025. The bill's current status is 'Referred to committee — early stage' in the Senate, indicating it has several legislative steps remaining before potential passage into law. This bill does not authorize or appropriate any specific funding amounts. Instead, it amends the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to require detailed reports from the Comptroller General of the United States (GAO) and appropriate federal banking agencies following a systemic risk determination related to a failed insured depository institution. These reports would cover the basis for the determination, actions taken, likely effects on incentives and conduct of institutions and depositors, mismanagement by executives and the board, compensation practices, supervisory shortcomings, and contributions from other entities like auditors, credit rating agencies, and emergency liquidity providers. The mechanism is increased regulatory oversight and transparency, not direct financial allocation. Structural winners are not directly created by this bill, as it focuses on post-failure analysis rather than preventative measures or direct financial support. However, increased scrutiny on bank failures could lead to more stringent regulatory environments for large financial institutions. This could indirectly affect major banks such as JPMorgan Chase ($JPM), Bank of America ($BAC), Wells Fargo ($WFC), Citigroup ($C), Goldman Sachs ($GS), and Morgan Stanley ($MS) by potentially increasing compliance costs or influencing their risk management strategies. The bill aims to identify shortcomings in financial oversight and institutional management, which could lead to future policy changes impacting the finance sector broadly. The Presidential Memorandum on large-scale energy and infrastructure development is not directly relevant to this bill, as HR3716 focuses on financial sector transparency and oversight, not infrastructure funding or energy policy. Given its early stage in the Senate committee, the bill's ultimate passage is uncertain. The referral to the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee is a standard procedural step. The bill's sponsor, Rep. Al Green, is a Democrat from Texas, and the bill passed the House with a vote of 51-0 in committee, suggesting bipartisan support in the House. However, Senate consideration can be a lengthy process, and the bill will need to be reported out of committee, pass a full Senate vote, and then be signed by the President to become law.

Market Impact Score

4/10
Minimal ImpactModerateMajor Market Event

Related Presidential Actions

Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies

presidential_memorandumApr 20, 2026

Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Development, Manufacturing, and Deployment of Large-Scale Energy and Energy‑Related Infrastructure

This presidential memorandum invokes Section 303 of the Defense Production Act (DPA) to accelerate the development, manufacturing, and deployment of large-scale energy and energy-related infrastructure. It authorizes the Secretary of Energy to make necessary purchases, commitments, and financial instruments to expand domestic capabilities in this sector, citing a national energy emergency and the need to avert an industrial resource shortfall.