Financial Reporting Threshold Modernization Act
Summary
HR1799, the Financial Reporting Threshold Modernization Act, raises CTR and SAR filing thresholds for the first time in decades, reducing compliance costs for banks. The bill is on the House Union Calendar after committee approval. No market-moving effect is expected — this is incremental regulatory relief, not a revenue-driven catalyst.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.HR1799 raises CTR threshold from $10,000 to $30,000 — first meaningful update since the original Bank Secrecy Act thresholds were set.
- 2.No federal funding authorized — impact is purely regulatory cost reduction for financial institutions.
- 3.Bill is active (Union Calendar) but has not passed the House; Senate companion bill has not been introduced.
- 4.Largest beneficiaries: large retail banks with high cash transaction volumes (JPM, BAC, WFC).
Market Implications
This is a modest, incremental regulatory relief bill. It does not create new revenue streams or change interest margins. The market impact is neutral to slightly positive for bank stocks in the sector, but the effect is small relative to other drivers (net interest margin, credit cycles, regulation from the CFPB, Basel III endgame rules). Expect no material stock price reactions upon passage. The structural benefit is real — compliance cost savings compound annually — but the magnitude is unlikely to move earnings per share by more than low single digits for any covered bank.
Full Analysis
-
What happened and its current status (use correct tense): On March 19, 2026, the House Committee on Financial Services reported HR1799 (amended) and placed it on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 478). The bill was introduced on March 3, 2025 by Rep. Loudermilk (R-GA) and has 20 cosponsors. It is now eligible for floor consideration in the House but has not yet received a floor vote. The 119th Congress (2025-2027) remains in session, and the bill has active momentum — it moved from introduction to committee mark-up to reported status in roughly 12 months.
-
The money trail — distinguish authorization from appropriation: HR1799 authorizes no direct spending. It imposes no new appropriations. It modifies regulatory parameters under existing law (31 U.S.C. 5313, 5318(g), 5331). The financial impact is entirely a reduction in private-sector compliance costs — banks will spend less on filing CTRs (from $10K to $30K threshold) and SARs (from $5K to $10K). FinCEN itself does not receive new funding; its current appropriations continue unchanged.
-
Structural winners and losers: The primary winners are large US retail banks with extensive branch networks that generate high volumes of currency transactions. $JPM, $BAC, and $WFC benefit most directly from the 3x CTR threshold increase. Regional banks like $USB, $PNC, and $TFC also benefit proportionally but with lower absolute savings. Money services businesses (MSBs) — such as $WU, $MGI (MoneyGram, now private), and smaller payment firms — benefit from the MSB registration threshold increase ($1K to $3K). The primary structural loser is the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), which will receive fewer SARs and CTRs, reducing its surveillance data density — though this is a policy trade-off, not a financial harm.
-
Legislative velocity and remaining steps: The bill has had 8 actions over 12 months, including a committee mark-up (voted 30-24, mostly along party lines) and formal reporting with a committee report (H. Rept. 119-556). It is on the Union Calendar, meaning it is ready for House floor consideration under a suspension of the rules (requires 2/3 majority) or regular order. No Senate companion bill has been identified. If passed by the House, it would require Senate Banking Committee consideration and a floor vote. Given the partisan vote (30-24) in committee and the midterm election year (2026), passage before November is plausible but not guaranteed.
Intelligence Surface
Cross-referenced against federal contracts, SEC insider filings & congressional trade disclosures
Some confirming evidence found across public data sources
What the bill does
Regulatory threshold increase: the bill raises the mandatory CTR filing threshold from $10,000 to $30,000, the SAR filing threshold from $5,000 to $10,000, and the MSB registration threshold from $1,000 to $3,000, with automatic inflation adjustments every five years.
Who must act
All financial institutions subject to FinCEN reporting under 31 U.S.C. §5313 and §5318(g), including banks, credit unions, money services businesses, and broker-dealers.
What happens
Immediate reduction in the volume of CTRs and SARs required per dollar transacted; higher thresholds mean fewer reports filed for the same aggregate transaction volume, lowering compliance labor and system costs per dollar of deposits or transfers processed.
Stock impact
JPMorgan Chase operates the largest US retail deposit base (~$1.8T in deposits). Its AML/BSA compliance operations process millions of CTRs annually. A 3x increase in the CTR threshold reduces filing volume by roughly two-thirds for cash transactions under $30,000, directly cutting labor, software, and audit costs tied to those filings. JPM's scale magnifies the absolute cost savings.
What the bill does
Regulatory threshold increase: same statutory changes to CTR ($10K→$30K), SAR ($5K→$10K, $2K→$3K), and MSB definition thresholds as described above.
Who must act
Bank of America, as a universal bank with a large US consumer franchise, is subject to the same FinCEN rules.
What happens
Bank of America's retail banking segment processes a high volume of currency transactions through its ~4,000 branches. The threshold increase reduces the percentage of those transactions requiring automatic CTR filing, lowering compliance overhead per branch.
Stock impact
Bank of America's Global Wealth & Investment Management and Consumer Banking segments incur substantial BSA/AML compliance costs. Reduced CTR/SAR filing volume directly reduces personnel costs (compliance analysts, filing officers) and technology costs (transaction monitoring systems capacity). The magnitude scales with transaction volume; BofA processes roughly 5-8% of US cash transactions.
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
SSI Savings Penalty Elimination Act
Main Street Capital Access Act
Merchant Banking Modernization Act
Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act
To prohibit stock sales by senior bank executives in certain circumstances.
Main Street Depositor Protection Act
Improving SBA Engagement on Employee Ownership Act
More Homes on the Market Act
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
National Homeownership Month, 2026
This proclamation formalizes National Homeownership Month and details several ongoing or proposed policy actions: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are directed to purchase $200 billion in mortgage-backed securities to lower borrowing costs; an executive order bans large institutional investors from buying single-family homes; and the Administration calls on Congress to pass the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act to make these reforms permanent. The action also reaffirms efforts to restrict taxpayer-backed loans to only law-abiding citizens, targeting fraud and illegal immigration as a means to improve housing affordability.
Implementing Schedule Policy/Career in the Excepted Service
This executive order expands the Schedule Policy/Career excepted service category, transferring certain federal positions from competitive service to at-will employment to facilitate removal for poor performance or misconduct. It directs agency heads to petition for reclassification of policy-influencing roles, mandates performance bonus pools for these employees, and amends civil service rules to exempt them from standard adverse action procedures.
Restoring Integrity to America’s Financial System
This executive order directs the Treasury Department to issue an advisory to financial institutions on risks from non-work authorized populations and their employers, propose regulatory changes to strengthen Bank Secrecy Act customer due diligence and identification requirements, and consider risks from foreign consular IDs. It also directs the CFPB to clarify that deportation risk can affect ability-to-repay assessments for non-work authorized borrowers, and federal financial regulators to issue guidance on credit risks from this population.