To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a windfall profits excise tax on crude oil and to rebate the tax collected back to individual taxpayers, and for other purposes.
Summary
HR 7960 (Big Oil Windfall Profits Tax Act) is an early-stage bill referred to committee with low passage probability. It introduces headline risk to the energy sector but has no near-term financial impact. Real market data shows a broad 7-day rally across the sector (XOM +3.79%, CVX +4.1%, MPC +8.82%) despite a mixed 30-day trend, indicating that investors are not pricing in this legislative risk.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.HR 7960 is an early-stage House bill with low passage probability; no committee action has occurred in 6+ weeks.
- 2.Only 6 Democratic sponsors; no Republican support makes passage through divided Congress highly unlikely.
- 3.Actual market data shows a 7-day sector rally (XOM +3.79%, CVX +4.1%) indicating investors are not pricing in this risk.
- 4.If enacted, the tax would directly reduce margins for all US crude producers (XOM, CVX, EOG, OXY) and independent refiners (MPC, PSX, VLO).
Market Implications
Real market data from April 30, 2026 clearly shows a sector-wide 7-day rally despite the bill's existence. XOM closed at $154.56, CVX at $192.80, MPC at $243.92 — all well within their 52-week ranges and showing positive momentum over the trailing week. The 30-day picture is more mixed (MPC essentially flat, VLO +0.76%, but XOM, CVX, EOG, OXY down 6-9%), consistent with commodity price moves rather than legislative headwinds. Investors should note this bill is purely headline risk at this stage: no money has moved, no hearings have been held, and the party-line sponsorship signals a messaging bill rather than a legislative priority. Structural risk remains if oil prices rise sharply and political support grows, but the current data points to no market impact.
Full Analysis
HR 7960, the Big Oil Windfall Profits Tax Act, was introduced on March 17, 2026 by Rep. Khanna (D-CA) and referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. The bill remains in early-stage committee review with no scheduled hearings or markups as of April 30, 2026. A companion bill (S4111) exists in the Senate but also sits in committee. The bill's path to enactment requires passing through the Ways and Means Committee, House floor, Senate Finance Committee, Senate floor, and a presidential signature — none of which have occurred. With only 6 total sponsors (5 cosponsors) and no Republican support, passage in a divided Congress is highly unlikely. The bill imposes a 50% excise tax on crude oil extracted or entered in the US when the Brent crude price exceeds a 2025 annual average baseline, adjusted for inflation. No funding is authorized or appropriated — the mechanism is purely a tax and rebate structure. Real market data as of April 30, 2026 shows the entire oil sector in a strong 7-day rally: XOM $154.56 (+3.79%), CVX $192.80 (+4.10%), MPC $243.92 (+8.82%), PSX $175.53 (+7.79%), VLO $248.96 (+5.56%), EOG $139.52 (+4.80%), OXY $59.99 (+5.02%). The 30-day trends are mostly negative (XOM -8.9%, CVX -6.81%, OXY -7.71%), but the most recent week's surge suggests the bill's introduction over a month ago has not caused structural selling. The legislative timeline shows no near-term committee action likely; the next step would be a Ways and Means hearing or markup, which has no scheduled date.
Intelligence Surface
Cross-referenced against federal contracts, SEC insider filings & congressional trade disclosures
Some confirming evidence found across public data sources
What the bill does
50% excise tax on crude oil price above 2025 annual average Brent baseline, imposed on extraction and importation
Who must act
Covered taxpayers extracting taxable crude oil within the US or entering crude oil into the US for consumption, use, or warehousing
What happens
If Brent crude oil average price in a calendar quarter exceeds the 2025 annual average (plus inflation adjustment), the excess multiplied by 50% becomes a per-barrel tax liability
Stock impact
Marathon Petroleum is a large independent refiner that purchases and processes crude oil; it would be directly liable as an 'enterer' of crude oil into the US, increasing feedstock costs and compressing refining margins, though the bill's low probability limits near-term impact
What the bill does
50% excise tax on crude oil price above 2025 annual average Brent baseline, imposed on extraction and importation
Who must act
Covered taxpayers extracting taxable crude oil within the US or entering crude oil into the US for consumption, use, or warehousing
What happens
If Brent crude oil average price in a calendar quarter exceeds the 2025 annual average (plus inflation adjustment), the excess multiplied by 50% becomes a per-barrel tax liability
Stock impact
Phillips 66 is a major independent refiner that imports and processes crude oil; as an 'enterer' it would face additional per-barrel tax costs above the threshold, reducing downstream margins, though the bill is in early stages
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a windfall profits excise tax on crude oil and to rebate the tax collected back to individual taxpayers, and for other purposes.
New Source Review Permitting Improvement Act
To impose sanctions with respect to persons engaged in significant transactions related or incidental to the processing, refining, export, transfer or sale of oil, condensates, or other petroleum or petrochemical products in whole or in part from the Islamic Republic of Iran
Bureau of Land Management Mineral Spacing Act
DPA Modernization Act of 2026
To prohibit liability against those engaged in the mining, extraction, production, refinement, transportation, distribution, marketing, manufacture, or sale of energy for damages or injunctive or other relief from the use of their products, and for other purposes.
To nullify the Presidential Proclamation relating to Imposing a Temporary Import Surcharge to Address Fundamental International Payments Problems, and for other purposes.
To provide for the leasing of certain deposits of minerals located within the City of Carlsbad, New Mexico.
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 101 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Recoverable Critical Minerals and Materials
This memorandum invokes the Defense Production Act (DPA) Section 101 to declare that recoverable critical minerals and materials (such as black mass, end-of-life rare-earth magnets, and scrap) are essential to national defense and that the U.S. cannot meet defense needs without disrupting civilian markets. It directs the Secretary of Commerce to issue regulations and take actions—including priority contracts and supply-chain interventions—to rapidly expand domestic recovery and processing of these materials, while explicitly excluding copper scrap already covered by a separate proclamation.
Further Strengthening Actions Taken to Adjust Imports of Aluminum into the United States
This proclamation modifies the Section 232 tariff regime on aluminum imports by authorizing the Secretary of Commerce to establish a program that incentivizes new U.S. investment in primary aluminum production. Companies with approved onshoring plans can import primary aluminum at half the standard Section 232 duty rate, up to the anticipated annual output of their new or expanded facilities, with construction required to start by January 20, 2029. The action aims to boost domestic primary aluminum supply for national security and defense industrial base needs.
Regulatory Relief for Certain Stationary Sources to Promote American Chemical Manufacturing Security
President Trump issued a proclamation exempting certain chemical manufacturing facilities from compliance with the EPA's HON Rule for two years, citing unavailability of required technology and national security concerns. The exemption delays emissions-control deadlines and maintains pre-HON Rule standards for listed stationary sources, invoking authority under Clean Air Act section 112(i)(4).
Free — no credit card
Get the next market-moving signal before the news does
HillSignal scores every Congressional bill, federal contract, and insider filing for market impact and emails you the high-conviction ones — free, no credit card.
Weekly digest — the congressional activity that actually moved markets that week, in plain English. Free, one email.
Free forever plan · No credit card · Unsubscribe in one click
Want the live terminal too? Create a free account →