Deport Alien Gang Members Act
Summary
HR175, the Deport Alien Gang Members Act, was reported out of committee on June 3, 2026, but has no direct market impact as it does not authorize or appropriate any funding, nor does it mandate any specific spending or contracting. The bill amends immigration law to expand grounds for inadmissibility and deportability for non-U.S. nationals associated with criminal gangs, but it does not create any new government programs, contracts, or procurement opportunities. No publicly traded companies are directly affected.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.HR175 is an immigration enforcement bill with zero authorized or appropriated funding.
- 2.No publicly traded companies are directly affected by this legislation.
- 3.The bill remains early in the legislative process with no clear path to enactment.
Market Implications
This bill has no market implications. It does not authorize any spending, create any new programs, or mandate any procurement. Investors should not allocate capital based on this legislation.
Full Analysis
- On June 3, 2026, the House Judiciary Committee ordered HR175, the Deport Alien Gang Members Act, to be reported (amended) by a vote of 15-8. The bill's current status is 'Reported out of committee — awaiting floor action.' It was introduced on January 3, 2025, by Rep. McClintock (R-CA-5) and has 27 cosponsors. The bill has seen only 5 actions total, with the most recent being the committee markup. 2) The bill does not authorize or appropriate any funding. It amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to define 'criminal gang' and establish grounds for inadmissibility and deportability for non-U.S. nationals associated with such gangs. There is no money trail — no grants, contracts, tax credits, or procurement mechanisms. 3) Because the bill is purely a change in immigration enforcement policy with no spending or contracting provisions, there are no structural winners or losers among publicly traded companies. Immigration enforcement is carried out by government agencies (ICE, CBP) using existing appropriations, and this bill does not expand or contract those budgets. 4) No real market data is provided for this bill. The competitive landscape for companies that might tangentially relate to immigration enforcement (e.g., detention center operators, surveillance technology providers) is unaffected because the bill does not mandate any new procurement or spending. 5) The next legislative step is floor consideration in the House. If passed, it would go to the Senate. The bill's path to law is uncertain given its partisan nature (committee vote split 15-8 along party lines) and the lack of a Senate companion bill. Even if enacted, it would not create new market opportunities.
Key Legislators
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
To limit the Department of Homeland Security from detaining children and individuals with a cognitive disability and to prohibit immigration enforcement actions at sensitive locations without a court-issued criminal warrant.
To strengthen hiring and screening standards for immigration enforcement officers and to strengthen uniform, identification, and professional conduct standards for such officers.
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to require assimilation likelihood screenings.