To ensure delivery service providers have partnership agreements with the restaurants for which the providers deliver, and for other purposes.
Summary
HR10885, introduced by Rep. Susie Lee (D-NV), would require third-party food delivery services like DoorDash and Uber Eats to have partnership agreements with restaurants before delivering their food. The bill is in early stages, referred to the House Energy and Commerce Committee. For delivery platforms, this mandate could reduce restaurant supply and increase compliance costs, creating a bearish outlook for $DASH and $UBER.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.HR10885 would require food delivery platforms to have partnership agreements with restaurants, potentially limiting supply and increasing costs.
- 2.The bill is in early legislative stages but has bipartisan support, indicating potential for advancement.
- 3.DoorDash ($DASH) and Uber ($UBER) are the primary publicly traded companies directly affected, facing bearish regulatory headwinds.
Market Implications
The bill targets a core operational practice of food delivery platforms. While early-stage, it signals growing congressional scrutiny of gig economy business models. $DASH and $UBER may face headwinds if the bill gains momentum. Investors in these names should watch for committee hearings and markups as key milestones.
Full Analysis
HR10885 was introduced in the House on October 22, 2026, and referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The bill mandates that delivery service providers (e.g., DoorDash, Uber Eats) must have partnership agreements with the restaurants they deliver for. This is a regulatory requirement, not a funding authorization, so there is no direct government spending. The mechanism is a mandate that alters the contractual relationship between platforms and restaurants. Currently, some platforms list restaurants without explicit consent; this bill would require affirmative agreements. For DoorDash and Uber Eats, this could reduce the supply of available restaurants if some choose not to partner, and increase legal and operational costs for negotiating and maintaining agreements. The bill has bipartisan cosponsors (5 total, including both Republicans and Democrats), which may increase its legislative prospects. However, as an early-stage bill, it faces a long path: committee markup, House floor vote, Senate consideration, and potential presidential action. There are no related signals or procurement actions in the provided data, so this bill stands alone as a regulatory risk to the food delivery sector. Structural winners are restaurants, which gain bargaining power, but no publicly traded restaurant companies are directly named in the bill. The primary losers are the delivery platforms themselves.
Intelligence Surface
Cross-referenced against federal contracts, SEC insider filings & congressional trade disclosures
No confirming evidence found yet from contracts, insider trades, or congressional activity
What the bill does
mandate that delivery service providers have partnership agreements with restaurants before delivering their food
Who must act
DoorDash (food delivery platform)
What happens
DoorDash must obtain explicit partnership agreements from all restaurants it delivers for, potentially reducing the number of available restaurants on its platform if some restaurants decline to partner, and increasing legal and operational costs for negotiating agreements.
Stock impact
DoorDash's revenue is entirely derived from delivery fees and commissions from restaurant partners; a reduction in restaurant supply could decrease order volume and revenue, while compliance costs may compress margins. DoorDash has historically listed some restaurants without consent, so this bill directly targets a key aspect of its business model.
What the bill does
mandate that delivery service providers have partnership agreements with restaurants before delivering their food
Who must act
Uber (Uber Eats division)
What happens
Uber Eats must ensure all restaurants on its platform have partnership agreements, which may limit restaurant supply and increase compliance costs.
Stock impact
Uber Eats is a significant revenue segment for Uber; any restriction on restaurant supply could impact delivery revenue. Uber already has many partnerships, but the requirement may still impose additional costs and limit expansion.
Key Legislators
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
Food and Nutrition Delivery Safety Act of 2026
Car Privacy Rights Act of 2026
To enhance passenger and driver safety on transportation network company platforms through enhanced digital verification systems, to implement driver verification protocols to prevent unauthorized drivers from fraudulently using TNC driver accounts, to prevent physical and sexual assault on TNC platforms, and for other purposes.
NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT: $1.5B Department of Agriculture Grant
FERMI FORWARD DISCOVERY GROUP, LLC: $2.4B Department of Energy Contract
DELL FEDERAL SYSTEMS L.P: $1.1B Department of Veterans Affairs Contract
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND: $1.2B Department of the Treasury Federal Award
ADMINISTRACION DE DESARROLLO SOCIOECONOMICO DE LA FAMILIA: $2.5B Department of Agriculture Federal Award
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
DECREASING HOUSING COSTS FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
This executive order directs the Federal Housing Finance Agency to create pilot programs for automatic cancellation of mortgage insurance when borrowers have sufficient equity, and to expand a title insurance pilot to reduce costs for refinancing. It establishes a task force to promote manufactured housing by standardizing permits and reducing regulatory barriers. It also orders the Departments of Agriculture and Veterans Affairs to reduce interest rates on direct home loans.
Adjusting Imports of Wind Turbines and Their Parts and Components into the United States
This proclamation initiates negotiations to adjust imports of wind turbines and their components under Section 232, citing national security concerns including cybersecurity vulnerabilities, radar interference, and grid reliability. It does not immediately impose tariffs but sets the stage for potential trade restrictions, and notes that certain wind turbine components made of aluminum, steel, or copper are already subject to existing tariffs.
Advancing Women's Health to Improve Outcomes in All Phases of Life
This executive order establishes a Women's Health Division within the NIH to coordinate and accelerate research on understudied women's health conditions, and creates a White House Women's Health Task Force to drive policy reforms and translation of research into clinical practice across federal agencies. It directs specific agencies to prioritize research, data collection, and translation into prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, with a focus on all life stages from infancy through aging.
Free — no credit card
Get the next market-moving signal before the news does
HillSignal scores every Congressional bill, federal contract, and insider filing for market impact and emails you the high-conviction ones — free, no credit card.
Weekly digest — the congressional activity that actually moved markets that week, in plain English. Free, one email.
Free forever plan · No credit card · Unsubscribe in one click
Want the live terminal too? Create a free account →