CLOSE Act
Summary
The CLOSE Act (HR6081) is an early-stage House bill that would eliminate the emission aggregation exemption for oil and gas wells under the Clean Air Act and require EPA to list hydrogen sulfide as a hazardous air pollutant. While the bill has 23 Democratic cosponsors and faces a long legislative path, it creates a regulatory overhang for U.S. E&P operators. Recent DPA energy executive orders (April 2026) conflict with the bill's direction, adding policy uncertainty.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.CLOSE Act is an early-stage bill with zero legislative movement in five months — probability of passage in current Congress is low.
- 2.If enacted, bill increases operating costs for U.S. E&P companies by eliminating emission aggregation exemptions and listing hydrogen sulfide as a hazardous air pollutant.
- 3.Recent DPA executive orders (April 20, 2026) create conflicting policy signals, reducing likelihood of this bill gaining momentum.
Market Implications
The CLOSE Act represents a regulatory tail risk for domestic oil and gas producers currently priced at low probability. The bill's lack of legislative progress combined with supportive DPA energy executive orders has allowed the sector to rally recently (XOM +3.59% 7-day, CVX +3.51%, EOG +4.17%). However, the structural overhang means any sign of committee action (e.g., hearing announcement) could trigger a quick 2-5% pullback in exposed tickers. Service names (SLB, HAL, BKR) are less directly exposed but would be impacted by reduced upstream capex if the bill advances. Current trading suggests the market views this as noise, not signal. Investors should monitor Energy and Commerce Committee scheduling for any CLOSE Act hearing.
Full Analysis
- What happened: Representative Yvette Clarke (D-NY) introduced HR6081 on November 18, 2025. The bill was referred to the House Energy and Commerce Committee and has had no further action in approximately five months. It currently has 23 cosponsors, all Democrats. The bill is in a very early legislative stage with no hearings, markup, or CBO score. 2) The money trail: The CLOSE Act is a regulatory bill, not a spending bill. It authorizes zero dollars. Its impact would come from imposing new compliance costs on the oil and gas industry through EPA rulemakings. The mechanism is repeal of existing regulatory exemptions, which increases permitting and emissions control costs for E&P companies. Actual Congressional Budget Office scoring would estimate increased federal regulatory costs and potential permitting fee revenue, but no budget authority is created. 3) Structural winners and losers: Losers are U.S. onshore E&P operators with large multi-well pad operations in unconventional basins (XOM, CVX, EOG). Midstream companies with extensive gas gathering compressor stations would also face aggregation risk. Service companies (SLB, HAL, BKR) face indirect headwinds if operator drilling budgets shrink due to increased compliance costs, though their current market data shows strong recent performance (SLB +8.78% 30-day, HAL +7.28%, BKR +13.53%). Winners are environmental compliance consulting firms and emissions monitoring technology providers, but no public pure-play ticker mapping exists. 4) Recent market data: Despite the legislative overhang, the E&P and service stocks covered show mixed trends. XOM at $154.25 is up 3.59% over 7 days but down 9.08% over 30 days, indicating recent recovery from a larger selloff. CVX at $191.71 shows similar pattern (+3.51% 7-day, -7.34% 30-day). EOG at $138.68 is up 4.17% over 7 days and only down 4.07% over 30 days, outperforming the majors. The April 20 DPA orders appear to be providing a countervailing bullish catalyst for the sector, partially offsetting the CLOSE Act sentiment overhang. 5) Timeline: The CLOSE Act has zero legislative velocity — no new actions since November 2025. For this bill to advance, it would need a committee hearing, markup, floor vote in the House, Senate companion introduction and passage, and presidential action. Given the current divided Congress and conflicting executive branch signals, meaningful passage probability is low in the 119th Congress.
Intelligence Surface
Cross-referenced against federal contracts, SEC insider filings & congressional trade disclosures
Multiple independent sources confirm this signal’s market thesis
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
PANTEXAS DETERRENCE, LLC: $3.5B Department of Energy Contract
FERMI FORWARD DISCOVERY GROUP, LLC: $2.4B Department of Energy Contract
HANFORD TANK WASTE OPERATIONS & CLOSURE, LLC: $1.5B Department of Energy Contract
FERMI FORWARD DISCOVERY GROUP, LLC: $2.4B Department of Energy Contract
HANFORD TANK WASTE OPERATIONS & CLOSURE, LLC: $1.4B Department of Energy Contract
FERMI FORWARD DISCOVERY GROUP, LLC: $2.4B Department of Energy Contract
FERMI FORWARD DISCOVERY GROUP, LLC: $2.5B Department of Energy Contract
CENTRAL PLATEAU CLEANUP COMPANY, LLC: $1.0B Department of Energy Contract
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
Adjusting Imports of Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Unmanned Aircraft Systems Components into the United States
This proclamation imposes a 100% ad valorem tariff on imports of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) over 25 kg, those with thermal imagers, docking stations, and certain components, and a 25% tariff on UAS under 25 kg and other components, citing national security under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. It also authorizes the Department of Commerce to establish an onshoring program offering preferential tariff treatment for companies that build new U.S. manufacturing facilities for UAS and components.
Adjusting Imports of Polysilicon and its Derivatives into the United States
This proclamation invokes Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act to impose a minimum import price (MIP) program on polysilicon and its derivatives, a 15% ad valorem tariff on polysilicon derivatives, and directs the Secretary of Commerce to offer incentives for domestic production. It aims to protect and revive the U.S. polysilicon industry by restricting imports that threaten national security, particularly for semiconductor and solar supply chains.
Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 101 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Recoverable Critical Minerals and Materials
This memorandum invokes the Defense Production Act (DPA) Section 101 to declare that recoverable critical minerals and materials (such as black mass, end-of-life rare-earth magnets, and scrap) are essential to national defense and that the U.S. cannot meet defense needs without disrupting civilian markets. It directs the Secretary of Commerce to issue regulations and take actions—including priority contracts and supply-chain interventions—to rapidly expand domestic recovery and processing of these materials, while explicitly excluding copper scrap already covered by a separate proclamation.
Free — no credit card
Get the next market-moving signal before the news does
HillSignal scores every Congressional bill, federal contract, and insider filing for market impact and emails you the high-conviction ones — free, no credit card.
Weekly digest — the congressional activity that actually moved markets that week, in plain English. Free, one email.
Free forever plan · No credit card · Unsubscribe in one click
Want the live terminal too? Create a free account →