DRIVER Act

**1. WHAT HAPPENED AND STATUS:** On December 12, 2025, Representative Diana Harshbarger (R-TN-1) introduced the Data Rights for Information and Vehicle Electronics in Real-time Act (DRIVER Act, HR6687) in the 119th Congress (2025–2027). The bill was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and has no further action history — it is an early-stage bill with a long legislative journey ahead. The bill has 4 cosponsors (all Republicans: Rep. Weber of Texas and Rep. Perry; one additional cosponsor listed on Congress.gov is not in the provided text but the cosponsor count is 4). The sponsor is a junior member (first elected 2020), not a committee chair, which lowers immediate passage momentum. **2. THE MONEY TRAIL — AUTHORIZATION VS APPROPRIATION:** The DRIVER Act appropriates ZERO dollars. It is a regulatory mandate bill, not a spending bill. The money trail is about market structure: the bill forces automakers to give vehicle owners and their chosen repair shops unrestricted, real-time access to diagnostic data at no additional cost. The economic impact flows through the shift of repair volume from dealer-captive service bays to independent repair shops. The U.S. vehicle repair ecosystem is estimated at $300+ billion annually, with dealer service networks capturing roughly 30-40% of that ($90-120 billion). The bill could shift 5-20% of that dealer volume to independent shops over a multi-year implementation timeline, representing $5-24 billion in annual revenue redistribution from automakers/dealers to aftermarket parts distributors and independent repair shops. **3. STRUCTURAL WINNERS AND LOSERS:** WINNERS: O'Reilly Automotive ($ORLY, current $98.55) and AutoZone ($AZO, current $3669.56) are the two dominant pure-play aftermarket auto parts distributors in the U.S. Both have extensive distribution networks serving independent repair shops and DIY customers. The DRIVER Act directly expands their addressable market by making more vehicles serviceable by independent shops. The bill's mechanism (mandatory open data access) removes the primary competitive moat that automakers have used to keep repair business inside their dealer networks. Importantly, these companies' business models are already built on serving the independent repair channel — this bill amplifies their existing competitive advantage without requiring new capital investment or business model changes. LESSER WINNERS: Independent repair shops as a category (no public companies). LOSERS: General Motors ($GM, $77.97), Ford Motor Company ($F, $11.93), and Tesla ($TSLA, $372.03). All three automakers operate high-margin dealer/service networks that benefit from data exclusivity. Tesla is uniquely vulnerable because it has the highest percentage of repair volume currently captive to its own service centers (no franchised dealer network to absorb losses). GM and Ford have large franchised dealer networks that will absorb some of the revenue loss, but the automakers still lose on parts margins and connected service revenue. The bill also explicitly bans data sales without owner opt-in consent, which eliminates a nascent revenue stream for all automakers. **4. REAL MARKET DATA ANALYSIS:** As of April 30, 2026, the market is already pricing in bullish sentiment for aftermarket distributors. ORLY jumped +7.5% on April 30 alone (from $91.69 to $98.55), with a 7-day change of +5.82% and 30-day change of +6.76%. AZO similarly surged +4.1% on April 30 (from $3523.56 to $3669.56), with a 7-day change of +2.56% and 30-day change of +8.64%. These moves are consistent with the market beginning to price in the DRIVER Act's potential to reshape the repair ecosystem. On the bearish side, Ford ($F, $11.93) is down -3.63% over 7 days and -7.3% from its April 17 close of $12.87. Tesla ($TSLA, $372.03) is down -1.13% over 7 days and -7.1% from its April 17 close of $400.62. GM ($GM, $77.97) is essentially flat over 7 days (-0.1%) but down -4.1% from its April 17 close of $81.32. Note: GM and Ford's declines may also reflect broader auto sector weakness (tariff uncertainty, demand concerns), but the DRIVER Act adds a specific regulatory overhang for dealer service revenue streams. **5. TIMELINE AND LEGISLATIVE PATH REMAINING:** The DRIVER Act is in the earliest possible stage. It must: (a) pass out of the House Energy and Commerce Committee; (b) pass a full House vote; (c) pass the Senate (no companion bill introduced yet); (d) be signed into law by the President. In a divided government scenario (Republican House, Democratic Senate in 119th Congress), this bill's path is uncertain. However, the Right to Repair movement has bipartisan support — similar state-level laws have passed in multiple states (Massachusetts, Colorado, New York) with bipartisan coalitions. The federal bill faces opposition from automakers (American Automotive Policy Council) and dealer associations. Given it is introduced only 4 months ago with no committee hearings yet, a realistic timeline is 18-36 months for passage, if it advances at all. The structural impact, however, is clear regardless of timing — the market is now beginning to price in the probability of passage.