To require data center operators to submit to States or the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Secretaries of Energy and Agriculture reports on data center energy and water use, and for other purposes.
Summary
HR9825, introduced by Rep. Underwood (D-IL) and referred to the House Energy and Commerce Committee, requires data center operators to report energy and water usage to state or federal agencies. The bill is in early legislative stages with no funding, no cosponsors, and no compliance penalties. Market impact is neutral: the reporting adds minor administrative costs for operators like $EQIX, $DLR, $AMZN, $MSFT, and $GOOGL, but does not alter revenue, operations, or competitive dynamics.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.HR9825 is a procedural reporting bill with no funding, no authorizations, and no enforcement mechanisms.
- 2.Data center operators face negligible compliance costs; no impact on revenues, margins, or competitive positions.
- 3.The bill has low legislative momentum (single sponsor, no cosponsors, early stage) and unlikely to advance in this Congress.
Market Implications
The reporting mandate imposes trivial administrative costs. Data center REITs like Equinix and Digital Realty continue to trade on data center demand, AI workloads, and power availability—not on disclosure paperwork. Hyperscalers ($AMZN, , $GOOGL) remain driven by cloud revenue growth and AI capex cycles. Investors should ignore this bill as a market signal.
⚡ Government Convergence
This signal is one of the converging government actions below.
Over the last 90 days, 9 separate government actions have converged on AI Compute / Datacenter Power. What that means: federal dollars are already moving — agencies are soliciting bids and awarding contracts, not just talking, and legislation and executive action are building the policy and funding tailwind behind it. When independent channels move together like this — 6 bills, 1 procurement notices, 1 insider buys and 1 federal contracts — it's the clearest early tell that Washington is committing to ai compute / datacenter power, the kind of build-up that reshapes the sector well before it's obvious in the headlines.
Converging government actions
- ContractINTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION: AWARD, ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING SUPPORT (AES) SERVICES, USCIS ENTERPRISE INFRASTRUCTURE DIVISIO · 2026-07-24
- BillTo require that new and existing data centers use off-grid power and water supplies, and for other purposes. · 2026-07-20
- Procurement noticeFire Alarm System, Sprinkler System and Fire Pump Testing and Inspection services at Mineta San Jose International Airport, Air Traffic Cont · 2026-07-28
- BillMATCH Act of 2026 · 2026-07-21
- BillA bill to exempt AI data centers from bonus depreciation and require data center operators to submit certain information relating to electri · 2026-07-21
- Insider buyInsider buy: FTAI Infrastructure Inc. ($45,800) · 2026-05-28
- BillTo prohibit Artificial Intelligence Data Centers on Federal land. · 2026-07-23
- BillTo require data center operators to submit to States or the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Secretaries of Ener · 2026-07-22
Full Analysis
HR9825 was introduced on July 22, 2026, and referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The bill mandates that data center operators submit reports on energy and water consumption to either the relevant state agency, the EPA Administrator, or the Secretaries of Energy and Agriculture. At this stage, the bill has no cosponsors and has not seen committee hearings. Legislative momentum is low.
The bill authorizes zero funding—it is a reporting mandate, not an appropriations bill. There is no tax credit, grant program, or procurement attached. The reporting requirement itself imposes compliance costs, but the amounts are de minimis relative to the revenues of major operators. Equinix and Digital Realty may see a few million in added overhead; hyperscalers like Amazon ($AMZN), Microsoft, and Alphabet ($GOOGL) will absorb costs with no measurable earnings impact.
There is no convergence with other legislative signals or executive actions. The two recent presidential proclamations—chemical manufacturing relief and Bears Ears expansion—are unrelated to data center reporting. The bill stands alone as an isolated transparency measure.
Structural winners and losers: No company benefits from a pure reporting mandate. The bill does not penalize high usage or reward efficiency. Data center operators face no operational constraints. Utilities that supply power to data centers are unaffected since the obligation falls on the operator, not the utility. The inclusion of the Secretary of Agriculture is unusual but likely reflects water use concerns in agricultural regions; no material impact on agriculture companies.
The legislative timeline is uncertain: committee markup, floor vote in the House, Senate companion introduction, and presidential action are all pending. Given the partisan nature (single Democratic sponsor, no cosponsors) and the 119th Congress's focus on energy dominance, the bill's passage probability is low.
Intelligence Surface
Cross-referenced against federal contracts, SEC insider filings & congressional trade disclosures
Limited confirming evidence — causal thesis exists but few external signals
What the bill does
Reporting obligation for data center energy and water use under HR9825; AWS is the largest cloud provider with massive data center footprint.
Who must act
Amazon Web Services as a data center operator; AWS accounts for ~16% of Amazon's total revenue (FY2025 ~$620B).
What happens
Compliance cost is a rounding error for Amazon (<0.01% of revenue). AWS already publicly reports sustainability metrics; incremental burden minimal.
Stock impact
No material financial impact. Reporting may increase transparency but does not constrain AWS growth or pricing. No competitive disadvantage vs peers.
What the bill does
Reporting requirement for data center energy and water consumption; Google Cloud and internal data centers are covered.
Who must act
Alphabet's data center fleet; Google has committed to 24/7 carbon-free energy by 2030 and already tracks detailed metrics.
What happens
Compliance overlap with existing reporting; incremental cost negligible. No changes to energy procurement or data center expansion plans.
Stock impact
Zero revenue or profit impact. GOOGL has ample resources to comply. The bill does not alter Google's competitive position in cloud or advertising.
Key Legislators
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
To require that new and existing data centers use off-grid power and water supplies, and for other purposes.
MATCH Act of 2026
A bill to exempt AI data centers from bonus depreciation and require data center operators to submit certain information relating to electricity and water use by data centers, and for other purposes.
A bill to support an interdisciplinary research community for the advancement of artificial intelligence and AI-powered innovation through partnerships and capacity building at certain institutions of higher education and other institutions, and for other purposes.
To prohibit Artificial Intelligence Data Centers on Federal land.
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
Actions by the United States in the Investigations under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 of the Acts, Policies, and Practices of 60 Economies Related to the Failure of Each Economy to Impose and Effectively Enforce a Prohibition on the Importation of Goods Produced with Forced Labor
This Presidential Memorandum directs the U.S. Trade Representative to impose Section 301 tariffs on imports from 60 economies due to their failure to prohibit or effectively enforce forced labor import bans. Tariffs are set at 10% ad valorem for certain economies with partial enforcement or commitments, and 12.5% for others, with exemptions for raw materials and products causing domestic supply issues, and plans for textile tariff-rate quotas by September 2026. The action aims to eliminate the identified unreasonable trade practices through these tariffs and incentives.
Securing America’s Defense Supply Chains and Ensuring Domestic Acquisition of Critical Materials
This executive order restricts waivers for foreign-sourced critical materials in defense contracts, effective January 1, 2027, and mandates that defense contractors map their supply chains from raw materials to end products, vet subcontractors for risks, and prohibit covered materials from unreliable foreign suppliers. It directs the Secretary of War to enforce strict compliance, including requiring mitigation plans for any non-compliant materials and establishing penalties for fraud or willful noncompliance.
Modifying the Bears Ears National Monument
This proclamation reverses the 2021 expansion of Bears Ears National Monument, reducing its protected area from approximately 1.36 million acres to about 121,096 acres. It invokes the Antiquities Act to exclude lands deemed not meeting legal criteria for monument status, returning them to prior federal multi-use management (BLM/USFS) and freeing them for non-monument uses like energy development, mining, and grazing.
Free — no credit card
Get the next market-moving signal before the news does
HillSignal scores every Congressional bill, federal contract, and insider filing for market impact and emails you the high-conviction ones — free, no credit card.
Weekly digest — the congressional activity that actually moved markets that week, in plain English. Free, one email.
Free forever plan · No credit card · Unsubscribe in one click
Want the live terminal too? Create a free account →