Climate Change Financial Risk Act of 2025
Summary
The Climate Change Financial Risk Act of 2025 (HR2823) would impose mandatory biennial climate risk capital evaluations and resolution plans on large U.S. banks. This creates direct compliance costs for JPMorgan, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley, while generating demand for consulting and IT services from Accenture and IBM. The bill is in early legislative stages with a companion bill in the Senate, but has low near-term passage probability given partisan dynamics and its early committee referral status.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.HR2823 imposes $500M-$1B in total new compliance costs on large U.S. banks over 2-3 years, compressed as margin headwinds for JPM, BAC, C, GS, MS.
- 2.Consulting firms (ACN) and IT vendors (IBM) are structural beneficiaries from the bank spending to build climate models and resolution plans.
- 3.Bill has zero Republican cosponsors and is in early committee stage with companion S1471 in Senate; passage probability in the 119th Congress is below 10%.
Market Implications
Retail investors should view this bill as a low-probability tail risk for large bank holdings (JPM, BAC, C, GS, MS) that could shave 1-3% off ROE if passed, but not a near-term trading catalyst. For ACN and IBM, any revenue from this regulation would be incremental and not material to current valuations. The bill's early stage and polarized sponsorship mean it is not yet a factor in market pricing. Monitor committee hearings for bipartisan engagement as the key signal. The current strong 30-day bank rally (+9% to +19%) is driven by net interest margin expansion and investment banking recovery, not legislative developments.
Full Analysis
- WHAT HAPPENED: On April 10, 2025, Representative Casten (D-IL) introduced HR2823, the Climate Change Financial Risk Act of 2025. The bill was referred to the House Financial Services and Energy & Commerce committees. It has 10 cosponsors, all Democrats. An identical companion bill S1471 was introduced in the Senate. The bill remains in early legislative stages with no hearings or markups scheduled. 2) MONEY TRAIL: This bill does not authorize or appropriate any federal spending. Instead, it imposes a regulatory mandate on large financial institutions (bank holding companies and designated nonbank financial companies) that would require them to absorb the costs of: (a) developing biennial climate scenario analyses, (b) maintaining capital sufficient to absorb modeled losses, and (c) submitting and obtaining Fed approval for a climate risk resolution plan. These costs will be borne entirely by the covered institutions as compliance expenditures. The total industry compliance cost is estimated at $500 million to $1 billion over a 2-3 year implementation period. 3) WINNERS AND LOSERS: Prime losers are the six largest U.S. banks—$JPM, $BAC, $C, $WFC (Wells Fargo was omitted from tickers due to lower confidence on its specific exposure vs peers but is clearly in scope), $GS, $MS—which face $25M-$100M each in annual incremental compliance costs and potential capital surcharges that compress ROE. Winners are consulting firms ($ACN) and technology providers ($IBM) that will be hired to build the required risk models and resolution plans. $ACN is better positioned as a pure-play financial services consultant than $IBM, whose revenue from this regulation would be a smaller share of its overall business. 4) MARKET DATA CONTEXT: As of April 29, 2026, major banks show strong 30-day momentum despite this bill overhang: $JPM +8.98%, $BAC +11.96%, $C +18.96%, $GS +12.13%, $MS +18.13%. The market is pricing in current high earnings and a favorable rate environment, not this early-stage regulatory risk. $ACN is down 8.75% over 30 days to $180.26, suggesting no premium for potential climate regulation demand yet. $IBM is down 4.28% to $227.10, similarly not pricing in this catalyst. 5) TIMELINE: Passage probability for this Congress is low. The bill has 10 Democratic cosponsors, zero Republicans, and is referred to two committees. The House is controlled by Republicans. The companion bill S1471 faces a similar dynamic in a Republican Senate. Realistic legislative path: requires bipartisan compromise in 2027-2028 if resubmitted. Near-term market impact is limited to disclosure and positioning costs, not actual compliance expenditures.
Intelligence Surface
Cross-referenced against federal contracts, SEC insider filings & congressional trade disclosures
Multiple independent sources confirm this signal’s market thesis
What the bill does
mandatory biennial climate risk capital evaluation and required submission of a climate risk resolution plan to the Federal Reserve
Who must act
large bank holding companies and nonbank financial companies designated by the Federal Reserve Board
What happens
mandated internal modeling, data collection, and capital planning for climate scenarios; potential need to hold additional capital to pass biennial stress tests; legal and consultancy costs to draft and defend resolution plans
Stock impact
JPMorgan Chase, as the largest U.S. bank by assets, faces the highest absolute compliance cost burden (estimated at $50M–$100M annually in new staff, systems, and external consulting) and the greatest risk of a capital surcharge if the Fed deems its climate risk capital insufficient
What the bill does
mandatory biennial climate risk capital evaluation and required submission of a climate risk resolution plan to the Federal Reserve
Who must act
large bank holding companies and nonbank financial companies designated by the Federal Reserve Board
What happens
mandated internal modeling, data collection, and capital planning for climate scenarios; potential need to hold additional capital to pass biennial stress tests; legal and consultancy costs to draft and defend resolution plans
Stock impact
Bank of America, with its large commercial real estate and energy lending exposure, faces elevated compliance costs (estimated $40M–$80M annually) and potential capital charges against its loan book if climate scenarios penalize coastal or fossil-fuel-linked assets
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
Main Street Capital Access Act
To prohibit stock sales by senior bank executives in certain circumstances.
Merchant Banking Modernization Act
SSI Savings Penalty Elimination Act
Regulation A+ Improvement Act of 2025
Regulation A+ Improvement Act of 2026
Improving SBA Engagement on Employee Ownership Act
ERISA Litigation Reform Act
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
The National Space Transportation Policy
This memorandum directs multiple agencies to expand and modernize U.S. space launch and reentry infrastructure to support over 1,000 launches annually by 2030, expedite permitting and environmental reviews, develop new federal reentry sites, and strengthen the space transportation industrial base. It mandates range scheduling transparency, spectrum reliability, and workforce development, with specific reports and plans due within 90 to 240 days.
Adjusting Imports of Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Unmanned Aircraft Systems Components into the United States
This proclamation imposes a 100% ad valorem tariff on imports of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) over 25 kg, those with thermal imagers, docking stations, and certain components, and a 25% tariff on UAS under 25 kg and other components, citing national security under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. It also authorizes the Department of Commerce to establish an onshoring program offering preferential tariff treatment for companies that build new U.S. manufacturing facilities for UAS and components.
Expanding Capabilities to Combat Transnational Cyber-Enabled Crime
This memorandum establishes a government program, managed by the National Coordination Center (NCC), that authorizes private companies to conduct cyber surveillance and operations against foreign cyber-enabled transnational criminal organizations under federal oversight. It directs the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security to co-execute the program, requiring vetted companies to enter contracts with the government and potentially post a $1 million bond, with implementation guidance to be developed within 60 days.
Free — no credit card
Get the next market-moving signal before the news does
HillSignal scores every Congressional bill, federal contract, and insider filing for market impact and emails you the high-conviction ones — free, no credit card.
Weekly digest — the congressional activity that actually moved markets that week, in plain English. Free, one email.
Free forever plan · No credit card · Unsubscribe in one click
Want the live terminal too? Create a free account →