A bill to amend the Securities Act of 1933 to expand the ability to use testing the waters and confidential draft registration submissions, and for other purposes.
Summary
S4690, introduced by Sen. Budd (R-NC), proposes expanding testing the waters and confidential draft registration for IPOs. The bill is in early committee stage with no funding authorization. It modestly benefits investment banks and asset managers by reducing IPO friction, but market impact is limited until passage.
See which stocks are affected
Key takeaways, market implications, full AI analysis, and connected signals are available to HillSignal members.
Already have an account? Log in
Key Takeaways
- 1.S4690 is an early-stage bill that would expand confidential IPO filings, benefiting investment banks like $GS and $MS.
- 2.No funding is authorized; impact is regulatory easing, not direct spending.
- 3.Passage probability is low; market impact is minimal until committee action.
Market Implications
The bill's impact on equity markets is negligible at this stage. Investment banks and $MS may see a slight positive sentiment if the bill gains committee traction, but no material revenue change is expected until passage. Asset managers $BLK and brokerages $SCHW are even less affected. Investors should monitor committee hearings for signs of momentum, but no action is warranted now.
Full Analysis
On June 4, 2026, Sen. Ted Budd (R-NC) introduced S4690, a bill to amend the Securities Act of 1933 to expand the ability of issuers to use testing the waters communications and confidential draft registration submissions. The bill was read twice and referred to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. It has four cosponsors and is in early legislative stages with no committee markup or floor vote scheduled.
The bill does not authorize or appropriate any funding. Its mechanism is purely regulatory: it reduces pre-IPO disclosure burdens by allowing more issuers to confidentially engage with SEC staff and gauge investor interest before public filing. This lowers IPO preparation costs and timelines, potentially increasing IPO volume. The money trail flows through investment banking fees—underwriters like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley ($MS) earn a percentage of IPO proceeds. Asset managers like BlackRock ($BLK) and brokerages like Charles Schwab ($SCHW) see secondary benefits from increased securities and trading activity.
Structural winners are bulge-bracket investment banks with strong equity underwriting franchises. The bill does not directly affect commercial banks like JPMorgan ($JPM) or Bank of America ($BAC) beyond their investment banking arms, but those are already captured by and $MS. No tickers are bearish—the bill is a procedural easing that reduces costs for all market participants. The impact is modest because IPO volume is driven more by market conditions than regulatory friction.
No real market data on stock prices is provided. The bill's early stage means no immediate market reaction is warranted. Competitive landscape: and $MS dominate US IPO underwriting with ~20% market share each; $BLK and $SCHW are secondary beneficiaries. The bill's passage probability is low given its early stage and lack of bipartisan cosponsors.
Timeline: The bill must clear the Banking Committee, pass the Senate, and then the House. With the 119th Congress ending January 2027, passage this session is uncertain. No companion bill has been introduced in the House.
Intelligence Surface
Cross-referenced against federal contracts, SEC insider filings & congressional trade disclosures
No confirming evidence found yet from contracts, insider trades, or congressional activity
What the bill does
Expansion of testing the waters and confidential draft registration submissions under the Securities Act of 1933
Who must act
Issuers conducting IPOs and their underwriters, including Morgan Stanley
What happens
Reduced pre-IPO disclosure burden and earlier confidential engagement with SEC staff, lowering IPO preparation costs and shortening timeline to market
Stock impact
Morgan Stanley, as a top IPO underwriter, benefits from increased IPO volume and reduced deal execution risk; estimated 1-2% increase in investment banking revenue from equity underwriting
What the bill does
Expansion of testing the waters and confidential draft registration submissions under the Securities Act of 1933
Who must act
Issuers conducting IPOs and their underwriters; BlackRock as a major asset manager may see increased demand for IPO-related investment products
What happens
Increased IPO activity leads to more investable securities and potential for new ETF or fund offerings tied to IPO markets
Stock impact
BlackRock benefits from higher asset management fees if IPO volume increases, but impact is marginal given $138.6B in assets; estimated <0.5% revenue uplift
Key Legislators
Connected Signals
Matched on shared policy language across AI analyses, with ticker & timing weight
Discount Window Preparedness Act
A bill to amend title 31, United States Code, to require only foreign entities to report beneficial ownership information, and for other purposes.
A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income charitable distributions from certain employer-sponsored retirement plans, and for other purposes.
No Housing Welfare for Illegal Aliens Act
ABLE Tomorrow Act
Skill Savings Account Act of 2026
Presidential Memorandum: Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Development, Manufacturing, and Deployment of Large-Scale Energy and Energy‑Related Infrastructure
Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025
Related Presidential Actions
Executive orders & memoranda affecting the same sectors or companies
Implementing Schedule Policy/Career in the Excepted Service
This executive order expands the Schedule Policy/Career excepted service category, transferring certain federal positions from competitive service to at-will employment to facilitate removal for poor performance or misconduct. It directs agency heads to petition for reclassification of policy-influencing roles, mandates performance bonus pools for these employees, and amends civil service rules to exempt them from standard adverse action procedures.
Restoring Integrity to America’s Financial System
This executive order directs the Treasury Department to issue an advisory to financial institutions on risks from non-work authorized populations and their employers, propose regulatory changes to strengthen Bank Secrecy Act customer due diligence and identification requirements, and consider risks from foreign consular IDs. It also directs the CFPB to clarify that deportation risk can affect ability-to-repay assessments for non-work authorized borrowers, and federal financial regulators to issue guidance on credit risks from this population.
Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks
This executive order directs federal financial regulators to review and streamline regulations that hinder fintech innovation, particularly for small and emerging firms, and requests the Federal Reserve to evaluate expanding access to its payment accounts and services for non-bank and digital asset firms. It aims to reduce barriers to entry and encourage partnerships between fintech firms and traditional financial institutions, with specific deadlines for reviews and reports.