Sources SoughtPosted Oct 8, 2026·Responses due Nov 9, 2026

Loaded Cartridge Assembly (MC91) for MK 5 Mod ) Explosive Bolt

NAVSEA, naval shipyards and surface/undersea warfare centers · NSWC INDIAN HEAD DIVISION

Stage
Early notice (sources sought, presolicitation or special notice)
NAICS
325920
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
N00174-26-RFPREQ-W71-0030
Set-aside
None stated
PSC
1377
Place
Not stated
Contact
Gerardo Ilaria (gerardo.ilaria.civ@us.navy.mil)
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation N00174-26-RFPREQ-W71-0030 in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
  • Oct 8, 2026 · this notice
    Sources Sought
Solicitation
None posted
Award
Not yet. Typical award: May 5, 2027 to Jan 1, 2028, middle of the range Aug 14, 2027.
Measured from 47 past early notices at Dept of the Navy with NAICS 325920 that later posted an award (middle half of cases, counted from Oct 8, 2026).

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
  • Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
  • Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.

What the notice says

This announcement should not be construed as a commitment by the U.S. Government. The U.S. Navy does not intend to award a contract based on this Request for Information/Sources Sought Notice. THIS IS NOT A Request for a Proposal AND DOES NOT OBLIGATE THE U.S. GOVERNMENT TO ISSUE an RFP. This RFI is for U.S. Government planning purposes only and constitutes requests for exchange of information pursuant to FAR Part 10. The Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head Division (NSWC IHD), Contracts Department, Code 02 is conducting Market Research on the Loaded Cartridge Assembly, DODIC MC91. NSWC … (show all)

IHD is conducting a market survey to identify sources/vendors capable of supplying the MC91 cartridge satisfying the following requirements: 1. The cartridge needs to meet the criteria specified by WS6061 and WS6052, ADL 2429839, their lower-tier documents, and be compatible with the MK 5 MOD 0 Explosive Bolt (M254), a critical component on the AN/BST-1 Buoy system. The Technical Data Package (TDP) contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, U.S.C., Sec 2751, et seq.). To receive the TDP, interested vendors must submit a written request accompanied by an approved DD Form 2345 (Military Critical Technical Data Agreement), signed NDA, and active CAGE code. 2. Contractor must be able to stand up a manufacturing line and be able to support the U.S. Government by providing all deliveries within one year of award. 3. Procurement includes production units (QTY 100) as well as all associated destructive test samples required for qualification and acceptance. This procurement includes the manufacture, testing (including nondestructive testing (NDT/radiographic) capabilities), packaging, and delivery of the MC91 Cartridge Assembly. Request your company provide responses to the following questionnaire: Does your company have a production line available that can meet the requirements mentioned above? If yes, describe your company's history and experience with supplying this item (or similar cartridges for explosive bolts) including the total number supplied to date and how the facilities are ready to support USG requirements. What is your company�s availability of inert metal parts or existing validated energetic loading lines? If the MC91 cartridges are not currently in stock, when would they be available for delivery? How many days or months after an award? Can your Company provide the rate of production the manufacturing facility is capable of per year? Can your company provide a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) unit price estimate based on the stated quantity of 100 production units plus required test samples, along with estimated stepped pricing for higher production rates? Do test reports exist that demonstrate the MC91 (or similar cartridges for explosive bolts) manufacturing accuracy and reliability? Actual reports are not required to be submitted as part of this request for information but will be accepted after your initial response to this request. Are you able to supply documented ability of your company's MC91 cartridges to function reliably with the MK 5 MOD 0 Explosive Bolt? Does your facility hold the necessary ATF licensing, Net Explosive Weight (NEW) storage capacity, and compliance with DoD 4145.26-M to manufacture, assemble, and store loaded MC91 cartridges? Describe your inspection capabilities for energetic components, specifically hermetic seal testing (helium leak rate) and real-time radiography (X-ray) for internal explosive pellet/column alignment. What are the lead times for primary energetic ingredients/mixes and specialized metal hardware required by WS6061 and WS6052? Are any materials obsolete or sole-sourced? Does your company possess or capability to produce all tooling, crimping dies, and electrical/bridgewire resistance test fixtures required to manufacture this item, or would Government-Furnished Equipment/Tooling (GFE/GFT) be required? Small Business Subcontracting & Nonmanufacturer Rule Compliance: If responding as a Small Business prime under NAICS 325920, please clarify your manufacturing approach: Does your company intend to perform at least 50% of the cost of manufacturing (excluding material costs) in-house at your own safety-approved facility? If you do not manufacture the cartridges in-house, do you intend to source the MC91 cartridges from another domestic small business manufacturer? If you intend to partner with a large business manufacturer, are you aware of the requirements to obtain an individual SBA Nonmanufacturer Rule (NMR) waiver prior to solicitation close? All interested sources shall provide the organization name, address, point of contact, phone number, e-mail address, business size, Unique Entity ID, and CAGE Code. In addition, all interested sources shall provide a summary of their company�s capabilities and delivery timeframe and schedule. All responding sources must email their response submissions no later than 17:00 Eastern Time on November 9, 2026 to the Point of Contacts (POCs) listed below. Submissions must be in PDF format and shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages in total. 1) NSWC IHD Attn: Michael Persinger Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806 Michael.a.persinger2.civ@us.navy.mil 2) NSWC IHD Attn: Gerardo Ilaria Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5000 gerardo.ilaria.civ@us.navy.mil

Who won similar work

6 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Match: Same agency (NAVSEA, naval shipyards and surface/undersea warfare centers), same NAICS 325920.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION · $SAIC1$241.7MOct 24, 2025
SYQWEST LLC · $CTS1$7.9MJul 31, 2025
LEVISON ENTERPRISES LLC1$7.1MSep 4, 2025
PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS CO CALIFORNIA LLC · $RAL1$2.8MSep 24, 2026
Teledyne RISI, Inc.1$2.1MMar 25, 2025
ENSIGN-BICKFORD AEROSPACE & DEFENSE COMPANY1$602KJul 11, 2025

Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in.

Latest awards

Competitive landscape

For the 6 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 0 of these past winners lobbied Navy, Dept of or U.S. Marines since 2024 (0 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Navy, Dept of or U.S. Marines job
  • $94K from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Armed Services, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Armed Services
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards.

  • 3 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 1 insider buys and 4 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.