Combined Synopsis/SolicitationPosted Jul 22, 2026·Responses due Aug 3, 2026

Track System Safety Research

Transportation (all) · SYS CNTR

Stage
Open solicitation
NAICS
541330
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
6913G626Q300043
Set-aside
No Set aside used
PSC
R499
Place
Cambridge, MA, USA
Contact
Karen M. Marino (karen.marino@dot.gov)
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation 6913G626Q300043 in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
None posted
Solicitation
  • Jul 22, 2026 · this notice
    Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
  • Aug 4, 2026
    Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
    Open
Award
Not yet. Too few past cases at this agency to estimate timing (6 found; 10 needed).

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Decide bid or no bid before the response deadline.
  • Look at the past winners for likely competitors and teaming partners.
  • Follow the opportunity to hear about amendments and the award.

What the notice says

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation. Offers are being requested and a separate written solicitation will not be issued. Solicitation No. 6913G626Q300043 is issued as a Request for Quotation (RFQ). This solicitation is being conducted under FAR Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Items and FAR Part 13, Simplified Acquisition Procedures. This solicitation docum… (show all)

ent and Incorporated provisions are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2026-01, effective 03/13/2026. The NAICS Code is 541330; the Small Business size standard is $25.5M. This solicitation incorporates provisions and clauses; full text of provisions and clauses may be accessed electronically at http://www.acquisition.gov/far-overhaul The U.S. Department of Transportation/John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe Center) intends to solicit and award on a sole source basis with David Jeong, North Reading, MA, in accordance with FAR 6.103-1(a) and (b). The Volpe Center has a requirement for Track System Safety Research Rail Integrity Consulting Services. The contractor shall provide engineering consulting services to the Volpe Center on track system safety research. The comprehensive management of track safety requires a unified analytical framework that addresses both track buckling (compressive failure) and rail breaks (tensile/fracture failure). This highly specialized, deep historical knowledge and technical expertise will assist the Volpe Center with providing support to the Federal Railroad Administration�s (FRA) Track Safety Research Program, in accordance with the Statement of Work (SOW) below. STATEMENT OF WORK (Begin) 1. Scope of Work The Contractor must provide engineering consulting services to the U.S. DOT Volpe National Transportation Systems Center�s (Volpe Center) Structures and Dynamics Division in support of the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Track Safety Research Program. This effort focuses on track system safety research, specifically the prevention of rail failures and track buckling. The Contractor must perform recorded 1-hour technical consultations and deliver associated presentations, technical white papers, and electronic data files throughout the base and option periods. 2. Background The U.S. DOT Volpe Center has supported FRA�s Track Safety Research Program since the 1970s. This program focuses on mitigating the risks of track failures. Preventing failures is critical because a broken rail or bucked track can derail a train. Derailments can cause service interruptions, environmental damage, and loss of life. Rail failures typically occur due to fatigue crack (defect) growth from service loads of passing trains repeatedly subject the rail to wheel contact forces and bending, causing defects to form and grow [1]. Rail Failures: Rail defects grow slowly at first but accelerate over time. Without repair, a defect can reach a critical size and fracture the rail. The industry calls the period from when a defect becomes visible to when it reaches critical size the "slow crack-growth life [2]." Railroads measure this life in million gross tons (MGT) of traffic. A primary goal of rail integrity research is to set rail inspection frequencies based on this safe crack-growth life. Volpe Center research helps establish these guidelines. Because railroads continue to increase traffic density and axle loads, the FRA must update its inspection strategies. Researchers use modern advances in metal fatigue, solid mechanics, fracture mechanics, and nondestructive inspection to improve these strategies. Today, surface damage is more likely to lead to broken rails than manufacturing defects, and surface damage can disrupt modern inspection technologies [1]. Track Buckling: Railroads must also manage rail neutral temperature (RNT) to prevent rail pull-aparts and lateral track buckling in continuous welded rail. If the RNT is too high compared to the actual rail temperature, cold weather can generate large tensile forces, accelerating crack growth and eventually fracturing the rail. Conversely, if the RNT is too low, hot weather can generate large compressive forces and buckle the track. If a rail breaks or buckles, railroads must adjust and re-weld it. Railroads maintain the RNT at a controlled level (approximately 90 �F) that withstands stress at both maximum and minimum rail temperatures. 3. Objective The Contractor must provide engineering consulting services to the Volpe Center on track system safety research. These consulting services consist of 1-hour recorded video calls with Volpe Center staff in the Structures and Dynamics Division and the preparation of presentation materials. In preparing presentation materials, the Contractor may: Review and assess rail integrity accidents, technology, and research. Analyze track infrastructure and its components under various loading conditions. Formulate recommendations for track system safety research and technologies needed to reduce broken rail and track buckling derailments. These services will help the Volpe Center provide technical support to the FRA Track Safety Research Program. The deliverables associated with these objectives consist of technical presentations and all electronic data files developed to perform the tasks. 4. Description of Work The work occurs over a 1-year base period and two 1-year option periods, organized under the following Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs): CLIN 0100: Base Period (Months 1�12) CLIN 0200: Option Year 1 (Months 13�24) CLIN 0300: Option Year 2 (Months 25�36) The Contractor must perform the following tasks continuously across the base period and any exercised option periods. Task 1 � Track Buckling The Contractor must provide engineering consulting services by leading recorded 1-hour technical virtual or in-person meetings. Topics include: Engineering analysis of track buckling incidents. Current industry practices for rail neutral temperature (RNT) management to prevent track buckling, including simplifying assumptions and limitations. FRA-sponsored research addressing RNT assumptions and new technologies. FRA training and software for RNT management. Global sensitivity analyses applied to track buckling models. Task 2 � Rail Failures The Contractor must provide engineering consulting services by leading recorded 1-hour technical virtual or in-person meetings. Topics include: Engineering analysis of rail safety incidents involving cold weather rail pull-aparts. RNT management practices to prevent rail pull-aparts. Updates to the slow crack-growth life model developed by Orringer et al. Global sensitivity analyses on rail integrity models, including critical defect size and slow crack-growth life. Rolling contact fatigue management and transition to transverse defect. Effects of contact stresses, residual stresses, and rail head wear on rail integrity. The Contractor must provide presentations on a quarterly basis, a technical white paper prior to the conclusion of each CLIN period, and any electronic data files used to create the deliverables. 5. Government Furnished Information The Government will furnish secure access to the source code for the slow crack growth model under Task 2 Rail Failures. If the Government requests engineering analyses of track buckling or rail failure incidents, the Government will furnish electronic data files (such as PDFs) related to those incidents. 6. Deliverables and Delivery Dates The overall period of performance includes a 1-year base period and two 1-year option periods. The Contractor must deliver a total of four 1-hour presentations per year. Table 1. Description of Deliverables (See attached Table for CLINs and description of deliverables) 7. Acceptance Criteria The Government wil

Who won similar work

21 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Match: Same agency (Transportation (all)), same NAICS 541330.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
NOBLIS, INC.1$709.1MDec 2, 2024
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION · $SAIC1$629.8MJul 10, 2025
EVANS INCORPORATED1$212.5MOct 28, 2024
CHANGEIS, INC.1$114.7MDec 2, 2024
CHEROKEE STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS, L.L.C.1$69.4MMay 27, 2025
ROCKSOL CONSULTING GROUP, INC.1$60.0MAug 6, 2025
RS&H, Inc.1$60.0MAug 6, 2025
P17 SOLUTIONS LLC1$53.7MDec 9, 2024
AURORA INNOVATIONS, LLC1$38.0MDec 9, 2024
QUALITY ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS INC1$18.5MDec 23, 2024

Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in.

Latest awards

Competitive landscape

For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 1 of these past winners lobbied Transportation, Dept of (DOT) since 2024 (5 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Transportation, Dept of (DOT) job
  • $58K from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 1218 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards.

  • 1 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 1 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.