Loading the records…
Loading the records…
Air Force and Space Force · FA8214 AFNWC PZBB
Air Force and Space Force is planning to buy "Propulsion System Rocket Engine (PSRE) Transport Trailer 2 (PTT2)". This is an early notice: it is not taking bids yet. The work is in Hill AFB, UT, USA. The original due date (Oct 15, 2025) has passed; check the latest amendment for the current one. In the last 2 years, similar work went to 8 companies, usually for about $105K per award. An award could come any day: the usual time to award has passed.
Put together from the facts on this page; the details and sources are below.
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Every notice posted under solicitation FA8214PTT2 in this department, oldest first.
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
e, and knowledge required to successfully complete this effort for the PTT2 effort and is not to be construed as a solicitation. The issuance of this RFI and responses thereto do not imply a commitment to release a solicitation. A determination by the Government not to compete any or all portions of the work discussed in this RFI rests solely within the discretion of the Government. The Government will not pay for time, effort, materials, or any other costs that arise as a consequence of responding or providing information related to this RFI. The purpose of this Sources Sought Synopsis is to conduct market research to determine if responsible sources exist and if this effort can be competitive and/or a total Small Business Set-Aside. The proposed North American Industry Classification Systems (NAICS) Code is intended to be 336212 or 333924 which have a corresponding size standard of 1,000 and 900 or fewer employees respectively. The Government will use this information to determine the best acquisition strategy for this procurement. The Government is interested in all small business, to include 8(a), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned, historically underutilized business zone (Hubzone), and Women-Owned small business concerns. The Government is actively conducting market research to identify potential Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) or Non-Developmental Item (NDI) solutions for the transport trailers. A key objective of this market research is to determine the feasibility of leveraging existing commercial capabilities to meet the program's requirements. Should viable commercial solutions be identified that fully satisfy the stringent performance, security, safety, and reliability specifications inherent to nuclear weapons operations, it is the Government's intent to pursue a commercially available approach to the maximum extent practicable. BACKGROUND: The Air Force�s (AF) fleet of PTT must support the MMIII LGM-30G ICBM until the end of its operational life. However, the existing challenge of parts obsolescence poses a significant obstacle to providing seamless support. Additionally, a scarcity of spare parts, some entirely unobtainable, coupled with substantial engineering updates required by the Technical Data Package (TDP), further complicates the situation. Given these considerations, the AF aims to develop a new design, create a new TDP, and ultimately increase the PTT fleet. Procurement of five PTT2, including one to two PTT2 during the Engineering, Manufacturing, and Development (EMD) phase, will be required. During Production, the AF expects to procure the remaining three or four PTT2s for a total of five. PTT DESCRIPTION: The PTT is a trailer that provides protection and transportation of PSREs housed within a PSRE Shipping Container. The PTT is used to transport the PSRE(s) to various storage and operational locations. The PTT provides a transportation platform that limits excessive shock and vibration to the PSRE assembly. It also provides a temperature-controlled environment designed to keep the PSRE within its required temperature range during transportation. The Environmental Control Unit (ECU) provides the required temperature control by use of an on-board diesel fueled generator and a closed loop Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) unit. INFORMATION SOUGHT: Contracting If contractor has received Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) ratings, for the NAICS Code(s) listed or similar, of Marginal or below in the last 5 years explain what has/will be implemented to facilitate Very Good or Exceptional ratings going forward. For each CPAR rating, please provide the associated contract number. For contracts your company has performed with the Government for development or design of an item, how did the end of contract value compare to the initial value? Was a cost performance index (CPI) figure available from earned value data? For each contract, please provide the associated contract number. IAW DFARS 252.227, please describe the anticipated data rights associated with this effort and explain any rationale for proprietary data. Please provide expected usage of sub-contractors (responsibilities of subcontractor(s), expected percentage of work to sub-contractor(s), etc.), as well as, expected usage percentage of small business sub-contractors. Please confirm the contractor is able to keep, complete, and make available to the Government, records of its inspections related to contract performance (i.e., manufacturing line inspection, certifications of conformance, etc.). How does the contractor identify inefficiencies in personnel (quantity of certified weld inspectors, employee retention, etc.), processes (quality, manufacturing, etc.), or programs? Provide examples. How does the contractor identify areas for improvement in manufacturing processes (e.g., SixSigma processes, +QDIP, etc.)? How long does it take to implement the changes? Provide examples. Please provide examples of experience with inspection to AS9100 or other quality management standards, Government Mandatory Inspection Points (GMIPs), and periodic & sporadic Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA)/government inspections. Systems Engineering Please provide current or previous experience with Air Force engineering and design contracts, as well as Systems Engineering processes. For each contract, please provide the associated contract number. Tractors are not incorporated in this RFI (RFI is for Trailer only). Confirm contractor does not object to solely delivery of trailers and the trailer integration with a standard Tractor, as defined in provided requirement document. Please provide expected timelines for design, development, testing, and production phases EMD phase (1 unit vs 2 units) including: design, manufacturing, and testing. Production (options for 3 or 4 units, tiered pricing, etc.). Technical Documents Within the last 10 years, please provide current or previous experience (and contract numbers) with Semitrailer design and construction. MMIII / ICBM weapons systems. What is your current process for revision control of technical documents? What do you expect to change (if any) for the PTT2 contract? What is your process for validating technical requirements? After allocated baseline is established, what is the process for validating technical changes and documentation for design changes? Please provide level of experience using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) modeling or equivalent analysis to complete structural analysis on semitrailer design. What software are you proficient with? Provide examples of contracts (with contract number) of previous FEA experience. What testing practices has your company implemented on previous semitrailer designs (e.g., shock and vibration, Electromagnetic Interference /Electromagnetic Compatibility/Electromagnetic Pulse, environmental, etc.)? Is it customary for your company to do dry-run testing prior to government customer attending? Does your company have established contracts or previous experiences with test houses that can support test requirements on large assets? Please provide information on shop space and manufacturing facilities (90,000 square foot minimum) to provide context regarding adequate availability and space for full production of the PTT2. Processes/Standards Please provide any standards the contractor is
8 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Air Force and Space Force), same product/service code (PSC) 2330.
Single-winner award sizes (8): middle half $40K to $216K, median $105K; range $16K to $5.0M.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| RENOWN CARGO TRAILERS, LLC | 1 | $5.0M | Aug 27, 2026 |
| ARHAB LLC | 1 | $402K | Mar 26, 2026 |
| Comforts of Home Services, Inc. | 1 | $154K | Jul 9, 2025 |
| BROTHERS BODY AND EQUIPMENT, LLC | 1 | $140K | Apr 15, 2025 |
| Midway Trailers Benton MO 63736 USA | 1 | $71K | Oct 14, 2026 |
| PHOENIX CONTRACTING LLC | 1 | $42K | Jul 16, 2026 |
| IOTA DYNAMICS, LLC | 1 | $33K | Jul 11, 2025 |
| WILLIAM PHELAN Commack NY 11725 USA | 1 | $16K | Apr 27, 2026 |
Value counts new single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling (same contract, or the same office, day and amount); that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Contract modifications are not new awards and are not added in either. Notices whose amount is a placeholder such as $999,999,999 are not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings.
For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name, including the subsidiaries a company lists in its SEC filings. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.