Special NoticePosted Oct 13, 2026·Responses due Oct 30, 2026

OVERHAUL AND REPAIR OF SPG-62 ANTENNA AND MK82 GUN AND GUIDED MISSLE DIRECTOR

NAVSEA, naval shipyards and surface/undersea warfare centers · NSWC CRANE

Stage
Early notice (sources sought, presolicitation or special notice)
NAICS
334511
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
N0016427SNB01
Set-aside
None stated
PSC
J020
Place
Not stated
Contact
Jennifer Madison (jennifer.n.madison.civ@us.navy.mil)
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation N0016427SNB01 in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
  • Oct 13, 2026 · this notice
    Special Notice
Solicitation
None posted
Award
Not yet. Typical award: Feb 4, 2027 to Sep 26, 2027, middle of the range Apr 26, 2027.
Measured from 53 past early notices at Dept of the Navy with NAICS 334511 that later posted an award (middle half of cases, counted from Oct 13, 2026).

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
  • Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
  • Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.

What the notice says

The Government is issuing this Sources Sought announcement as a part of market research for the MK-99 Fire Control System (FCS) Program. SPECIAL NOTICE � SOURCES SOUGHT � Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC), Crane Division, is conducting market research seeking industry inputs and interest for the overhaul and repair of the MK81 Director Group�s SPG-62 antenna and MK82 gun and guided missile director and intends to award a 5-year, firm fixed price, competitive IDIQ follow-on contract to N0016424DWP09. Companies with the capability and facilities to provide these types of supplies and services … (show all)

as well as the experience/expertise are invited to submit information pertaining to their capability to fulfill this requirement as requested below. All interested parties may submit company and product literature, a capability statement no longer than 10 [JM1] [MA2] pages, and/or other pertinent information. Cover Sheet, Company Profile, and List of Abbreviations and Acronyms are exempt from the page limit. A detailed proposal is not requested. Responses should indicate sufficient detail for assessment of potential design architecture, strategies and company interest; submissions should be organized as follows: 1. Cover Sheet: Sources Sought number, company name, company address, technical point of contact with the individual�s name, title, email address, telephone number, and date 2. General response information: Are you a Small Business in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations and the identified North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)? If yes, please indicate your designations (i.e. HUBZone, Veteran Owned, Woman Owned, etc.) Please see attached draft statement of work (SOW) for overview of requirements. Responses should, at a minimum, address the following questions: Describe your experience in providing overhaul to relevant top-side radar systems as identified in the SOW. Briefly describe your experience with parts management and inventory control. Include how you ensure parts are protected from pilfering and from being damaged during assembly and shipping. Briefly describe your experience with repairing items identified during post blasting as repairable not beyond economical repair (BER). Also explain your experience in manufacturing parts to replace BER components. Even though the SOW requires the Government to be informed of any process or part changes, your suppliers may change processes without notifying you. What testing and/or monitoring would you perform to ensure products delivered to the Government continue to meet specified requirements throughout contract execution? Can you meet all requirements contained in the SOW through your own company and/or the use of suppliers/subcontractors/teaming partners? How would suppliers/subcontractors/teaming partners be used? Due to the size of these radars the Government would be providing, do you have the necessary facility/warehousing capabilities? Please specifically address the hook height, paint facilities, square footage and facility location. If you identify an issue, how would you propose to mitigate it? Specify whether your facility currently holds Society for Protective Coatings (SSPC) Quality Procedure-1 (QP-1) or QP-3 qualifications and confirm full capability to comply with NAVSEA Naval Ships� Technical Manual (NSTM) Chapter 631, Section 11, and NAVSEA Standard Item 009-32. If your organization lacks these internal qualifications, would you outsource? How do would you mitigate risks to the delivery schedule and manage asset transportation to and from sub-tier vendors? Please describe your organization�s methodology and system for tracking, managing and reporting on Government Furnished Equipment (GFE). Describe your organization's experience in transporting systems of similar size and scope, including your overall strategy for mitigating transit risks to the assets. If your approach involves outsourcing transportation to a third party, detail how your organization will manage the subcontractor to prevent schedule delays and maintain asset security. Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) for this contract is Level 2 (Self) Certification. Is your company�s quality program certified to ISO 9001-2015? If your quality program is not ISO certified, does your quality system meet the following requirements: monitor and control critical processes, continuously improving processes, establish mechanisms for performance feedback and maintain an effective root cause analysis and corrective action system? Review the draft SOW. Identify any requirements which add risk or unnecessary cost to the effort. Provide recommendations for improvement to meet Government requirements in the most cost-effective manner. Provide amplifying information or clarification of any other requirements to support this RFI. Responders may identify Government customers and/or industry customers for whom they have provided radar repair services. Responders may include any information explaining why they are fully capable of meeting all requirements for repair services in support of MK99. 3. List of abbreviations and acronyms 4. Product line brochures, catalog excerpts, etc. may be submitted and referenced within the general capability statement and are exempt from the page limit. Respondents are solely responsible for properly marking and clearly identifying any proprietary information or trade secrets contained within their responses. The Government will not be liable, or suffer any consequential damages, for any proprietary information not properly marked and clearly identified. Proprietary information received in response to this RFI will be safeguarded and handled in accordance with applicable Government regulations. Contractors must be properly registered and active in the System for Award Management (SAM) and the Joint Certification Program (JCP) in order to receive the controlled attachments. Offerors may obtain information on SAM registration and annual confirmation requirements by calling 866-606-8220 or via https://sam.gov. Information about the JCP is located at https://www.dla.mil/logistics-operations/services/joint-certification-program/. The controlled attachments will be posted with this sources sought special notice. All changes to the requirement that occur prior to the closing date will be posted to Contract Opportunities on https://sam.gov/. It is the responsibility of interested vendors to monitor https://sam.gov/ for any amendments, which may be issued to this solicitation. For changes made after the closing date, only those offerors that provide a quote will be provided any changes/amendments and considered for future discussions and/or award. At current time, no funding is available for contractual estimates. This RFI/sources sought does not constitute an Invitation for Bids (IFB), a Request for Quote (RFQ), or a Request for Proposal (RFP) and should not be construed as a commitment of any kind by the government to issue a formal solicitation or ultimately award a contract. The US Government is in no way liable to pay for or reimburse any companies or entities that respond to this announcement. Any costs incurred by interested companies in response to this announcement will NOT be reimbursed. NSWC Crane will accept only electronic unclassified submission of responses. All responses must be submitted to the Points of Contact (POC) any time prior to the expiration of this announcement. The POCs for this effort are Jennifer Madison, Code 0212 via email jennifer.n.madison.civ@us.navy.mil. Please copy Marisa Smith, marisa.l.smith11.civ@us.navy.mil and Dalton Murdock, dalton.j.murdock.civ@us.navy.mil. The mailing address is: Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division (NSWC Crane) Code 0212, Bldg. 3373 300 Highway 361 Crane, IN 47522-5001 Reference announcement number N0016427SNB01 in all correspondence and communications.

Who won similar work

29 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Match: Same office, same NAICS 334511.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION · $NOC5$486.5MOct 9, 2026
Raytheon Company · $RTX5$205.8MSep 15, 2025
BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc.3$254.1MOct 8, 2026
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION · $LMT2$297.0MSep 9, 2026
L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · $LHX2$26.3MOct 5, 2026
PROGRAMS MANAGEMENT ANALYTICS & TECHNOLOGIES INC1$89.0MDec 16, 2025
Northrup Grumman Systems Corporation1$65.2MAug 28, 2025
HIGH BRIDGE SOLUTIONS, LLC1$43.0MDec 17, 2024
MSI DEFENCE SYSTEMS US, LLC1$29.3MAug 25, 2025
POLARITY INC.1$7.5MJul 8, 2026

Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in.

Latest awards

Competitive landscape

For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 2 of these past winners lobbied Navy, Dept of or U.S. Marines since 2024 (25 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Navy, Dept of or U.S. Marines job
  • $1.4M from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Armed Services, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Armed Services
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 8 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards.

  • 4 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 6 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.