DA10--Oracle Retail and Store Inventory Management (SIM) SaaS Migration (VA-27-00003431)
Veterans Affairs · TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION CENTER NJ (36C10B)
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation 36C10B26Q0663 in this department, oldest first.
- Jul 17, 2026 · this noticeSources Sought
- Sep 1, 2026Sources SoughtOpen
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
- Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
- Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.
What the notice says
Request for Information Oracle Retail MFCS and SIOCS Cloud Service Migration VA-27-00003431 Introduction This RFI is for planning purposes only and shall not be considered an Invitation for Bid, Request for Task Execution Plan, Request for Quotation or a Request for Proposal. Additionally, there is no obligation on the part of the Government to acquire any products or services described in this RFI. Your response to this RFI will be treated only as information for the Government to consider. You will not be entitled to payment for direct or indirect costs that you incur in responding to this R… (show all)
FI. This request does not constitute a solicitation for proposals or the authority to enter into negotiations to award a contract. No funds have been authorized, appropriated or received for this effort. The information provided may be used by the VA in developing its acquisition strategy and PWS. Interested parties are responsible for adequately marking proprietary, restricted or competition sensitive information contained in their response. The Government does not intend to pay for the information submitted in response to this RFI. Be advised that set-aside decisions may be made based on the information provided in response to this RFI. Responses should be as complete and informative as possible. 2. Submittal Information: All responsible sources may submit a response in accordance with the information below. There is a page limitation for this RFI of 15 pages. The Government will not review any other information or attachments included, that are in excess of the 15 page limit. NO MARKETING MATERIALS ARE ALLOWED AS PART OF THIS RFI. Interested Contractors shall at a minimum, provide the following information in the initial paragraph of the submission: Name of Company Address Point of Contact Phone Number Fax Number Email address Company Business Size and Status For VOSB and SDVOSBs, proof of verification in the Vendor Information Pages (VIP). NAICS code(s) Socioeconomic data Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Number Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number Existing Contractual Vehicles (GWAC, FSS, or MAC) Provide a summary of your capability to meet the requirements contained within the draft PD for the following areas: 1. Corporate Experience Describe your organization's experience implementing or migrating Oracle Retail Cloud solutions during the past five (5) years, including the Oracle Retail products implemented, customer type (Federal or Commercial), project size, and scope. 2. Relevant Oracle Retail Migration Experience Provide up to three (3) projects that demonstrate your experience migrating Oracle Retail RMS to MFCS and/or SIM to SIOCS. Include the customer, period of performance, scope, and project outcomes. 3. Technical Migration Experience Describe your experience performing Oracle Retail Cloud migrations, including data migration, application configuration, integration development, testing, cutover, and post-go-live support. 4. Enterprise Integration Experience Describe your experience integrating Oracle Retail Cloud solutions with enterprise systems such as ERP, financial systems, POS, EDI, identity management, and reporting platforms. Identify the primary integration technologies used. 5. Implementation Methodology Summarize your Oracle Retail Cloud implementation methodology, including project planning, solution design, testing, deployment, hypercare, and transition to sustainment. 6. Federal and Security Experience Describe your experience implementing enterprise cloud solutions for Federal agencies, including support for NIST RMF, ATO, identity and access management, Zero Trust, and other applicable cybersecurity requirements. 7. Organizational Capability and Key Personnel Describe your organization's capacity to support a nationwide Oracle Retail Cloud migration and the qualifications of the key personnel who would perform this effort. 8. Oracle Partnership and Qualifications Describe your organization's Oracle partnership status, Oracle Retail certifications, product specializations, and access to Oracle Retail subject matter experts. 9. Industry Feedback Provide any recommendations regarding the draft PWS, acquisition strategy, contract structure, performance period, or other considerations that would improve competition and successful contract execution. NOTE: Technical questions may be submitted as part of your response, however, questions directed to the customer are prohibited. Small businesses should also include information as to: Your company s intent and ability to meet the set aside requirement in accordance with VAAR 852.219-10 (JUL 2016) (DEVIATION) VA Notice of Total SDVOSB and 13 CFR §125.6, which states the contractor will not pay more than 50 percent of the amount paid by the Government to it to firms that are not SDVOSBs. Your response shall include information as to available personnel and financial resources; full names of proposed team members and the PWS requirements planned to be subcontracted to them, which must include the prime planned percentage or the names of the potential team members that may be used to fulfill the set aside requirement. Has the draft PWS provided sufficient detail to describe the technical requirements that encompass the software development and production operations support services to be performed under this effort. ______ YES ______ NO (if No, answer question c) If NO , please provide your technical comments/recommendations on elements of the draft PWS that may contribute to a more accurate proposal submission and efficient, cost effective effort. Please email to Sean Doyle, Contract Specialist at Sean.Doyle@va.gov and Evan Schlisserman, Contracting Officer at Evan.Schlisserman@va.gov@va.gov. Please note RFI VA-27-00003431 Oracle Retail MFCS and SIOCS Cloud Service Migration in the subject line of your response. Mark your response as Proprietary Information if the information is considered business sensitive. The email file size shall not exceed 5 MB.
Who won similar work
4 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same office (TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION CENTER NJ (36C10B)), same product/service code (PSC) DA10 and NAICS 541512.
Single-winner award sizes (4): middle half $2.5M to $101.0M, median $4.7M; range $357K to $385.4M.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. · $PLTR · $6.2B | 1 | $385.4M | Oct 9, 2025 |
| TAYLOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC. | 1 | $6.2M | Aug 26, 2025 |
| PERATON INC. | 1 | $3.2M | May 19, 2025 |
| VISUAL TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK LLC | 1 | $357K | Mar 3, 2026 |
Value counts new single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling (same contract, or the same office, day and amount); that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Contract modifications are not new awards and are not added in either. Notices whose amount is a placeholder such as $999,999,999 are not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings.
- $PLTR reported $6.2B revenue (12 months to Jun 30, 2026). The median single-winner award in these 4 past awards, $4.7M, is under 0.1% of that. SEC filing
One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.
- Mar 3, 2026VISUAL TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK LLC$357KISI Annual Maintenance and SupportNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Oct 9, 2025PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.$385.4MDA10--VA-25-00023144 - National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics Platform - SaaS Solution (New Requirement)Materiality: 6.3% of $PLTR revenue (High) SEC
- Aug 26, 2025TAYLOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.$6.2MDA10--Brand Name or Equal iMedConsent Web Solution Commercial-Off- The-Shelf, COTS, Cloud-Based Signature Software Application, Maintenance and Support, and TrainingNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- May 19, 2025PERATON INC.$3.2MDA10--CORP: Enterprise Performance Management System (EPMS) - New Task Order (VA-25-00013231)No listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
Materiality: one award's value as a share of the winner's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings (or its last fiscal year, as noted when you point at it). Low under 1%, Medium 1 to 5%, High 5% or more. Many awards are paid over several years, so this overstates a single year's share.
Competitive landscape
For the 4 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 1 of these past winners lobbied Veterans Affairs, Dept of (VA) since 2024 (5 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Veterans Affairs, Dept of (VA) job
- $11K from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 25 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
- 1 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 12 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name, including the subsidiaries a company lists in its SEC filings. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.