RFI: Targetry Range Automated Control and Recording II (TRACR II) Software
Army Contracting Command (ACC) · W6QK ACC-APG-ORLANDO
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation W900KK26RPTTS in this department, oldest first.
- Aug 13, 2026Sources SoughtOpen
- Aug 13, 2026 · this noticeSources Sought
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
- Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
- Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.
What the notice says
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING RANGE CONNECTIVITY PURPOSE: Product Manager Tactical Training System (PdM TTS) is requesting information from interested offerors regarding a technical challenge regarding data transfer between two networks. BACKGROUND: PdM TTS is responsible for supporting ranges that utilize the Targetry Range Automated Control and Recording II (TRACR II) software. This software is responsible for operating range targetry and collecting scoring data. The current Authority To Operate (ATO) that exists on these ranges prohibits external connect… (show all)
ions and the system operates fully independent of any external communications to any network. Successful transfer of this data from the existing closed network to a separate, cloud-based database requires operators to manually record data into logbooks and then re-enter it on a separate computer network. Note: data is unclassified. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (Technical): PDM TTS is requesting information on the most efficient way for this data to be successfully transferred between these two networks. Data transfer can be either uni-directional or bi-directional between the networks. Points to consider when creating a solution should include what type of data would be sent, what modifications would be required to the existing hardware and software configuration, how this solution would be implemented, utilized, and documented, and what impacts this solution would have on the existing ATO. COMPANY PROFILE: To assist the Government in determining if this can be set aside for small businesses, please provide the following administrative information: � Company Name, CAGE Code, and UEI Number. � Point of Contact (Name, Phone, Email). � Business Size Standard and Socio-Economic Status (e.g., Small Business, 8(a), HUBZone, SDVOSB, WOSB) under NAICS Code: 541512 for Computer Systems Design or 541511 for Custom Computer Programming). � A brief summary of your company�s experience implementing similar cross-network data transfer solutions in DoD or highly regulated environments. SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS: The Government is exploring a range of acquisition strategies and plans to utilize the information gained from this White Paper to help further shape the acquisition strategy. Responses should be limited to a five (5) page max white paper, not including cover page, cover letter, table of contents and any other documentation submitted in response to Past Performance. Any proprietary concepts of information should be clearly identified as such. Submitted data and information will not be returned. Any information submitted in response to this RFI Notice is strictly voluntary. This notice is for information and planning purposes. The Government will not pay or otherwise reimburse respondents for information submitted. Industry is encouraged to suggest alternative NAICS codes that may better align with the requirements. Disclaimer: This notice does not constitute an invitation for bids or a request for proposal and is not a commitment by the U.S. Government to procure subject products or services nor will the Government reimburse any parties for costs associated with this request. The Government will use the information received to forge its acquisition strategy. Additionally, all submissions become Government property and will not be returned. No basis for a claim against the Government shall arise as a result from a response to this RFI.
Who won similar work
12 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Army Contracting Command (ACC)), same product/service code (PSC) R425.
Single-winner award sizes (12): middle half $905K to $57.4M, median $17.3M; range $46K to $347.5M.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| DRS NETWORK & IMAGING SYSTEMS LLC · $DRS · $2.8B | 2 | $110.8M | Jul 27, 2026 |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation · $LMT · $67.6B | 1 | $347.5M | Jul 27, 2026 |
| INTUITIVE RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION | 1 | $99.3M | Jun 4, 2026 |
| VIGOR WORKS LLC | 1 | $62.4M | Sep 5, 2025 |
| NASH HARBOR SOLUTIONS, LLC | 1 | $30.8M | Jan 29, 2026 |
| Dalcom, LLC | 1 | $3.9M | Apr 27, 2026 |
| VISILTY CONSULTANTS LLC | 1 | $3.0M | Nov 22, 2024 |
| SHUBHAM CHANDRA Katy TX 77494 USA | 1 | $986K | Aug 26, 2026 |
| Vectrus Systems LLC | 1 | $661K | Feb 24, 2025 |
| VITELLI PAUL Wrentham MA 02093 USA | 1 | $578K | Aug 31, 2026 |
Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.
- $DRS reported $2.8B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 12 past awards, $17.3M, is 0.6% of that. 10-K
- $LMT reported $67.6B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 12 past awards, $17.3M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K
One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.
- Aug 31, 2026VITELLI PAUL Wrentham MA 02093 USA$578KEngineering Technician Services to JFET
- Aug 26, 2026SHUBHAM CHANDRA Katy TX 77494 USA$986KSenior Engineering Services
- Jul 27, 2026DRS NETWORK & IMAGING SYSTEMS LLC$55.7MFiscal Years 2027-2029 Improved Bradley Acquisition Subsystem (IBAS) Engineering Services
- Jul 27, 2026Lockheed Martin Corporation$347.5MMissile Segment Enhancement (MSE) Containerized Launcher (CL) and Remote Interceptor Guidance 360 Degrees (RIG-360) Containerized System (CS) Phase 2 Program
- Jun 4, 2026INTUITIVE RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION$99.3MLimited Source Justification
- Apr 27, 2026Dalcom, LLC$3.9MSYNOPSIS OF AWARD: W911QX-26-C-A009/Ballistic Research Laboratory-Computer Aided Design (BRL-CAD) Software Development Support Services
- Jan 29, 2026NASH HARBOR SOLUTIONS, LLC$30.8MSYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (SETA) SUPPORT FOR PRODUCT LEAD � ENTERPRISE, IDENTITY, CREDENTIAL AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT (E-ICAM)
- Sep 15, 2025DIT-MCO International LLC$46KDIT-MCO Equipment Training
- Sep 5, 2025VIGOR WORKS LLC$62.4MManeuver Support Vessel � Light (MSV(L)) System Technical Support (STS)
- Feb 24, 2025Vectrus Systems LLC$661KSynopsis of Award: Configuration Management (CM), Data Management (DM), and Engineering Technical Support
Competitive landscape
For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 1 of these past winners lobbied Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers) or Army, Dept of (Other) or Natl Guard since 2024 (7 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers) or Army, Dept of (Other) or Natl Guard job
- $412K from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Armed Services, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Armed Services
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 8 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
- 2 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 4 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.