Special NoticePosted Sep 16, 2026·Responses due Oct 1, 2026

MTCCS II Ceiling Increase

Army Contracting Command (ACC) · W6QK ACC-APG-ORLANDO

Stage
Early notice (sources sought, presolicitation or special notice)
NAICS
541990
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
W900KK26MTCCSII
Set-aside
No Set aside used
PSC
R425
Place
Orlando, FL, USA
Contact
Guillermo J. Santiago Sosa (guillermo.j.santiagososa.civ@army.mil)
Loading your pipeline and notes…
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation W900KK26MTCCSII in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
  • Sep 16, 2026 · this notice
    Special Notice
Solicitation
None posted
Award
Not yet. Typical award: Oct 28, 2026 to Nov 11, 2026, middle of the range Nov 5, 2026.
Measured from 11 past early notices at Dept of the Army with NAICS 541990 that later posted an award (middle half of cases, counted from Sep 16, 2026).

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
  • Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
  • Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.

What the notice says

THIS IS A NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD SOLE SOURCE AND IS NOT A REQUEST FOR COMPETITIVE PROPOSALS. This synopsis is hereby issued in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 5.203 to announce the Government's intent to increase the programmatic ordering ceiling of the Mission Training Complex Capability Support (MTCCS) II, Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC), by $129M on a noncompetitive basis. Services under this MATOC encompass non-personal operational, technical, administrative, and program management services supporting individual through collective MC training. The ce… (show all)

iling increase applies across the existing MTCCS II MATOC suite comprising the following base contracts: Base Contract Contractor W900KK-24-D-0003 Booz Allen Hamilton Inc W900KK-24-D-0004 CSA Global LLC W900KK-24-D-0005 General Dynamics Information Technology W900KK-24-D-0006 Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation W900KK-24-D-0007 Phoenix Logistics LLC W900KK-24-D-0008 Valiant Global Defense Services Inc. W900KK-24-D-0009 Applied Training Solutions LLC W900KK-24-D-0010 Core Government Services Corporation W900KK-24-D-0015 Veteran's First LLC W900KK-24-D-0014 Nemean Trideum Joint Venture LLC W900KK24D0012 Evocati Solutions JV W900KK24D0013 Liberty Business Solutions W900KK24D0020 Thalin W900KK24D0022 Gemini Technical Services The Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground Orlando Division (ACC-APG-ORL) and the U.S Army Combined Arms Center have identified a critical need to increase the MTCCS II MATOC cumulative ceiling to ensure uninterrupted execution of the Army�s Mission Training Command (MTC) Program. The contemplated $129M ceiling increase is necessitated by environmental landscape changes and operational training demands, guaranteeing the continuation of vital Mission Command (MC) training delivered to units throughout the Army. Due to the ongoing operational tempo and specialized scope of work, no other contractors are currently positioned to assemble and mobilize the required administrative infrastructure, program management, and subject matter experts without creating an unacceptable mission lapse. Awarding the requirement to any sources other than the established MTCCS II contract holders would cause significant disruption of ongoing mission-critical training services. This is not a request for competitive quotes. The Government intends to award a sole source action to increase the MTCCS II contract ceilings under statutory authority 10 U.S.C. 3204(a)(1) as set forth in FAR 6.302-1 Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements. Interested firms that believe they possess the capabilities to satisfy the requirement may submit a written capability statement. Responding contractors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) at sam.gov. All responses must be submitted no later than the Response Date and Time identified above. Email responses directly to the Contract Specialist, Guillermo Santiago-Sosa, at Guillermo.j.santiagososa.civ@army.mil. A determination by the Government not to compete this proposed contract action based upon responses received to this notice is solely within the discretion of the Government. Information received will normally be considered solely for the purpose of determining whether to conduct a competitive procurement in the future. Telephone inquiries will not be accepted.

Who won similar work

12 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Army Contracting Command (ACC)), same product/service code (PSC) R425.

Single-winner award sizes (12): middle half $905K to $57.4M, median $17.3M; range $46K to $347.5M.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
DRS NETWORK & IMAGING SYSTEMS LLC · $DRS · $2.8B2$110.8MJul 27, 2026
Lockheed Martin Corporation · $LMT · $67.6B1$347.5MJul 27, 2026
INTUITIVE RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION1$99.3MJun 4, 2026
VIGOR WORKS LLC1$62.4MSep 5, 2025
NASH HARBOR SOLUTIONS, LLC1$30.8MJan 29, 2026
Dalcom, LLC1$3.9MApr 27, 2026
VISILTY CONSULTANTS LLC1$3.0MNov 22, 2024
SHUBHAM CHANDRA Katy TX 77494 USA1$986KAug 26, 2026
Vectrus Systems LLC1$661KFeb 24, 2025
VITELLI PAUL Wrentham MA 02093 USA1$578KAug 31, 2026

Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.

Investor context
  • $DRS reported $2.8B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 12 past awards, $17.3M, is 0.6% of that. 10-K
  • $LMT reported $67.6B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 12 past awards, $17.3M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K

One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.

Latest awards

Materiality: one award's value as a share of the winner's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings (or its last fiscal year, as noted when you point at it). Low under 1%, Medium 1 to 5%, High 5% or more. Many awards are paid over several years, so this overstates a single year's share.

Competitive landscape

For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 1 of these past winners lobbied Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers) or Army, Dept of (Other) or Natl Guard since 2024 (7 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers) or Army, Dept of (Other) or Natl Guard job
  • $412K from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Armed Services, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Armed Services
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 8 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.

  • 2 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 4 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.