Special NoticePosted Sep 30, 2026·Responses due Mar 27, 2027

Planning Guidelines and Design Standards (PGDS) Version 9.0 for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems

TSA · WORKFORCE & ENTERPRISE OPERATIONS

Stage
Early notice (sources sought, presolicitation or special notice)
NAICS
488190
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
TSA25-04-03026
Set-aside
None stated
PSC
C1BE
Place
Not stated
Contact
Jason Richards (jason.richards@tsa.dhs.gov)
Loading your pipeline and notes…
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation TSA25-04-03026 in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
  • Sep 30, 2026
    Special Notice
    Open
  • Sep 30, 2026 · this notice
    Special Notice
Solicitation
None posted
Award
Not yet. Too few past cases at this agency to estimate timing (1 found; 10 needed).

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
  • Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
  • Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.

What the notice says

September 30, 2026 The purpose of this amendment is to provide the �Planning Guidelines and Design Standards for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems Version 9.0� (PGDS v9.0), which hereby replaces Version 8.0. The PGDS provides requirements and best practices to assist designers, planners, architects, and other stakeholders in developing efficient and cost-effective checked baggage screening systems. PGDS v9.0 is provided as a single document containing the main body and appendices. This amendment also includes an industry comment form. To submit comments regarding PGDS v9.0 or propose changes … (show all)

for a future version of the PGDS, please complete the comment form according to the instructions provided in its first tab. The comment period closes on March 31, 2027, after which TSA will review and adjudicate all comments received for potential inclusion in a future PGDS update. Lastly, this amendment provides the �TSA Electronic Baggage Screening Program Funding of Checked Baggage Inspection System Project Costs Version 8.0� (CBIS Funding Policy Memo v8.0), which hereby replaces Version 7.0. The policy memo describes eligibility for TSA funding, the Other Transaction Agreement application and project-delivery processes, and the allowable, allocable, reasonable, and unallowable costs associated with in-line CBIS projects. It also establishes funding responsibilities for several types of stand-alone Explosive Detection System projects. The PGDS v9.0, PGDS v9.0 Comment Form, and CBIS Funding Policy Memo v8.0 are provided in the attachments. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- January 16, 2025 The purpose of this amendment is to provide the Electronic Baggage Screening Program (EBSP) TSA Funding of Checked Baggage Inspection System (CBIS) Project Costs, Version 7.0 which hereby replaces Version 6.0. This document contains CBIS project and funding application eligibility. This TSA Funding Policy Memo Version 7.0 is provided in the attachments. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- March 24, 2023 The purpose of this amendment is to provide the �Planning Guidelines and Design Standards for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems version 8.0� (PGDS v8.0), which hereby replaces version 7.0. The PGDS is intended to provide standards and best practices that assist designers, planners, and architects in developing efficient and cost-effective in-line checked baggage screening systems. Due to document length and file size considerations, PGDS v8.0 has also been split into two documents � one containing the main body of the document and the other containing appendices. This amendment also provides the document titled �Electronic Baggage Screening Program TSA Funding of Checked Baggage Inspection System Project Costs Version 6.0� (CBIS Funding Policy Memo v6.0), which hereby replaces Version 5.0. This document contains information related to Checked Baggage Inspection System project types, costs that are allocable or non-allocable for TSA reimbursement, and new guidance regarding funding responsibilities for stand-alone baggage screening projects. This amendment also includes an industry comment form. For any comments regarding the contents of PGDS v8.0, or proposed changes to be implemented in a future version of PGDS, please fill out the comment form using the instructions provided in the first tab of this document. The comment period closes on October 31, 2023, after which all received comments will be reviewed and adjudicated by the TSA Technical Review Committee for potential inclusion in PGDS v9.0. The PGDS v8.0 documents, CBIS Funding Policy Memo v6.0, and the industry comments form are provided in the attachments. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- November 19, 2021 The purpose of this amendment is to provide the Electronic Baggage Screening Program (EBSP) TSA Funding of Checked Baggage Inspection System (CBIS) Project Costs, Version 5.0 which hereby replaces Version 4.0. This document contains CBIS project and funding application eligibility. The TSA Funding Policy Memo Version 5.0, is provided in the attachments.

Who won similar work

11 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (TSA), any industry: a loose match.

Loose match: same agency, any industry. Read the titles before treating these as competitors.

Single-winner award sizes (11): middle half $129K to $18.9M, median $1.1M; range $38K to $2.6B.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
Leidos, Inc · $LDOS · $15.3B2$3.3BSep 30, 2026
Rohde & Schwarz USA, Inc.1$23.3MNov 17, 2025
NORTH BELT OFFICE CENTER, LLC1$14.5MNov 25, 2025
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC · $A · $6.8B1$7.5MDec 1, 2025
GLOBAL SUPPLY MANAGEMENT INC1$1.1MSep 17, 2025
DS GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS CORP1$210KDec 1, 2025
CHARPIE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.1$207KOct 7, 2026
TS GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS. LLC1$51KSep 5, 2025
MIKE'S ELECTRIC, INC.1$47KOct 1, 2026
DSA DETECTION LLC1$38KOct 1, 2026

Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.

Investor context
  • $LDOS reported $15.3B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 11 past awards, $1.1M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K
  • $A reported $6.8B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 11 past awards, $1.1M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K

One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.

Latest awards

Competitive landscape

For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 1 of these past winners lobbied Transportation Security Administration (TSA) since 2024 (5 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Transportation Security Administration (TSA) job
  • $247K from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Homeland Security, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 2 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.

  • 2 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 3 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.