Distributed Aperture Resilient Terminal System (DARTS)
Army Contracting Command (ACC) · W6QK ACC-APG
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation W56KGU-26-R-0230 in this department, oldest first.
- Aug 31, 2026Sources SoughtOpen
- Aug 31, 2026 · this noticeSources Sought
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
- Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
- Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.
What the notice says
Request For Information (RFI) � Distributed Aperture Resilient Terminal System (DARTS) 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 ORGANIZATION This Request for Information (RFI) is sponsored by Project Manager Integrated Enterprise Network (PM IEN) Product Manager Wideband Enterprise Satellite Systems (PdM WESS) with support from the DEVCOM Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C5ISR) Center. PdM WESS is a U.S. Army office that acquires, fields, and modernizes strategic satellite communications (SATCOM) for the Department of War (DoW). Located at Fort Be… (show all)
lvoir, VA, it provides secure, high-speed global connectivity for the military. 1.2 BACKGROUND & SCOPE Current enterprise satellite communication (SATCOM) terminals rely on large, single-aperture antennas. These large antennas require significant infrastructure, have long timelines for installation, are easily targeted, and often present a single point of failure for the Army SATCOM network. The Army is researching a Distributed Aperture Resilient Terminal System (DARTS) to provide a resilient means to augment enterprise communications with a quickly deployable array of multiple smaller SATCOM antennas. Advances in digital signal processing technology and digital radio frequency (RF) transport have created an emerging commercial market of components with the ability to efficiently divide, combine and transport RF signals to and from multiple antennas. On receive, signal processing technology can enable the coherent combination of signals from multiple distant antennas to form an antenna array that replicates a large antenna�s performance. On transmit, where regulatory challenges don�t make coherent combining practical, commercial components that divide and route RF signals in the digital domain present the opportunity to dynamically assign transmit carriers to constituent apertures and replicate the carrier Effective Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) of a large antenna. While the DARTS capability to augment enterprise antenna performance are key metrics of the system, modern warfare has taught us that system resiliency, redundancy and cost asymmetry will also be distinguishing characteristics of a successful system. Key system metrics in these categories will include: The ability to quickly deploy and easily install at a low replacement cost (i.e. system cost, installation cost, and maintenance cost). Key performance metrics include equivalent RF performance, along with redundancy and graceful degradation resulting from kinetic and electronic attacks. It is encouraged that these architectural trade-offs are explored as part of the white paper response to justify the chosen architecture and systems components within this context. 1.3 OBJECTIVE The Government is seeking information from industry providers capable of developing a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 7 prototype DARTS using existing commercially available components, technologies, and mature solutions. It is requested that this information includes discussion on the chosen system architecture, components, capabilities and system cost. An overall rough order of magnitude (ROM) of the costs to build and demonstrate a TRL 7 prototype system is also requested. 2.0 REQUIREMENTS 2.1 System Architecture and Key Components Describe your proposed solution and key components including function, capabilities, metrics and, if applicable, limitations. Provide/Describe the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of system and key components. Describe the trades that led proposed solution, including the reasoning and assumptions of these trades. 2.1.1 Terminals and Antennas Operational RF frequencies of X-band and Military Ka-band are required. WGS certified terminals are a recommended component of the system. Discuss the terminals and antennas selected for the proposed solution. 2.1.2 Digital Conversion, Signal Processing and IF Connectivity DARTS will be installed at various enterprise sites, the available space, and physical distance between antennas and the operations center will be variable. The terrain and environmental conditions of these sites will be variable as well. Commercially available digital IF and RF technologies offer key components to address these installation challenges. Discuss the analog to digital conversion, digital IF transport, and coherent combining equipment selected for the proposed solution. Provide technical information on components to support your analysis. Specific system metrics of the digital conversion, signal processing and IF connectivity solution include: The efficiency of combining RF inputs from multiple antennas, and how the proposed solution may leverage or interface to the existing and emerging Digital IF architectures and components conforming to the IEEE-ISTO 4900-2021 DIFI Standard. 2.1.3 Control & Monitoring System DARTS will need its own ability to control and monitor signals arriving at the antenna array. This functionality should include the ability to dynamically plan and assign transmit carriers to constituent apertures based on link requirements. Discuss control and monitoring software and equipment selected to support the proposed solution. 2.2 System, Installation and Maintenance Costs Provide a system cost estimate to include a bill of materials (BOM) with costs for each component. Provide an estimate for installation costs. Provide an estimate for maintenance costs. Please list all assumptions for these estimates. 3.0 RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS The response instructions are as follows: Interested parties are requested to respond to this RFI with a white paper. White papers should be in Microsoft Word or PDF format and are not to exceed 15 pages (excluding any compliance matrix if provided). Responses should be submitted to brian.s.townsend6.civ@army.mil or brian.d.mcguire1.civ@army.mil no later than 17:00 EST on 30 September 2026. Marketing materials are not considered a sufficient response to this RFI. Provide detailed technical answers to the questions in Section 2.0. 4.0 DISCLAIMERS The following disclaimers should be noted: This RFI is not a solicitation and does not constitute a commitment, implied or otherwise, that a procurement action will follow. The Government will not be liable for or suffer any consequential damages for any information provided, or for any costs incurred by any respondent to this RFI. All information submitted in response to this announcement is voluntary. The Government will not pay for information requested nor will it compensate any respondent for any cost incurred in developing information provided to the Government.
Who won similar work
33 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Match: Same agency (Army Contracting Command (ACC)), same NAICS 541715.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL Summerville SC 29486 USA | 5 | $45.1M | Jan 8, 2026 |
| ECS FEDERAL, LLC · $ASGN | 2 | $263.3M | Sep 2, 2026 |
| APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. | 2 | $212.0M | Aug 18, 2025 |
| SAVIT CORPORATION | 1 | $467.7M | Feb 5, 2026 |
| BIGELOW FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | 1 | $467.7M | Feb 5, 2026 |
| PIONEERING DECISIVE SOLUTIONS INC | 1 | $467.7M | Feb 5, 2026 |
| PROGSIT LLC | 1 | $467.7M | Feb 5, 2026 |
| LOGISYS TECHNICAL SERVICES INC | 1 | $467.7M | Feb 5, 2026 |
| THE LOCKWOOD GROUP LLC | 1 | $467.7M | Feb 5, 2026 |
| SPAARK Skies LLC | 1 | $467.7M | Feb 5, 2026 |
Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in.
- Sep 2, 2026ECS FEDERAL, LLC$147.8MSecured Unclassified Network (SUNet) System Legacy
- Jul 27, 2026XTREMIS, INC.$46.8MAUGUR SHIELD Electromagnetic Spectrum Applications for Countering Frequency-Agile Unmanned Aerial Systems
- Jul 10, 2026METACOMP TECHNOLOGIES INC$601KSynopsis of Award: Metacomp CFD++ Software Licenses
- Jun 17, 2026IDEAL INNOVATIONS INCORPORATED$72.0MSynopsis of Award: Radio-Frequency (RF) Sensing Through Obscured Media Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Base
- Jun 1, 2026ECS Federal, LLC$115.5MBroad Agency Announcement (BAA) Nautilus for Artificial Intelligence (AI) Research and Development (R&D)
- Apr 30, 2026GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC.$13.8MAbrams Armor R and D Integration
- Feb 5, 2026LOGISYS TECHNICAL SERVICES INC$467.7MOmnibus for Research and Development, Engineering and Support for the DEVCOM AC in the areas of Large Caliber Cannon Engineering Support, Weapons Research Technical Support, System Testing/Diagnostics
- Feb 5, 2026Total Technology, Inc$467.7MOmnibus for Research and Development, Engineering and Support for the DEVCOM AC in the areas of Large Caliber Cannon Engineering Support, Weapons Research Technical Support, System Testing/Diagnostics
- Feb 5, 2026SPAARK Skies LLC$467.7MOmnibus for Research and Development, Engineering and Support for the DEVCOM AC in the areas of Large Caliber Cannon Engineering Support, Weapons Research Technical Support, System Testing/Diagnostics
- Feb 5, 2026BIGELOW FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC$467.7MOmnibus for Research and Development, Engineering and Support for the DEVCOM AC in the areas of Large Caliber Cannon Engineering Support, Weapons Research Technical Support, System Testing/Diagnostics
Competitive landscape
For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 0 of these past winners lobbied Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers) or Army, Dept of (Other) or Natl Guard since 2024 (0 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers) or Army, Dept of (Other) or Natl Guard job
- No corporate PAC money from them to the overseeing committees since 2024
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards.
- 1 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.