Sentinel Program Infrastructure Partnering Program
Army Corps of Engineers · W071 ENDIST SEATTLE
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation JTF-Sentinel-0001 in this department, oldest first.
- Aug 4, 2026 · this noticeSources Sought
- Aug 5, 2026Sources SoughtOpen
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
- Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
- Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.
What the notice says
SOURCES SOUGHT: SENTINEL INFRASTURCTURE PROGRAM COLLABORATIVE PARTNERING Project Title: Sentinel Program Infrastructure Partnering Program NAICS: 541611 Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services Anticipated Agreement Type: Other Transaction (OT) Agreement or FAR Based Contract Sources Sought Questionnaire: Sources Sought Questionnaire [https://forms.osi.apps.mil/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=unZN_HzxUEy5p48xY9J1gjYA_QgyO8xPpg9r3l9DOZtUQUk0NTJHMDlJR1lYWUZJMDE0U1NENTNSMy4u&route=shorturl] NOTICE PURPOSE & PLANNING CONTEXT The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Joint Task Force… (show all)
Castle � Sentinel Program, in coordination with joint program stakeholders, is issuing this Sources Sought Notice to alert specialized organizational development firms, strategic facilitators, and industrial partnering experts to an upcoming collaborative opportunity. This is NOT a formal solicitation. The Sources Sought notice is for planning and market intelligence purposes only. PROGRAM OBJECTIVES & SCOPE The selected partner shall develop and implement a comprehensive, partnering program that engages stakeholders at all levels of execution in support of the U.S. Air Force Sentinel Program Infrastructure. The effort should establish effective partnering frameworks, governance-aligned engagement strategies, and communication protocols that foster collaboration, transparency, and accountability, and sustained stakeholder alignment throughout program execution. Partnering Program Core Objectives: Program Development: Establish and implement a structured partnering framework and recurring engagement cadence to foster a program-wide partnering culture. Integrate partnering activities with the existing Sentinel governance structure to ensure alignment with decision-making processes, reporting requirements, and oversight mechanisms. Define roles, responsibilities, and touchpoints across all organizational levels, and synchronize partnering efforts with program milestones to promote consistency, accountability, and sustained collaboration throughout execution. Multi-Level Stakeholder Alignment: Identify, assess, and define key Sentinel Program Infrastructure stakeholders across all organizations and functional areas to capture primary executing elements, critical assets, and program-specific concerns that will inform partnering program development. Conduct stakeholder mapping to clarify roles, responsibilities, authorities, and interdependencies. Ensure deliberate alignment of stakeholders at each execution tier and across all project phases by establishing clear lines of communication, decision-making pathways, and engagement strategies. Promote integration and unity of effort to support a cohesive, multidisciplinary project team capable of effectively addressing complex program requirements. Active Facilitation: Lead comprehensive facilitation efforts across all organizational levels, including planning, coordinating, and executing partnering workshops, alignment sessions, and strategic interventions. Drive collaboration among stakeholders, resolve conflicts, and reinforce shared objectives to advance program development and ensure sustained alignment throughout execution. Operational Directives: Develop and implement a comprehensive suite of partnering documents that establish clear communication protocols, define appropriate levels of partnering intensity, and standardize engagement across the program. Create a structured issue resolution framework to enable timely identification, escalation, and resolution of challenges. Provide detailed guidance for the development and maintenance of a shared risk register to promote transparency and proactive risk management. Additionally, produce a relationship management plan and Partnering Charter to formalize roles, responsibilities, shared objectives, and behavioral expectations, ensuring alignment and accountability among all stakeholders throughout the program lifecycle. PARTNER CAPABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE (MARKET INTELLIGENCE/RESEARCH) To streamline market intelligence and research, interested firms should respond to the questions below utilizing the online questionnaire. The questionnaire link to submit responses is: Sources Sought Questionnaire Navigating Existing Hierarchies: How does your firm design and implement a partnering framework that integrates seamlessly with established, highly rigid defense acquisition governance structures? Describe the diversity within your approach and when your team regears to address ongoing friction points? Managing Conflicting Commercial Interests: Provide an example of a project where you successfully aligned the competing interests of two massive, distinct industrial entities (e.g., prime hardware vs. construction partners) with a government team who all held competing motivations. What methodology did you use to build a "single-team" culture? Multi-Tiered Integration: How will your team ensure that "partnering principles" successfully cascade down from executive leadership (General Officers/CEOs) to the field-level execution crews working in remote locations? The Partnering Playbook: Describe your process for co-creating a Partnering Playbook with stakeholders rather than delivering a generic, pre-packaged document. How do you measure and enforce compliance with guidelines and dispute-escalation pathways defined in the playbook? Focused Dispute Resolution: Outline a scenario where an active multi-billion-dollar program was facing severe schedule slip due to an active dispute between stakeholders. What strategic partnering intervention did you lead to resolve the issue, and what metrics did you use to track the return of collaborative health? Staffing Composition: What specialized skillsets do your proposed facilitators possess that qualify them to handle high-friction defense discussions? Agile Scaling & Deployment: The Government will issue operational directives and direct you to designated work sites across the Sentinel infrastructure footprint on an as-needed basis. Describe your firm�s capability to rapidly deploy high-caliber facilitators and support resources to multiple geographic locations (e.g., Vandenburg SFB, Hill AFB, Minot AFB, Malmstrom AFB, F.E. Warren AFB) with minimal notice. Does industry have a preferred acquisition structure to dynamically address this scope, such as Other Transaction Authority or FAR based Contract? RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS Firms interested in this opportunity are requested to take the following action: Submit Questionnaire Answers: Complete and submit the digital questionnaire online at the secure Sources Sought Questionnaire. Monitor SAM.gov: Official updates, Q&A, and solicitation files will be published under the designated Reference Document number on SAM.gov. Sources Sought Point of Contact: Jon Nadig Email: Jonathan.M.Nadig@usace.army.mil James Long Email James.M.Long2@usace.army.mil Disclaimer: This sources sought notice does not constitute a Solicitation /Request for Proposals (RFP) or an agreement to award. The Government is not liable for any planning, administrative, or preparation costs incurred by industry in response to this planning notice.
Who won similar work
6 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Match: Same agency (Army Corps of Engineers), same NAICS 541611.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPECPRO-BB&E JV, LLC | 1 | $19.9M | May 2, 2025 |
| HEALTH FACILITY SOLUTIONS COMPANY | 1 | $16.6M | May 2, 2025 |
| VERNADERO GROUP INC | 1 | $13.2M | May 2, 2025 |
| AGEISS INC | 1 | $1000K | Sep 26, 2025 |
| CAPITAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC. | 1 | $260K | Jul 16, 2026 |
| GOVERNMENT AND MILITARY CERTIFICATION SYSTEMS, INC | 1 | $59K | Jan 21, 2025 |
Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in.
- Jul 16, 2026CAPITAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC.$260KExpert Witness Services for analysis of Contractor RBC claims
- Sep 26, 2025AGEISS INC$1000KFacilitated Partnering and Training Services for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Portland District
- May 2, 2025VERNADERO GROUP INC$13.2MProfessional Services IDIQ MATOC Award Notice
- May 2, 2025HEALTH FACILITY SOLUTIONS COMPANY$16.6MProfessional Services IDIQ MATOC Award Notice
- May 2, 2025SPECPRO-BB&E JV, LLC$19.9MProfessional Services IDIQ MATOC Award Notice
- Jan 21, 2025GOVERNMENT AND MILITARY CERTIFICATION SYSTEMS, INC$59KISO 9001:2015 Certification and Surveillance Audits
Competitive landscape
For the 6 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 0 of these past winners lobbied Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers) or Army, Dept of (Other) or Natl Guard since 2024 (0 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers) or Army, Dept of (Other) or Natl Guard job
- No corporate PAC money from them to the overseeing committees since 2024
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards.
- 0 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.