Combined Synopsis/SolicitationPosted Aug 26, 2026·Responses due Aug 31, 2026

Trimax EGW Controls System Integration & Automation Upgrade

Air Force and Space Force · FA9302 AFTC PZZ

Stage
Open solicitation
NAICS
541330
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
FA930226Q0110V2
Set-aside
Small Business Set Aside - Total
PSC
R425
Place
Edwards, CA, USA
Contact
Carmen Barahona (carmen.barahona@us.af.mil)
Loading your pipeline and notes…
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation FA930226Q0110V2 in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
None posted
Solicitation
  • Aug 26, 2026
    Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
    Open
  • Aug 26, 2026 · this notice
    Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
Award
Not yet. Typical award: Sep 26, 2026 to Nov 8, 2026, middle of the range Oct 9, 2026.
Measured from 10 past solicitations at Dept of the Air Force with NAICS 541330 that later posted an award (middle half of cases, counted from Aug 26, 2026).

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Decide bid or no bid before the response deadline.
  • Look at the past winners for likely competitors and teaming partners.
  • Follow the opportunity to hear about amendments and the award.

What the notice says

This is a Combined Synopsis/Solicitation for the acquisition of a Trimax EGW Controls System Integration & Automation Upgrade at Edwards AFB, CA. ***The competition is limited to vendors that are authorized to work on TRIMAX Systems LLC's proprietary PLC/HMI source code*** Please see attached SF 1449 and Statement of Work for further details. (i) This is a solicitation for commercial services prepared in accordance with the format in RFO 5.201(c), as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; quotes are being requested… (show all)

and a written solicitation will not be issued. The Simplified Acquisition Procedures (RFO 12.201-1) will be used for this requirement. (ii) Solicitation Number: FA930226Q0110V2 **Please provide the full solicitation number on all packages** Offerors may utilize the attached SF1449 to complete quote information in addition to a separate quote (in PDF format); ensuring the quote contains information and pricing for all contract line items (CLINs) included on the SF1449. Offerors are required to submit with their quote enough information for the Government to evaluate the requirements detailed in this combined synopsis/solicitation. Offerors shall submit quotes via email, please note the maximum file size is 10MB. Emails over this file size will not be received. Submit only written offers; oral offers will not be accepted. This solicitation is issued as a Request for Quote (RFQ). (iii) This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are in effect through Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulations Overhaul 2025-11, R-DFARS Change 02/01/2026. (iv) THIS REQUIREMENT WILL BE: Set Aside 100% to a Small Business. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) number for this acquisition is 541330 �Engineering Services� with a size standard of $25,500,000.00. (v) Delivery: Estimated Period of Performance will be date of award � 30 DAYS ARO. (vi) The provision at RFO Part 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors�Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Oct 2025), applies to this acquisition. Provisions and clauses can be viewed via internet at Acquisition.gov, https://www.acquisition.gov/far-overhaul. Offerors shall prepare their quotations in accordance with RFO Part 52.212-1. In addition, the following information shall be included: PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION WITHIN YOUR QUOTE: SAM UEI: TIN Number: CAGE Code: Contractor Name: Payment Terms (NET 30) or Discount: Point of Contact Name and Phone Number: Email address: Warranty: Date Offer Expires: FOB Destination: Estimated Delivery Lead Time: Technical Approach (vii) The provision at RFO Part 52.212-2, Evaluation�Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Oct 2025) applies to this acquisition. ***Please read the evaluation criteria closely. If the vendor does not provide a full response, it will be found unresponsive*** The solicitation provides that quotations will be evaluated using the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) approach. The award will be made based on the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. The technical acceptability factor contains two non-cost subfactors (see below). The agency will first rank quotations according to price, from lowest to highest, and will evaluate the lowest-priced quotation as either technically acceptable or unacceptable, reserving the right to evaluate additional quotations for technical acceptability if deemed to be in the best interest of the government. Evaluation Factors: Price Technical Acceptability. a. Subfactors: - Technical Approach: Quotations will be evaluated to determine if the offeror's proposed technical approach clearly demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of, and the ability to meet, all requirements outlined in the Scope of Work (SOW). To be evaluated as technically acceptable, the offeror must provide a written Technical Approach that explicitly details how they will meet the requirement. The Government will evaluate this factor on an Acceptable/Unacceptable (Pass/Fail) basis. Quotations that do not include a technical approach or include a technical approach that fails to demonstrate a clear understanding or lack the capability to execute the SOW will be deemed technically unacceptable and will not be evaluated further. - Authorization from Trimax: Quotations must include proof of confirmation from Trimax Systems LLC that the work will be performed by a vendor that is authorized to work on Trimax's proprietary PLC/HMI source code. Failure to provide this with the proposal package will render the quote technically unacceptable and ineligible for award. The Government will award a purchase order resulting from the RFQ to a responsible offeror whose quote is responsive to the RFQ and considered to be the LTPA. (viii) Offerors shall include complete copies of applicable provisions, which are included in SF1449. Offers will be considered incomplete if these are not included with the quote. (ix) The clause at RFO Part 52.212-4, Terms and Conditions�Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Oct 2025), applies to this acquisition. (x) Additional Contract Requirement or Terms and Conditions: Please find a contemplated list of additional provisions/clauses in the attachments; the final list of clauses is dependent upon actual dollar value of the contract award and may change from those provided in the attachment. Full text for the clauses and provisions can be accessed via https://www.acquisition.gov/far-overhaul. (xi) Defense Priorities and Allocation System (DPAS): N/A (xii) Quote Submission Information: It is the government�s intent to award without negotiations. Therefore, each initial quote should contain the offeror�s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the government reserves the right to request clarifications if the Contracting Officer (CO) deems them necessary. Offers are due on 31 August 2026 at 12:00 PM, Pacific Standard Time (PST). Offers must be sent via email to: Mrs. Carmen Barahona at carmen.barahona@us.af.mil AND Ms. Karla Vazquez at karla_lizette.vazquez_montes@us.af.mil NO LATE SUBMISSIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED. (xiii) For additional information regarding this solicitation contact: Primary Point of Contact: Mrs. Carmen Barahona Contract Specialist carmen.barahona@us.af.mil Secondary Point of Contact: Ms. Karla Vazquez Contracting Officer karla_lizette.vazquez_montes@us.af.mil QUESTION PERIOD: The period for questions regarding this RFQ will end at 1:00 PM PDT on 27 August 2026. Please send all questions to the buyer via email at carmen.barahona@us.af.mil. Phone inquiries are not available currently. All questions and answers will be posted to this RFQ. *** This solicitation does not serve as a ?nancial obligation for the government. No award should be expected by the contractor, and no work may begin unless a fully executed contract document is received by the contractor***

Who won similar work

50 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Air Force and Space Force), same product/service code (PSC) R425.

Single-winner award sizes (50): middle half $2.2M to $47.2M, median $8.2M; range $10K to $4.0B.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION · $NOC · $39.3B6$2.2BSep 28, 2026
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP · $LMT · $67.6B3$230.0MJul 14, 2026
BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc.2$103.0MFeb 25, 2026
PCI AVIATION LLC2$14.3MApr 24, 2025
JACOBS TECHNOLOGY INC.1$4.0BJun 3, 2025
LEIDOS, INC. · $LDOS · $15.3B1$475.0MMay 29, 2026
CACI NSS, LLC · $CACI · $7.7B1$73.2MAug 12, 2025
RAYTHEON COMPANY · $RTX · $68.9B1$63.0MApr 8, 2025
IT-OSI-JV, LLC1$62.0MSep 11, 2025
Lockheed Martin Aero Marietta GA USA1$48.8MJul 2, 2025

Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.

Investor context
  • $NOC reported $39.3B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 50 past awards, $8.2M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K
  • $LMT reported $67.6B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 50 past awards, $8.2M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K
  • $LDOS reported $15.3B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 50 past awards, $8.2M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K
  • $CACI reported $7.7B revenue in FY2026. The median single-winner award in these 50 past awards, $8.2M, is 0.1% of that. 10-K
  • $RTX reported $68.9B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 50 past awards, $8.2M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K

One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.

Latest awards

Materiality: one award's value as a share of the winner's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings (or its last fiscal year, as noted when you point at it). Low under 1%, Medium 1 to 5%, High 5% or more. Many awards are paid over several years, so this overstates a single year's share.

Competitive landscape

For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 2 of these past winners lobbied Air Force, Dept of since 2024 (22 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Air Force, Dept of job
  • $1.5M from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Armed Services, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Armed Services
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 8 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.

  • 5 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 8 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.