SolicitationPosted Dec 2, 2024·Responses due Dec 13, 2024

N071--Move and install furniture at the VBA VR&E Office Fort Walton Beach, FL

Veterans Affairs · VETERANS BENEFITS ADMIN (36C10D)

Stage
Open solicitation
NAICS
238390
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
36C10D25Q0032
Set-aside
None stated
PSC
N071
Place
Not stated
Contact
Tiffany L Garfield (tiffany.garfield@va.gov)
Loading your pipeline and notes…
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation 36C10D25Q0032 in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
  • Nov 26, 2024
    Pre-solicitation
    Open
Solicitation
  • Dec 2, 2024 · this notice
    Solicitation
  • Dec 8, 2024
    Solicitation
    Open
Award
  • Dec 20, 2024
    Award Notice
    MEAK SOLUTIONS LLC. MENTOR 44060-5317 · $15K
    Open

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Decide bid or no bid before the response deadline.
  • Look at the past winners for likely competitors and teaming partners.
  • Follow the opportunity to hear about amendments and the award.

What the notice says

Evaluation Criteria Factor #1 Technical Approach - Schedule Each offeror shall submit a technical approach narrative which demonstrates how the offeror intends to accomplish the requirements as stated in the Statement of Work. Submit a preliminary schedule for performance satisfying the requirements of this project. A practicable schedule showing the pick-up at Montgomery, AL, Delivery to Fort Walton Beach, FL and Assembly/Installation in accordance with the period of performance in the Statement of Work. Rating Scheme - The technical approach standard will receive one of the ratings defined b… (show all)

elow. These ratings will be used to determine an overall rating for the project approach factor. A rating of unacceptable for either standard will equate to an unacceptable rating for the project approach factor and the proposal will not be further evaluated. Adjectival Rating Standards Rating Description Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the requirements of the solicitation. Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Evaluation Factor #2 - Past Performance (Similar projects). Evaluation of past performance- A maximum of three (3) past performance projects completed by the Prime Contractor shall be submitted to the Government. Each past performance shall contain the following: Brief project description. List of subcontractors. Initial/Final award amount. State any change orders if occurred during the project performance. Project Contracting Officer Representative or Client. The projects shall be recent (completion date to be within 5 years of the solicitation release date), relevant, and meet or exceed the proposed magnitude and scope of the proposed project. Offerors without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, unknown shall be considered neutral. If a rating of unacceptable for the past performance factor is assessed, the entire proposal will be determined unacceptable, and will not be further evaluated. Past Performance Ratings Rating Description Acceptable The Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror s performance record is unknown. Unacceptable Based on the offeror s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort Neutral Offerors without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. The evaluation will be conducted by receiving all proposals submitted and reviewing the lowest price proposal to verify that that proposal meets all solicitation requirements to include the evaluation criteria. If that proposal does not meet the solicitation requirements, then the evaluation team will move on to reviewing the next lowest proposal and proceed in the same manner until a proposal meets all requirements.

Who won similar work

3 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Veterans Affairs), same NAICS 238390.

Single-winner award sizes (3): middle half $230K to $368K, median $236K; range $225K to $500K.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
PANHANDLE CLEANING & RESTORATION, INC1$500KDec 15, 2025
LORTON GROUP, LLC. BRECKENRIDGE 804241$236KMay 15, 2025
BWHIT INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS LLC1$225KJun 1, 2026

Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.

Latest awards

Competitive landscape

For the 3 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 0 of these past winners lobbied Veterans Affairs, Dept of (VA) since 2024 (0 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Veterans Affairs, Dept of (VA) job
  • No corporate PAC money from them to the overseeing committees since 2024
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 25 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.

  • 0 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.