REQUEST FOR INFORMATION - Exploring Innovative Design and Construction Methodologies with Korean Industry

as real-world experiences and lessons learned in improving project delivery timelines and controlling costs. 1. Purpose Currently, USACE FED is looking for better ways to manage projects, improve project timelines, and control costs. To do this, we are exploring innovative and non-traditional methods such as: Progressive Design-Build (PDB): The project scope and price are developed in stages collaboratively between the Government and the Design-Build firm as a team. The team work closely together to define the project before setting a final price, and allows for the Design-Build firm to progress to construction, non-competitively. Other Transaction Authority (OTA) as a procurement method for the Government: A flexible U.S. Government contracting method that allows for faster and more innovative solutions, by reducing some standard contracting rules. Agreements resulting from OTA is legally binding instrument, other than a procurement contract, that is not subject to FAR and supplements. It enables commercial style business arrangements. Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR): A delivery method in which the constructor joins the design process early, collaborating with the designer to establish a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) and completes construction. *See supplemental information attached to this notice. We invite all interested companies in design, engineering, construction, architecture-engineering, and project management with relevant experience and expertise in Korea. This includes companies with strong experience in private sector or Korean Government projects. You do not need prior experience with the U.S. Government or with our acquisition procedures. We want to learn about your successful methods and how they work. 2. Information Requested To help USACE FED better understand Korean industry capabilities and prepare for a meaningful and productive Reverse Industry Day on 6 October 2026, the Government has identified the questions and discussion topics below for consideration by industry. These questions represent areas that USACE FED may discuss with industry during the Reverse Industry Day. Interested companies are encouraged to review the questions in advance, consider how their experience and capabilities relate to these topics, and come prepared to share their perspectives, experiences, lessons learned, and recommendations during the event. Companies are not required to provide written responses to every question. The intent is to provide industry with advance visibility into the Government's areas of interest and allow participants sufficient time to prepare for a meaningful Government-industry exchange. Company Details Company name, address, and website. Main point of contact (name, title, email, and phone number). Provide a brief description of your company's primary business areas, capabilities, and specialized expertise. How many years has your company been involved in design and/or construction? Has your company previously performed work for the U.S. Government? Prior U.S. Government experience is not required. Describe your company's capability and experience in delivering large or complex design and construction projects in Korea. Experience with Innovative Project Delivery Methods Does your company have experience with any of the following methods or similar Korean commercial or government practices? Design-Build (DB) Progressive Design-Build (PDB) Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) Other Transaction Authority (OTA) agreements or similar flexible contracting approaches Other innovative, collaborative, or accelerated project delivery methods used in Korea If applicable, please briefly describe your experience, including examples of projects where these approaches were successfully used. Industrialized Construction Methodologies USACE FED is interested in understanding Korean industry's capabilities and experience with industrialized, modular, prefabricated, and other innovative construction methodologies. Please describe your company's capabilities and experience with any of the following: Volumetric modular construction; Prefabricated building components or systems manufactured off-site and assembled on-site; Pre-Engineered Metal Buildings (PEMB); Tension Fabric Structures; Additive manufacturing (3D printing) for construction; and Other innovative or industrialized construction methodologies. Please describe your company's experience or capability to provide: Maintenance facilities using Pre-Engineered Metal Buildings; Aircraft hangars using Tension Fabric Structures; and Barracks, child development centers, kennels, or other repeatable facility types using volumetric modular construction, prefabricated components, 3D printing, or similar methods. What other construction capabilities or methodologies could provide greater flexibility or strategic agility by allowing facilities to be expanded, repurposed, relocated, or otherwise adapted as mission requirements change? Please identify the types of facilities for which these approaches may be suitable. To what extent are the materials, components, equipment, and specialized labor necessary for these construction methodologies available in Korea? If your company has completed projects using these methodologies, please describe the results, including, as applicable: Schedule or time savings; Cost benefits; Quality and performance; Customer satisfaction; Challenges encountered and lessons learned; and Any limitations or circumstances in which the methodology may not be appropriate. Korean Best Practices Based on your experience, what design, construction, acquisition, or project delivery practices have been particularly successful in Korea that USACE FED should consider for future projects? Please explain why these practices have been successful. Are there U.S. Government requirements, processes, or practices that you believe could create challenges or barriers to implementing these approaches? If so, please identify the potential challenges and suggest possible alternatives or approaches that USACE FED should consider. 3. Industry Questions, Concerns, and Suggested Discussion Topics In addition to considering the Government's questions above, USACE FED encourages companies to identify and submit their own questions, concerns, challenges, recommendations, or suggested topics for discussion prior to the Reverse Industry Day. USACE FED is particularly interested in industry's perspectives regarding innovative or non-traditional contracting and project delivery methods, including any challenges that may affect their successful implementation in Korea. Industry questions and feedback may address topics such as: Challenges or barriers associated with U.S. Government acquisition, design, or construction processes; Questions or concerns regarding innovative or non-traditional contracting and project delivery methods; Differences between Korean commercial or Government practices and U.S. Government practices that may affect implementation; Barriers Korean companies may encounter when participating in U.S. Government projects; Opportunities to improve communication, collaboration, and early industry involvement; Recommendations for improving project delivery timelines, cost control, quality, flexibility, or efficiency; Recommendations for adapting successful Korean industry practices for use on U.S. Go