LOGCAP VI Highest Technically Rated Offeror (HTRO) Matrix and PWS RFI
Army Contracting Command (ACC) · W6QK ACC-RI
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
This notice has no solicitation number, so earlier and later notices cannot be tied to it.
- Jul 24, 2026 · this noticeSpecial Notice
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
- Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
- Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.
What the notice says
1.0 Purpose and Strategic Context In support of the National Security Strategy and Army Transformation Initiatives, the Army is developing the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) VI. This program will consolidate legacy LOGCAP, Army Pre-Positioned Stock (APS), and Enhanced Army Global Logistics Enterprise (EAGLE) programs into a unified, global logistics enterprise. This Request for Information (RFI) is for specific feedback on the LOGCAP VI PWS and HTRO Matrix. The U.S. Government (USG) seeks constructive feedback from industry on two key components of the developing acquisition str… (show all)
ategy: The Draft LOGCAP VI Performance Work Statement (PWS) (v6.0, dated 9 February 2026), which has been previously posted to SAM.gov under Notice ID PANROC-P-0000-025256 on 23 February 2026, to include feedback on future-looking technological and operational requirements for the next generation of logistics support. The Draft LOGCAP VI Highest Technically Rated Offeror (HTRO) Matrix, which is referenced in the questions below. This RFI also provides an opportunity for vendors to submit brief white papers on relevant topics. 2.0 Instructions for Response Respondents are requested to provide the following information at the beginning of their submission: Company Name, CAGE Code, and Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Company Address and primary Point(s) of Contact (Name, Title, Email, Phone) Small Business Certification(s), if applicable. The response must be submitted in two parts: Part A: RFI Questions Respondents are requested to provide a response of no more than ten (10) pages to address the questions in the attachment titled "3.0 Feedback on Draft HTRO Matrix" and a separate response of no more than ten (10) pages to address the questions in the attachment titled "4.0 PWS Feedback and Future Capabilities." For clarity and ease of review, please structure your response to mirror the organization of the question documents. Use the same section headers and question numbers, followed by the corresponding answer. Part B: Optional White Paper In addition to the Part A: RFI questions, respondents are requested to provide a response to 5.0 within the attachment titled �5.0 CLIN Structure Feedback and White Paper Submission�. Vendors are also invited to submit a brief white paper on topics previously covered during LOGCAP VI market research efforts (5.1 within the attachment). This provides an opportunity for industry to offer further insights, innovative concepts, or detailed solutions. The combined response shall be no more than five (5) pages to address both 5.0 and 5.1 of the attachment. Disclaimer: This RFI does not constitute a solicitation. The Government does not intend to award a contract on the basis of the RFI or otherwise pay for the information requested and responses will be treated as information only and not as a proposal. Please submit responses via email to shaun.y.peterson.civ@army.mil, alyse.m.hardin.civ@army.mil, benjamin.p.graw.civ@army.mil, and angela.kim6.mil@army.mil.
Who won similar work
8 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same office (W6QK ACC-RI), same product/service code (PSC) R706 and NAICS 561210.
Single-winner award sizes (8): middle half $31.2M to $75.3M, median $48.6M; range $10.2M to $138.8M.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| TECHNICA LLC | 1 | $138.8M | Dec 27, 2024 |
| Akima Facilities Operations LLC | 1 | $97.1M | May 15, 2025 |
| RED RIVER SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, LLC | 1 | $68.1M | Mar 6, 2025 |
| VANQUISH WORLDWIDE L.L.C. | 1 | $51.8M | Apr 7, 2025 |
| JP LOGISTICS & CONSULTING, LLC | 1 | $45.5M | Apr 25, 2025 |
| BOWHEAD BASE OPERATIONS LLC | 1 | $36.0M | Jun 16, 2025 |
| LOGMET LLC | 1 | $16.6M | Feb 4, 2025 |
| SAWTST LLC | 1 | $10.2M | Dec 4, 2024 |
Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.
- Jun 16, 2025BOWHEAD BASE OPERATIONS LLC$36.0MEAGLE Fort Jackson, SC
- May 15, 2025Akima Facilities Operations LLC$97.1MEAGLE Fort Sill, OK Award W519TC25F0211
- Apr 25, 2025JP LOGISTICS & CONSULTING, LLC$45.5MEAGLE Fort Eisenhower, GA W519TC-23-R-0095
- Apr 7, 2025VANQUISH WORLDWIDE L.L.C.$51.8MEAGLE Fort McCoy, WI - W519TC-23-R-0119
- Mar 6, 2025RED RIVER SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, LLC$68.1MEAGLE Fort Knox, KY W519TC-23-R-0088
- Feb 4, 2025LOGMET LLC$16.6MEAGLE Presidio of Monterey, CA, W519TC-23-R-0104
- Dec 27, 2024TECHNICA LLC$138.8MFt. Liberty, NC
- Dec 4, 2024SAWTST LLC$10.2MEAGLE Detroit, MI W519TC-24-R-0006
Competitive landscape
For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 0 of these past winners lobbied Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers) or Army, Dept of (Other) or Natl Guard since 2024 (0 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers) or Army, Dept of (Other) or Natl Guard job
- No corporate PAC money from them to the overseeing committees since 2024
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
- 0 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.