Special NoticePosted Jun 13, 2024·Original deadline passed (Jul 9). See latest amendment for current deadline.

C1DZ--631-23-002 Upgrade Lab and Radiology A/E

Veterans Affairs · 241-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 01 (36C241)

Stage
Early notice (sources sought, presolicitation or special notice)
NAICS
541330
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
36C24124R0001
Set-aside
Small Business Set Aside - Total
PSC
C1DZ
Place
Leeds, USA
Contact
Chelsea Rodrigue (chelsea.rodrigue@va.gov)
Loading your pipeline and notes…
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation 36C24124R0001 in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
  • Oct 17, 2023
    Special Notice
    View
  • Mar 5, 2024
    Special Notice
    View
  • Mar 5, 2024
    Special Notice
    View
  • Mar 11, 2024
    Special Notice
    View
  • Apr 3, 2024
    Special Notice
    View
  • Jun 13, 2024
    Special Notice
    View
  • Jun 13, 2024 · this notice
    Special Notice
  • Jun 24, 2024
    Special Notice
    View
  • Jun 24, 2024
    Special Notice
    View
  • Jul 2, 2024
    Special Notice
    View
  • Feb 10, 2025
    Special Notice
    View
Solicitation
None posted
Award
  • Feb 10, 2025
    Award Notice
    WBRC INC. · $592K
    View

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
  • Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
  • Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.

What the notice says

The purpose of this amendment is to: Revise the evaluation criteria as incorporated herein. Extend the response due date to July 12, 2024, 13:00 EST. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged. The phase 1 source selection evaluation criteria now read: Each respondent s SF 330 submittal package will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 36.6 procedures. The selection criteria, in descending order of importance will be as follows: Specialized Experience/Technical Competence Professional Qualifications Past Performance Capacity Knowledge of the locality Experience in Construction Period Servi… (show all)

ces Commitment to the use of SDVOSB, VOSB, and other Small Businesses as Subcontractors Specialized Experience/Technical Competence Provide recent and relevant projects related to the Statement of Work with a similar magnitude (magnitude of construction for the design is between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000) that demonstrates experience with VA Design Requirements or equivalent with significant existing condition renovation. A minimum of 3 projects should be for comprehensive designs of complex medical use such as Clinical Laboratory, Sterile Processing Service, Operating Rooms, Surgical Centers and the like. Projects should detail the design manual requirements and approach, specialized HVAC and Mechanical Systems such as specialized clinical hood systems and hazardous clinical waste disposal. Projects should also detail working with end users and reviewing manufacturer equipment to coordinate added heat loads to the new HVAC system. Recency is defined as performance occurring within five (5) years of the date of this notice, except that ongoing projects must have begun no less than one (1) year prior to the issuance of this notice. Relevancy is defined as performance of work on projects that are similar in scope to the type of project anticipated under the resultant contract. This factor evaluates the amount of experience and technical competence the firm has in designing similar types of projects. Respondents must provide five (5) recent and relevant projects; any project provided in addition to the five are not required but will be considered if provided. The following information is required for all projects provided under this criteria: Contract/Task Order Number Project Title Location Prime Firm with % of self-performed work Subconsultants Start and Completion dates If project is not yet complete, identify the current phase/stage of the project. Fully completed projects will carry more weight than projects still in design Cost of Construction Description of the project in sufficient detail and clearly document how it is relevant to the scope of this project Professional Qualifications Professional qualifications necessary for satisfactory performance of required services. The A/E firm will be evaluated according to their ability to demonstrate the education, training, registration, overall and relevant experience, and longevity with the firm of key management and technical personnel as is normally expected of a company actively providing the required services and shall have demonstrated experience to perform a project such as this within a VA Medical Center or hospital environment. Firms shall provide brief resumes of proposed team members who will specifically serve as the project managers and designers of record, as well as of other relevant team members or subcontractor team members who will perform technical tasks under this contract. Subcontractor team member resumes shall indicate their record of working together with the prime contractor. The minimum required disciplines are Architecture, Mechanical (HVAC and Plumbing), Electrical, Fire Protection, Interior Design, Industrial Hygienist, Cost Estimator. The Designers of Record shall perform and direct the design within their respective discipline and shall sign and seal the drawings. All Designers of Record must be professionally registered in their discipline, and this must be shown on their resume. Each resume shall include a minimum of three (3) specific completed projects that best illustrate the individual team members experience in their technical field relevant to this project scope; any project provided in addition to the three (3) will not be evaluated as part of this criteria. Past Performance Firms will be evaluated for past performance on recent and relevant contracts with Government agencies (emphasis on VA work) and private industry in terms of cost control, professional performance, general management, cooperativeness, quality of work, compliance with performance schedule, and a record of significant claims against the firm due to improper or incomplete A/E services (references required). The evaluation may consider Past Performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to this acquisition. Past Performance information on contracts not listed by the offeror may also be evaluated. The Government may contact references and contact parties other than those identified by the offeror, and information received may be used in the evaluation of the offeror s Past Performance. While the Government may elect to consider data obtained from other sources, the burden of providing current, accurate, and complete Past Performance information rests with the offeror. The Government reserves the rights to obtain and evaluate Past Performance information from any source it deems appropriate. Respondents with no previous past performance shall state so when addressing the selection criteria. Documentation supplied should detail firms ability to work with government entities and design standards or similar relevant experience with other entities. The following information is required for evaluation of past performance: The A/E firm shall submit past performance evaluations (from CPARS if experience was on a Government contract) for projects provided under Evaluation Criteria 1, Specialized Experience/Technical Competence. In addition to the past performance evaluations the firm shall provide owner points of contact for each project listed to include name, title, telephone number, e-mail, contract number, project name, project description, and start and completion dates. Recency is defined as performance occurring within five (5) years of the date of this notice, except that ongoing projects must have begun no less than one (1) year prior to the issuance of this notice. Relevancy is defined as performance of work on projects that are similar in scope to the type of project anticipated under the resultant contract. If there is no CPARS data available, Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) will be accepted. Please utilize the attached PPQ document. PPQs shall be submitted to the CO not later than the closing date for receipt of the SF 330s. Email PPQs to Chelsea.Rodrique@va.gov. The subject line shall state 36C24124R0001 Past Performance for (Name of Company.) NOTE: A/E Firms must not review the Past Performance Questionnaire prior to submission. They must be submitted by the client/evaluator directly to the CO. Firms should follow up and encourage references to get the questionnaires to the CO in a timely manner. Do not include copies of the letters or questionnaires in the SF 330 package. Note:� We recommend you contact every reference listed and let them know we may contact them for information. Their timely replies would be appreciated. Capacity Capacity to accomplish work in the required time. The A/E Firm shall show current and projected workload within the firm overall and for the specific team members. Documentation supplied shall support that the firm has the capacity to accomplish the work in the required time. In addition, please highlight all work awarded by the VA in the previous twelve (12) months. Knowledge of the Locality Locati

Who won similar work

4 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same office (241-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 01 (36C241)), same product/service code (PSC) C1DZ and NAICS 541330.

Single-winner award sizes (4): middle half $272K to $387K, median $335K; range $228K to $396K.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
WILLIAM PEVEAR ARCHITECTS, INC2$515KMay 15, 2025
ACELA ARCHITECTS + ENGINEERS PC ALLENTOWN 181031$396KNov 8, 2024
APOGEE CONSULTING GROUP, P.A. CARY 27511-4580 NCL1$384KJan 3, 2025

Value counts new single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling (same contract, or the same office, day and amount); that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Contract modifications are not new awards and are not added in either. Notices whose amount is a placeholder such as $999,999,999 are not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings.

Latest awards

Competitive landscape

For the 3 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 0 of these past winners lobbied Veterans Affairs, Dept of (VA) since 2024 (0 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Veterans Affairs, Dept of (VA) job
  • No corporate PAC money from them to the overseeing committees since 2024
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 25 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.

  • 0 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name, including the subsidiaries a company lists in its SEC filings. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.