Fence & Defensive Barrier Installation for TSA at Milwaukee Mitchell International Airport (MKE)
TSA · WORKFORCE & ENTERPRISE OPERATIONS
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation 70T01026Q5900N003 in this department, oldest first.
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Decide bid or no bid before the response deadline.
- Look at the past winners for likely competitors and teaming partners.
- Follow the opportunity to hear about amendments and the award.
What the notice says
Amendment A00004 (9/2/2026): The purpose of this amendment is to provide responses to industry questions, incorporate additional terms and conditions, and extend the due date and time for submission of quotes. Industry Questions and Government Responses: Question #1: On-Site Presence for Administrative Meetings: The SOW designates the "Contractor" as the lead for Phase I Site Surveys and the Phase III Final Site Inspection (Deliverable 6). If our firm utilizes a highly qualified local subcontractor for physical installation, will the TSA permit our designated Prime Contract Project Manager to … (show all)
attend these meetings virtually, or is the physical, on-site presence of the Prime Contractor's administrative representative required? Government Response: The Prime Contractor remains responsible for all contract performance. Virtual attendance by the Prime�s Project Manager is permitted provide a qualified on-site representative is physically present for the site survey, installation coordination, and final inspection. The Government reserves the right to require in-person attendance if needed at a date and time that is mutually agreeable to the parties. Question #2: County Insurance Filing: SOW Section VIII states that the Contractor must have approved insurance on file with Milwaukee County. Will the airport authority accept the Prime's insurance file if it is supported by our local subcontractor�s active municipal policies naming Peractos LLC and Milwaukee County as additional insureds? Government Response: The Contractor must meet all insurance requirements in the SOW and any Milwaukee County or airport authority requirements. Subcontractor insurance may support the filing if it meets the required coverage and additional insured requirements, but it does not relieve the Prime Contractor of responsibility. Final acceptance of insurance documentation is subject to Milwaukee County/airport authority approval. Question #3: Defensive Berm & HESCO Technical Specifications: SOW Section III requires a 10-foot-high (13-foot on one side), 3-foot-thick horseshoe-shaped dirt berm utilizing "HESCO style or similar defensive barriers" filled with compacted imported dirt. To support accurate material takeoff and shipping pricing, could the Government provide the total linear footage or perimeter footprint dimensions of the required horseshoe configuration? Additionally, are there specific technical model numbers required for the HESCO barriers, or any structural compaction density tests required for the fill dirt? Government Response: Quoters should base their quote on the SOW requirements and any observations and/or measurements taken during the optional site visit. The Government cannot provide the total linear footage or perimeter dimensions for the horseshoe configuration. Please include the total linear footage and perimeter dimensions as part of the high-level design plan in your Factor 1 - Draft Project Plan response. No specific HESCO model number is required. Any �HESCO style or similar� product must meet the required height, thickness, configuration, and stability requirements. Compaction testing is not required. Question #4: Electrical Infrastructure Specifications: SOW Section III (Phase II - Electrical Requirements) specifies running electrical lines approximately 180 feet from the canine kennel to a new utility pole, and subsequently to the magazine. Could the Government provide the electrical parameters (voltage, phase, and amperage) of the power source at the canine kennel? Additionally, are the utility pole, exterior lighting fixture, and conduit to be entirely contractor-procured, or is any of this equipment being provided as Government-Furnished Property (GFP)? Government Response: The Government will not provide Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) / Government Furnished Property (GFP). Quotes must include all materials, equipment, labor, and installation necessary to complete the electrical work in accordance with the SOW. The Contractor must verify existing electrical conditions during the comprehensive site survey in Phase 1 - Design. Question #5: Limitations on Subcontracting (FAR 52.219-14): We note that the solicitation is a Total Small Business Set-Aside under NAICS 238990. However, FAR Clause 52.219-14 is not listed among the filled-in clauses under FAR 52.212-5. Could you please confirm if the Limitations on Subcontracting clause is applicable to this requirement? If so, does the standard 25% self-performance requirement for specialty trade contractors apply, or is subcontracting up to 100% of the on-site installation labor permissible? Government Response: FAR Clause 52.219-14 �Limitations on Subcontracting� (Oct 2022) does not apply as this requirement is being set aside for Total Small Business and the contract amount is not expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. Question #6: Wage Determination Standards (SCA vs. DBA Construction Rates): SOW Section III details on-site civil works, concrete post embedment, and structural barrier installation. However, Attachment 2 incorporates a Service Contract Act (SCA) Wage Determination (No. 2015-4899) rather than a Davis-Bacon Act (DBA) construction wage determination. Could the Government please confirm if all on-site physical construction labor is to be mapped strictly to the provided SCA classifications, or if a DBA Wage Determination will be issued for the construction/installation portion of the work? Government Response: The Government has reviewed the applicable labor standards requirements and will amend the solicitation to incorporate Attachment 5 - Davis-Bacon Act WD # WI20260001 for the installation portion of the requirement. The Davis-Bacon Act wage determination applies to laborers and mechanics performing physical installation work at the site, including fence installation, post embedment, gate and barbed wire installation, defensive barrier/berm installation, fill placement and compaction, electrical installation, site restoration, and related punch list work. Attachment 2 - Wage Determination No. 2015-4899 applies to covered service employees performing separable non-construction support services, including administrative coordination, project documentation, permit support, meeting minutes, and closeout documentation. Quoters are responsible for properly classifying employees and complying with all applicable wage determinations incorporated into the solicitation. Question #7: Contract Documents, Statement of Work, Section III, Phase II � Electrical Requirements. Please advise if electrical feed of +- 180�-0 can be run overhead? Government Response: Quoters may include an overhead electrical run as part of their high-level design plan. Any overhead electrical work is subject to Government review and approval, airport authority requirements, applicable electrical codes, and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) notification/determination requirements under 14 CFR Part 77, including submission of FAA Form 7460-1 if required. Question #8: Contract Documents, Statement of Work, Part B. Technical Requirements, Phase I Design. Please advise if required comprehensive site survey and preliminary design drawings need to be prepared by a registered Wisconsin engineer? Government Response: Not required. Question #9: Contract Documents, Statement of Work, Part B. Technical Requirements, Phase I Design. Please advise if required comprehensive Site Survey, Site Layout Drawings need to be prepared by a registered (stamped) Wisconsin engineer? Government Response: Not required. Question #10: Contract Documents, Statement of Work, Part B. Technical Requirements, Phase I Design. Please advise of any Tenant Construction Permit Application costs? Government Response: There are no fees associated with Tenant Improvement Plan (TIP) application submissions. Question #11: Part C states "The Contractor must confirm with the Milwaukee Mitchell International Airport (MKE) airport authority
Who won similar work
11 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (TSA), any industry: a loose match.
Loose match: same agency, any industry. Read the titles before treating these as competitors.
Single-winner award sizes (11): middle half $129K to $18.9M, median $1.1M; range $38K to $2.6B.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leidos, Inc · $LDOS · $15.3B | 2 | $3.3B | Sep 30, 2026 |
| Rohde & Schwarz USA, Inc. | 1 | $23.3M | Nov 17, 2025 |
| NORTH BELT OFFICE CENTER, LLC | 1 | $14.5M | Nov 25, 2025 |
| AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC · $A · $6.8B | 1 | $7.5M | Dec 1, 2025 |
| GLOBAL SUPPLY MANAGEMENT INC | 1 | $1.1M | Sep 17, 2025 |
| DS GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS CORP | 1 | $210K | Dec 1, 2025 |
| CHARPIE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. | 1 | $207K | Oct 7, 2026 |
| TS GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS. LLC | 1 | $51K | Sep 5, 2025 |
| MIKE'S ELECTRIC, INC. | 1 | $47K | Oct 1, 2026 |
| DSA DETECTION LLC | 1 | $38K | Oct 1, 2026 |
Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.
- $LDOS reported $15.3B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 11 past awards, $1.1M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K
- $A reported $6.8B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 11 past awards, $1.1M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K
One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.
- Oct 7, 2026CHARPIE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.$207KFence & Defensive Barrier Installation for TSA at Milwaukee Mitchell International Airport (MKE)No listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Oct 1, 2026DSA DETECTION LLC$38KScreening Bins for AT X-Ray Machines at MIANo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Oct 1, 2026MIKE'S ELECTRIC, INC.$47KVermont Regional Airport (RUT) CCTV System UpgradeNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Sep 30, 2026Leidos, Inc$672.5MScreening Equipment Deployment Services (SEDS) - Checkpoint (CP)Materiality: 4.4% of $LDOS revenue (Medium) SEC
- Dec 1, 2025DS GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS CORP$210KModel Based Systems Engineering (MBSE)No listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Dec 1, 2025AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC$7.5MBulk Resolution Technology (BRT) systems and maintenanceMateriality: 0.11% of $A revenue (Low) SEC
- Nov 25, 2025NORTH BELT OFFICE CENTER, LLC$14.5MTSA Leased Space Houston, TXNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Nov 17, 2025Rohde & Schwarz USA, Inc.$23.3MAdvanced Imaging Technology (AIT) UnitsNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Sep 17, 2025GLOBAL SUPPLY MANAGEMENT INC$1.1MTSA Uniform ItemsNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Sep 5, 2025TS GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS. LLC$51KBrand name Life Fitness Integrity+ SL TreadmillsNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
Materiality: one award's value as a share of the winner's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings (or its last fiscal year, as noted when you point at it). Low under 1%, Medium 1 to 5%, High 5% or more. Many awards are paid over several years, so this overstates a single year's share.
Competitive landscape
For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 1 of these past winners lobbied Transportation Security Administration (TSA) since 2024 (5 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Transportation Security Administration (TSA) job
- $247K from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Homeland Security, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 2 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
- 2 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 3 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.