E-6B Enhanced Phased Maintenance-Heavy (EPMH) Overhaul and Repair
NAVAIR and air warfare centers · NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation N00019-25-RFPREQ-APM271-0012 in this department, oldest first.
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
- Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
- Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.
What the notice says
E-6B EPMH Overhaul and Repair INTRODUCTION Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) Airborne Strategic Command, Control and Communications (PMA-271), Patuxent River, Maryland is conducting market research to identify potential business sources with the resources, capabilities, and experience to successfully perform multiple E-6B programmed depot maintenance inspections known as Enhanced Phase Maintenance � Heavy (EPMH) depot overhaul and rework events. NAVAIR intends to use the information provided in response to this Sources Sought Notice to aid in refining its acquisition/contracting strategy, bud… (show all)
get assumptions, and the Performance Work Statement (PWS) for this effort. The work entails performing scheduled depot tasks, within-scope repairs, in-service repairs, light planeside manufacturing and fabrication, and modification to airframe structures and aircraft systems per NAVAIR issued E-6B Technical Directives and E-6B depot technical manuals. The Contractor shall also have the ability to perform various Non-Destructive Inspection (NDI) techniques including Ultrasonic Inspection, Eddy Current Inspection, Bolt Hole Eddy Current Inspection, Magnetic Particle Inspection, Penetrant Inspection,?Rotating Eddy Current Hole Inspection,?Radiographic Inspection,?and Visual Inspections?as described in NAVAIR 01-1A-16 and A1-E6B-IETM PMC-E6B-D1E00-MAB00-00 using equivalent or better/newer equipment. To the largest degree possible, the Bill of Material parts to support the effort herein will be supplied by the E-6B Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) provider from stock that is owned by the E-6B program. The contractor shall have the capability to procure common bit-piece parts as required. The Contractor shall follow existing NAVAIR E-6B depot technical manuals, supplemental engineering information provided by the E-6B Fleet Support Team and have the ability to access/interpret Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) drawings and technical data. This effort is anticipated to begin as early as Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 with a base year plus four (4) options at the rate of approximately one EPMH event inducted per FY. The Government will not provide funding for a new business to enter the market for costs incurred to support any of the requirements identified above. BACKGROUND The E-6B aircraft is a Boeing 707-320 commercial-derivative communications aircraft that is operated by the United States Navy (USN). It carries no Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) or FAA-like certifications. The aircraft are equipped with CFM56-2A-2 engines that require removal, preservation, reinstallation and rigging during EPMH events. Aircraft are inducted for EPMH every eight years with a total depot processing time of 320 calendar days. EPMH is required by the Enhanced Phase Maintenance (EPM) Depot Specification Navy Model E-6B dated 29 January 2021. A revised version is currently being readied for implementation. REQUIRED CAPABILITES Interested parties may submit Capability Statements identifying their interest and ability to respond to the requirement. Only Capability Statements received on or before the response date indicated on this notice will be considered by the Government. A determination by the Government not to compete this proposed contract action based upon responses to this notice is solely within the discretion of the Government. Capability Statements received will normally be considered solely for the purpose of determining whether to conduct a competitive procurement. Capability Statements submitted should be pertinent and specific in the technical/management/business area under consideration, on each of the following qualifications: Describe your company�s ability to perform EPMH activities such as inspection, repair, strip and repaint, and modification of Naval aircraft. Describe your company�s procedures and policies for addressing and preventing quality escapes. Describe your company�s ability to provide hangar space/facilities and personnel that meets government Facility Security Clearance (FCL) requirements for General Services (GENSER) SECRET. ELIGIBILITY The appropriate Product Service Code (PSC) is J015. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 336411 (Aircraft Manufacturing) . All vendors must be registered in Systems for award Management (SAM Database) with its DUNs number and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code in order to conduct business with the Department of Defense. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 145 certified repair station SUBMISSION CONTENT The requested information below is to assist the Government in conducting market research to determine potential business sources that have the assets, skills, experience, financial stability, qualifications, and knowledge required to support the requirements above. Corporate Information Company�s name and address Company�s point of contact including email address and phone number who is able to discuss the response submitted. Company�s business size and list of NAICS codes under which goods and services are provided to include the following if applicable: Qualification as a Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB), HUBZone Small Business (HUBZone), Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB), or Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Concern Specific Sources Sought Information Requested The response should include a concept summary written from a system solution perspective showing how the concept and development methodology could satisfy the requirements defined herein and should at a minimum include the following: a. Describe your company�s approach for scheduled and unscheduled aircraft depot level maintenance and repair. b. Provide evidence that your company is a Title 14, CFR Part 145 certified repair station. c. Describe your company�s commercial quality control and assurance processes. d. Describe your company�s approach to managing Critical Safety Item and Critical Application Item requirements. e. Describe your company's Over and Above (O&A) approach/process during various Repair, Restoration, and Overhaul scenarios. f. Describe your company�s processes for preventing counterfeit parts from being installed into Navy aircraft. g. Does your company maintain insurance that covers military aircraft and equipment? h. Describe your standard warranty(ies) (e.g., what is warranted and for how long). i. Confirm your company�s ability to provide examples of an FAA approved repair substantiation data package and used part and component maintenance history and service records. j. Describe your company�s maximum aircraft throughput per year and ability to meet potential surge requirements beyond the maximum throughput. k. Demonstrate that your company currently possesses or has authorized access to the necessary technical data, or has a viable plan to obtain, generate, or otherwise secure authorized access to the necessary technical data, and that it will be maintained thought the duration of the effort being solicited. l. If an interested party would team with other parties, the capability statement would need to discuss how the work efforts would be separated, the corporate relationship between the parties (i.e. team arrangement, prime-subcontractor, joint venture, etc.) m. A description of the company�s past experience and performance on similar contracts. Include whether Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) ratings are available. This description should address current and prior experiences within five years from the date of this notice. If no similar experiences exist, please address future capabilities. Any future capabilities should provide an outline to the ability to deliver to the requirements defined herein. Specific Commercial Information Requested The response must answer the following questions: Are any of these items/services Commercial Items per FAR 2.101(b)
Who won similar work
26 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same office (NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND), same product/service code (PSC) J015.
Single-winner award sizes (26): middle half $781K to $9.6M, median $3.4M; range $10K to $717.1M.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. · $AIR · $2.3B | 11 | $957.0M | Apr 24, 2026 |
| L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. | 8 | $736.8M | Jul 2, 2025 |
| PERFORMANCE AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC. | 2 | $91.7M | Jun 4, 2026 |
| NATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES ASSOCIATES, INC. | 1 | $236.0M | Jun 11, 2026 |
| THE BOEING COMPANY · $BA · $77.8B | 1 | $75.9M | Nov 13, 2025 |
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION · $NOC · $39.3B | 1 | $10.3M | Jun 9, 2025 |
| GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. | 1 | $3.0M | Jul 27, 2026 |
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION · $LMT · $67.6B | 1 | $2.1M | Aug 31, 2026 |
Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.
- $AIR reported $2.3B revenue in FY2026. The median single-winner award in these 26 past awards, $3.4M, is 0.1% of that. 10-K
- $BA reported $77.8B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 26 past awards, $3.4M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K
- $NOC reported $39.3B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 26 past awards, $3.4M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K
- $LMT reported $67.6B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 26 past awards, $3.4M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K
One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.
- Aug 31, 2026LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$2.1MGreece Air Frame Field Service Representative (FSR)Materiality: <0.01% of $LMT revenue (Low) SEC
- Jul 27, 2026GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.$3.0MMQ-9A Unmanned Air System (UAS) Engineering Logistics Support (ELS) Optix SustainmentNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Jun 11, 2026NATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES ASSOCIATES, INC.$236.0MAircraft Maintenance and Modification Services in Support of the Presidential HelicopterNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Jun 4, 2026PERFORMANCE AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC.$88.8ME-6B Sealant Removal and ReplacementNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Apr 24, 2026AAR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.$305.7MC-40 Contractor Logistics Support: AwardMateriality: 8.8% of $AIR revenue (High) SEC
- Nov 13, 2025THE BOEING COMPANY$75.9MP-8A Platform Sustainment Support, Support Equipment Maintenance, Engineering Investigations and Integrated Maintenance AugumentationMateriality: 0.10% of $BA revenue (Low) SEC
- Jul 24, 2025PERFORMANCE AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC.$2.9MSealant Removal and Reapplication on One (1) E-6B AircraftNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Jul 2, 2025L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.$4.0MP-8A Airframe Depot Maintenance and Repair IDIQ MAC N0001924D0120 Order N0001924F5018 Modification P00010No listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Jun 25, 2025AAR GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC$4.6MP-8A Airframe Depot Maintenance and Repair IDIQ MAC N0001924D0109 Order N0001924F5017 Modification P00010Materiality: 0.13% of $AIR revenue (Low) SEC
- Jun 18, 2025L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.$4.0MP-8A Airframe Depot Maintenance and Repair IDIQ MAC N0001924D0120 Order N0001924F5018 Modification P00009No listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
Materiality: one award's value as a share of the winner's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings (or its last fiscal year, as noted when you point at it). Low under 1%, Medium 1 to 5%, High 5% or more. Many awards are paid over several years, so this overstates a single year's share.
Competitive landscape
For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 3 of these past winners lobbied Navy, Dept of or U.S. Marines since 2024 (39 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Navy, Dept of or U.S. Marines job
- $1.2M from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Armed Services, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Armed Services
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 8 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
- 4 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 2 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.