SPRRA226R0701 BRADLEY-LIMITED SOURCE-NSN: 6130016818278/ PN: 12571107
DLA Aviation · DLA AVIATION AT HUNTSVILLE, AL
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation SPRRA226R0701 in this department, oldest first.
- Aug 11, 2026Combined Synopsis/SolicitationOpen
- Sep 10, 2026 · this noticeSolicitation
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Decide bid or no bid before the response deadline.
- Look at the past winners for likely competitors and teaming partners.
- Follow the opportunity to hear about amendments and the award.
What the notice says
DLA Huntsville-Weapons Support 10 September 2026 DLA-WS-AHCA SUBJECT: SPRRA226R0701 Letter Request for Proposal (LRFP) DRS Network and Imaging Systems, Inc. 100 N Babcock St Melbourne, FL, 32935 ATTN: Ms. Jenny Guthrie The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) is issuing solicitation SPRRA226R0701 to procure the following in support of Improved Bradley Acquisition Subsystem (IBAS). 0001 Circuit Card, Assembly, NSN: 6130-01-681-827, Part Number: 12571107 This requirement is sole sourced to DRS Network and Imaging Systems, Inc. CAGE 32865 in accordance with FAR 6.302-1(a)(2); ��only one responsible sou… (show all)
rce and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements.� SPRRA226R0701�s purpose is to add IBAS parts to the DRS/DLA Enterprise Umbrella contract SPRRA220D0011�s subsumable contract SPRRA220D0012 for 1 ordering period; ideally, Fiscal Year (FY) 2028 (FY28). The Government contemplates Firm-Fixed-Pricing (FFP) for this effort in accordance with the overarching basic contract, and requests pricing for one year. This is an RFP for part support requirements generated by the USARMY TACOM and AMCOM Logistics Center (ALC) Project Offices used on the Improved Bradley Acquisition Subsystem (IBAS). The offeror is required to price 1 ordering periods (FY27). Currently solicited item and possibly more items in the future will be repriced again at the end of FY28. Instructions for the proposal: The proposal shall be in full compliance with the instructions of this RFP and this RFP is not an authorization to start work. The basic terms and conditions of the Contract SPRRA220D0012 shall govern the Contractors� and Governments� rights and obligations. Contract Clauses are governed by the Contract unless otherwise indicated, (excluding classified clauses; notices, clauses, and provisions) shall apply to all add-ons, delivery orders and shall govern the contractor�s and Governments� rights and obligations. No alternative or additional clauses shall be submitted with this proposal. DRS can submit previously coordinated alternates of term and conditions as assumptions to their proposal to assure maximum timeliness of proposal. Proposal(s) shall remain valid for a minimum of ninety (90) days from receipt by the Government. Nothing in this RFP shall be construed to preclude the contracting officer from requiring the offeror to supply sufficient information to determine the reasonableness of price, regardless of whether the offeror was required to provide such information in connection with any earlier procurement. If the contracting officer determines that the pricing information submitted is not sufficient to determine the reasonableness of price, the contracting officer may request other relevant information prior to accepting the proposal as adequate and consistent with the solicitation. The proposal should include proposed order sizes, evidence-based delivery schedules, and price ranges. The Government expects the Offeror to propose only the quantities and price ranges that can be supported and is open to negotiating any items related to quantity or price ranges. The quantities requested are based on a government estimate and the offeror proposal shall support the unit prices for each part number provided. DRS shall only propose sole source items for this requirement. DRS shall notify the Government immediately if the items or services being solicited are not sole source to DRS. Cost and Pricing. At a minimum proposal shall be addressed with the following. It anticipated that DRS� proposal in response to SPRRA226R0701 will not meet or exceed the threshold for certified cost or pricing data. Should the proposal not require certification of cost and pricing data, the Offeror�s attention is directed at the Federal Acquisition Regulation FAR 15.403-3, relative to the requirements for obtaining Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing (OTCP) data. Upon request the Offeror is required to submit Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data with the submission of the proposal. If additional supporting documentation is requested, the government is seeking a timely response (5-10 business days). Failure to provide Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing data will result in the offer being deemed inadequate and/or deficient. If using ProPricer System Submission Requirements: To satisfy the requirement for submitting OTCP data, the Offeror shall provide the original, unedited ProPricer system-generated "Detail Cost Breakdown" report. This submission is mandatory. The file must be provided in its native Excel workbook format (xlsx) with all original formulas, columns, and worksheets intact. Do not modify the file in any way after export. The submitted workbook must include, at a minimum, the following tabs: �P-Sheet �Direct Rates �Indirect Rates �CERs (if applicable) �CER Factors (if applicable) The proposal will identify key business unit personnel related to contracting, technical and pricing questions to expedite the question/review process. Additional Considerations DFARS Clause 252.211-7003, Item Unique Identification and Valuation may be applicable to items in this Letter RFP. Containers - The Government did not provide separate Subcontract Line Item Numbers (SLINs) to accommodate items that may require reusable shipping containers. However, if an item requires a reusable shipping container, a SLIN may be added to allow the offeror to price the item with a shipping container. The offeror shall propose the most expeditious delivery schedule for each item. First Article Test (FAT) may be required, and when applicable, the requirement will be documented at the CLIN level, and priced separately. When required, the FAT report shall be submitted in English. The offeror may submit a Request for FAT Waiver; however, FAT shall be included on the award in anticipation of the requirement on future orders. FAT is not restricted to a specific ordering period and may be implemented with any order during the duration of the contract at the discretion of the engineering source authority. Offeror may submit a request for waiver, although a waiver is not guaranteed. Production Lot Test (PLT) � PLT may be required, and when applicable, the requirement will be documented at the CLIN level. PLT is not restricted to a specific ordering period and may be implemented with any order during the duration of the contract at the discretion of the engineering source authority. Offeror may submit a request for waiver of the PLT, although a waiver is not guaranteed. Evaluation Criteria - Minimum technical requirements. To be technically acceptable and thus, eligible for award, a proposal must conform to all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements provided within all sections of this solicitation and/or within its attached addenda. Proposals receiving a technical rating of �Unacceptable� will be ineligible for award. Price. In addition to meeting the solicitation�s technical and quantity increment or range requirements above and cost and pricing requirements below, the Government will evaluate a proposal�s pricing for reasonableness. Evaluation of a proposal's pricing will not obligate the Government to order the estimated quantities or to distribute orders in the manner evaluated. The Government may reject a proposal as �Unacceptable�, if its pricing is determined to be materially unbalanced. Cost and Pricing Data. Offerors must provide all cost or pricing information required by FAR 15.4. Failure of a proposal to provide cost or pricing information required by FAR 15.4 will result in said proposal being deemed Unacceptable, and thus, ineligible for award. Arms Export Control may be required and when applicable the technical data package will be provided via the DOD safe site, https://safe.apps.mil/ which contains technical data whose export is restricted by the arms export control act (TITLE 22 U.S.C., SEC 2751 ET SEQ.) or Executi
Who won similar work
5 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Match: Same office, same NAICS 335999.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leonardo SPA Roma 00195 ITA | 1 | $3.8M | Apr 17, 2026 |
| Communications Professionals Inc. | 1 | $231K | Sep 25, 2025 |
| WOODARD ELECTRIC INC | 1 | $137K | Aug 26, 2025 |
| DMR Consulting Inc | 1 | $102K | Dec 17, 2025 |
| APPLIED COMPANIES Santa Clarita CA 91355 USA | 1 | $44K | Aug 1, 2025 |
Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in.
- Apr 17, 2026Leonardo SPA Roma 00195 ITA$3.8MSPRRA124R0080// SEARCHLIGHT// 6230016539052
- Dec 17, 2025DMR Consulting Inc$102KDistribution box
- Sep 25, 2025Communications Professionals Inc.$231K5975-01-664-2222 MOUNTING BASE,ELECT
- Aug 26, 2025WOODARD ELECTRIC INC$137KCable Assembly Multiple NSNs
- Aug 1, 2025APPLIED COMPANIES Santa Clarita CA 91355 USA$44KPanel, Power Distrib
Competitive landscape
For the 5 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 0 of these past winners lobbied Defense Logistics Agency since 2024 (0 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Defense Logistics Agency job
- No corporate PAC money from them to the overseeing committees since 2024
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards.
- 0 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.