Sources Sought/RFI - AFLCMC/ESAN FMS Brazil Radar Modernization
Air Force and Space Force · FA2330 ARSPC MGNT SYSTMS AFLCMC/HBA
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation A068794 in this department, oldest first.
- Sep 3, 2026Sources SoughtOpen
- Oct 13, 2026 · this noticeSources Sought
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
- Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
- Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.
What the notice says
This is a combined Sources Sought/Request for Information (RFI) notice. Any information submitted by respondents to this request is strictly voluntary. All information received from this Sources Sought/RFI notice will be used for planning and market research purposes only. The United States (U.S.) Government will treat your response to this Sources Sought/RFI notice as information. The information provided may be used by the Air Force to develop an acquisition strategy, statement of work (SOW), statement of objectives (SOO), and performance work statement (PWS) and associated specifications. R… (show all)
espondents are advised that the U.S. Government will not pay for any information or administrative costs incurred in response to this Sources Sought/RFI notice; all costs associated with responding to this Sources Sought/RFI notice will be solely at the interested parties� expense. All submissions become Government property and will not be returned. Respondents are advised that the Government is under no obligation to provide feedback with respect to any information submitted. To the maximum extent possible, please submit non-proprietary information. Any proprietary information submitted should be identified as such and will be handled accordingly and protected from disclosure. Proprietary information will be safeguarded in accordance with the applicable Government regulations. The Government shall not be liable for damages related to proprietary information that is not properly identified. Any submissions in response to this Sources Sought/RFI constitutes consent for that submission to be reviewed by Government personnel and Advisory & Assistance Services (A&AS) Contractor employees supporting AFLCMC/ES. The responses may be forwarded to other Government entities in consideration for applicability to other programs. All Government and Department of War (DoW) contractor personnel reviewing Sources Sought/RFI responses will have signed non-disclosure agreements and understand their responsibility for proper use and protection from unauthorized disclosure of proprietary information. All members of the Government and contractor team will be reminded of their obligation to protect such information to the maximum extent permitted or required by the Economic Espionage Act, 18 United States Code (U.S.C.) 1831 et seq., and other applicable statutes or regulations. In addition, Government members will be reminded of their obligation to afford protection under the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. 1905. 1.0 Introduction The Aerospace Management Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Branch (AFLCMC/ESAN) is seeking market information to identify highly mobile, production-ready, commercial solutions to support the modernization of Ground Control Approach (GCA) and Precision Approach Radar (PAR) systems capabilities in support of the Brazilian Air Force and potentially other FMS partner nations. 2.0 Objective The primary objective of this Sources Sought/RFI notice is to identify new systems to replace existing L3Harris GCA-2000 and PAR-2000 systems to improve the Brazilian Air Force�s ability to support radar surveillance and precision landing operations. Based on the review of responses to this Sources Sought/RFI notice, the Government may elect to release a formal Request for Proposal (RFP) at a future date. The Period of Performance (PoP) for any subsequent contract effort will remain variable and dependent upon the maturity and deployment timelines of the offered solutions. Under any future resultant contract, the prime contractor will be required to execute a comprehensive modernization effort, to include the delivery of all required radar equipment, provision of initial spares, and the execution of all necessary site modifications and system integration. 3.0 Desired Capabilities The below capabilities integrate specific parameters required by the Brazilian Air Force. 3.1 General System must demonstrate the capability to achieve full flight inspection certification (FAA/ICAO standards) for both Airport Surveillance Radar (ASR) and Precision Approach Radar (PAR) functions. 3.2 Transportation a. Threshold (T): Setup within 8 hours by 4 personnel. Transportable by KC-390 aircraft. b. Objective (O): Setup within 4 hours by 2 personnel. Roll-on/Roll-off capable on KC-390 with zero major disassembly. 3.3 Equipment Specifics 3.3.1 Surveillance a. Primary Surveillance Radar (PSR) Range & Altitude Threshold (T): Minimum range of 30 NM. Altitude coverage up to 10,000 ft AGL. Objective (O): Minimum range of 60 NM. Altitude coverage up to 18,000 ft AGL. b. PSR Probability of Detection (T): 80% or higher. (O): 90% or higher for a 2m2 target. c. Secondary Surveillance Radar (SSR) Range & Altitude (T): Minimum range of 60 NM and altitude coverage up to 18,000 ft AGL. (O): Range of 100 NM and altitude coverage up to 35,000 ft AGL. d. SSR Modes & Capability (T): Must support ATCRBS, Modes 3/A, C, S, and ADS-B. (O): Full support for all Threshold modes plus native cryptographic integration for secure military Mode 5 e. SSR Probability of Detection (Pd) (T): 90% or higher. (O): 95% or higher. 3.3.2 Precision Landing a. PAR Coverage & Switch Time (T): Service up to 6 runways, switchable within 60 seconds. (O): Service > 6 runways, switchable in under 30 seconds. b. PAR Instrumented Range (T): Reliable azimuth/elevation tracking and detection out to a minimum range of 10 NM. (O): Reliable azimuth/elevation tracking and detection out to 20 NM or greater. c. PAR Target Capacity (T): Track up to 50 aircraft in azimuth and 22 aircraft in elevation. (O): Track over 100 combined aircraft simultaneously. d. PAR Detection Probability (2m� target) (T): 90% probability at 10 NM. (O): 95% probability at 15 NM in rain and 20 NM in clear weather. e. PAR Resolution (T): Range: 400 ft, Azimuth: 1.2 degrees, Elevation: 0.6 degrees (all with greater than or equal to 80% probability). (O): Margins improved by 20% over threshold values. f. PAR Accuracy (T): Range: less than or equal to �100 ft (or 2%). Azimuth: less than or equal to �30 ft. Elevation: less than or equal �20 ft. (O): Margins improved by 20% over threshold values. 3.3.3 Communications Data Interoperability (T=O): Output standard ASTERIX Eurocontrol data format for all surveillance outputs. ATC Positions, Display, & Automation (T): Two (2) ATC positions. Explain and provide detailed documentation of the proposed a. ATC automation/display system. (O): Fully modular system expandable up to six (6) ATC positions. ATC Radio Communications (T): Each ATC position must have UHF/VHF transmit/receive capability and the ability to simultaneously monitor UHF/VHF Guard frequencies. (O): Fully integrated voice switch system with secure, encrypted transmit/receive capability. 3.3.4 System Reliability & Redundancy (T=O): Backup PSR transmitter or redundancy in the system is required. Backup power (UPS) is required. Mean Time Between Critical Failure (MTBCF) > 2,000 hours. 3.3.5 Maintainability (MTTR) (T): Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) < 30 minutes. (O): Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) < 15 minutes. 3.3.6 System Operational Certifications Identify whether or not the system has any/all of six (6) certifications for operations in both CONUS and OCONUS: Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System (ATCRBS) Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) Mark XII System (AIMS); Cybersecurity; Interoperability and Supportability (I&S); National Airspace System (NAS); Spectrum; and Transportability (air, ground and sea). 3.3.7 Ancillary & Support Equipment Requirements (T): Identify all generators, environmental control unit (ECU), hardware/software, and ancillary equipment requirements necessary to support standalone system operations. (O): Offer integrated, self-contained auxiliary systems that minimize external logistics footprint and setup time. 3.4 Maintenance Capabilities a. Operator and maintenance technical manuals/data provided. b. No more than four quantity maintenance personnel to set up and ma
Who won similar work
13 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Air Force and Space Force), same product/service code (PSC) 5840.
Single-winner award sizes (13): middle half $170K to $4.1M, median $1.8M; range $83K to $52.0M.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| IAP WORLD SERVICES, INC. | 2 | $92.0M | May 20, 2026 |
| SYMBRIUM INC | 2 | $4.7M | Jun 8, 2026 |
| APPLIED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, INC | 2 | $1.1M | Jul 15, 2025 |
| CPI Satcom & Antenna Technologies Inc. | 2 | $330K | Jul 6, 2026 |
| Amentum Technology, Inc. · $AMTM · $7.9B | 1 | $4.1M | Sep 16, 2026 |
| TRIMBLE INC · $TRMB · $3.8B | 1 | $4.1M | Sep 29, 2026 |
| TELECOMMUNICATION SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. | 1 | $1.8M | May 30, 2025 |
| APPLIED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING Benbrook TX 76126 USA | 1 | $1.5M | Jul 15, 2025 |
| DRS TRAINING AND CONTROL SYSTEMS Fort Walton Beach FL 32548 USA | 1 | $126K | Sep 10, 2025 |
Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.
- $AMTM reported $7.9B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 13 past awards, $1.8M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K
- $TRMB reported $3.8B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 13 past awards, $1.8M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K
One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.
- Sep 29, 2026TRIMBLE INC$4.1MLand Survey Equipment - TrimbleMateriality: 0.11% of $TRMB revenue (Low) SEC
- Sep 16, 2026Amentum Technology, Inc.$4.1MSurvivability Test Stand AwardMateriality: 0.05% of $AMTM revenue (Low) SEC
- Jul 6, 2026CPI Satcom & Antenna Technologies Inc.$160KElevation Motor Brake AssemblyNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Jun 8, 2026SYMBRIUM INC$2.4MElevation Gearbox Assembly ProcurementNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- May 20, 2026IAP WORLD SERVICES, INC.$40.0MAEWS AN/FPS-124 Radome Replacement ProgramNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- May 20, 2026IAP WORLD SERVICES, INC.$52.0MAEWS AN/FPS-117 Radome Replacement ProgramNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- May 5, 2026SYMBRIUM INC$2.3MAzimuth Gearbox Assembly ProcurementNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Apr 9, 2026CPI Satcom & Antenna Technologies Inc.$170KAzimuth (AZ) Motor/Brake Assembly XB Radar SystemNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Sep 10, 2025DRS TRAINING AND CONTROL SYSTEMS Fort Walton Beach FL 32548 USA$126KREPAIR SERVICES FOR THE UMTE PROGRAMNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Jul 15, 2025APPLIED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING Benbrook TX 76126 USA$1.5MREPAIR SERVICES JTE PROGRAMNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
Materiality: one award's value as a share of the winner's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings (or its last fiscal year, as noted when you point at it). Low under 1%, Medium 1 to 5%, High 5% or more. Many awards are paid over several years, so this overstates a single year's share.
Competitive landscape
For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 0 of these past winners lobbied Air Force, Dept of since 2024 (0 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Air Force, Dept of job
- $87K from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Armed Services, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Armed Services
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
- 2 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.